e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709 |
Resumo: | This article goes prospecting for some of the main experiences of using e-participatory budgeting (e-PB) that occurred between 2001 and 2013. We used the snowball technique to map out these occurrences. The aim of the study was to contribute to a better understanding of how such e-PB relates to other e-participation projects, in terms of participants, activities and the possibility of using mixed methods (online/on location) to mitigate any digital exclusion. The results indicated that there were 170 e-PB initiatives operating in 101 locations, of which 139 were mixed initiatives. Contrary to what is suggested in literature on the subject, most of these e-PBs do not address decision-making processes directly, but instead deal with the suggestions and requests of citizens (e-requests). The conclusion was then that the addition of ICTs to the e-PBs did not necessarily lead to an improvement in such processes. Nevertheless, one can argue that e-PBs can indeed offer new avenues and questions of relevance to the study of e-participation. |
id |
FGV-4_79423b1fe83ae225c90339ccbc629da7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/64709 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participatione-Presupuestos Participativos como iniciativas de e-solicitud: una prospección de los principales casos y reflexiones sobre la e-Participacióne-Orçamentos Participativos como iniciativas de e-solicitação: uma prospecção dos principais casos e reflexões sobre a e-Participaçãoe-participatory budgete-democracye-participatione-governance.presupuestos participativos electrónicosdemocracia digitale-participacióngobernanza electrónica.orçamentos participativos digitaisdemocracia digitale-participaçãogovernança eletrônica.This article goes prospecting for some of the main experiences of using e-participatory budgeting (e-PB) that occurred between 2001 and 2013. We used the snowball technique to map out these occurrences. The aim of the study was to contribute to a better understanding of how such e-PB relates to other e-participation projects, in terms of participants, activities and the possibility of using mixed methods (online/on location) to mitigate any digital exclusion. The results indicated that there were 170 e-PB initiatives operating in 101 locations, of which 139 were mixed initiatives. Contrary to what is suggested in literature on the subject, most of these e-PBs do not address decision-making processes directly, but instead deal with the suggestions and requests of citizens (e-requests). The conclusion was then that the addition of ICTs to the e-PBs did not necessarily lead to an improvement in such processes. Nevertheless, one can argue that e-PBs can indeed offer new avenues and questions of relevance to the study of e-participation.En este artículo se lleva a cabo una prospección de las principales experiencias de presupuestos participativos electrónicos (e-PPs) realizadas entre 2001 y 2013. Le metodología para encuentro de los casos es la técnica “bola de nieve”. El estudio trata de dar su opinión sobre cómo los e-PPs se relacionan con otros proyectos de e-participación, lo que se refiere a participantes, actividades y la posibilidad de usar métodos mixtos (online/presencial) para mitigar la brecha digital. Los resultados indican que hay 170 iniciativas de e-PPs en 101 lugares, con 139 iniciativas mixtas. Contrariamente a lo que dice la literatura, una parte significativa de los e-PPs no se refiere directamente a decisión política, pero a las sugerencias y peticiones (e- Solicitud). Se concluye que la adición de TICs para PPS no ha conducido necesariamente a una mejora de tales procesos. Sin embargo, se argumenta que e-PPs pueden ofrecer nuevas vías y cuestiones para estudios de e-participación.Este artigo realiza uma prospecção das principais experiências de orçamentos participativos eletrônicos (e-OPs) realizadas entre 2001 e 2013. Foi utilizada a técnica “bola de neve” para mapear as principais ocorrências. O estudo visa contribuir para a compreensão de como os e-OPs se relacionam a outros projetos de e-participação, no que tange a participantes, atividades e a possibilidade de uso de métodos mistos (online/presencial) para mitigar a exclusão digital. Os resultados indicam a existência de 170 iniciativas de e-OPs em 101 localidades, sendo 139 iniciativas mistas. Ao contrário do que é apontado pela literatura, significativa parte dos e-OPs não concerne à decisão política diretamente, mas sim ao envio de sugestões e solicitações pelos cidadãos (e-Solicitação). Conclui-se que a adição de TICs aos OPs não levou, necessariamente, a uma melhoria de tais processos. No entanto, defende-se que e-OPs podem oferecer novos caminhos e questões para os estudos de e-participação.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2016-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 50 No. 6 (2016); 937-958Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 50 Núm. 6 (2016); 937-958Revista de Administração Pública; v. 50 n. 6 (2016); 937-9581982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709/62582https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709/pdf_86Sampaio, Rafael Cardosoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-12-15T13:42:36Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/64709Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2016-12-15T13:42:36Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation e-Presupuestos Participativos como iniciativas de e-solicitud: una prospección de los principales casos y reflexiones sobre la e-Participación e-Orçamentos Participativos como iniciativas de e-solicitação: uma prospecção dos principais casos e reflexões sobre a e-Participação |
title |
e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation |
spellingShingle |
e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation Sampaio, Rafael Cardoso e-participatory budget e-democracy e-participation e-governance. presupuestos participativos electrónicos democracia digital e-participación gobernanza electrónica. orçamentos participativos digitais democracia digital e-participação governança eletrônica. |
title_short |
e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation |
title_full |
e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation |
title_fullStr |
e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation |
title_full_unstemmed |
e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation |
title_sort |
e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation |
author |
Sampaio, Rafael Cardoso |
author_facet |
Sampaio, Rafael Cardoso |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sampaio, Rafael Cardoso |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
e-participatory budget e-democracy e-participation e-governance. presupuestos participativos electrónicos democracia digital e-participación gobernanza electrónica. orçamentos participativos digitais democracia digital e-participação governança eletrônica. |
topic |
e-participatory budget e-democracy e-participation e-governance. presupuestos participativos electrónicos democracia digital e-participación gobernanza electrónica. orçamentos participativos digitais democracia digital e-participação governança eletrônica. |
description |
This article goes prospecting for some of the main experiences of using e-participatory budgeting (e-PB) that occurred between 2001 and 2013. We used the snowball technique to map out these occurrences. The aim of the study was to contribute to a better understanding of how such e-PB relates to other e-participation projects, in terms of participants, activities and the possibility of using mixed methods (online/on location) to mitigate any digital exclusion. The results indicated that there were 170 e-PB initiatives operating in 101 locations, of which 139 were mixed initiatives. Contrary to what is suggested in literature on the subject, most of these e-PBs do not address decision-making processes directly, but instead deal with the suggestions and requests of citizens (e-requests). The conclusion was then that the addition of ICTs to the e-PBs did not necessarily lead to an improvement in such processes. Nevertheless, one can argue that e-PBs can indeed offer new avenues and questions of relevance to the study of e-participation. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709/62582 https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709/pdf_86 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 50 No. 6 (2016); 937-958 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 50 Núm. 6 (2016); 937-958 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 50 n. 6 (2016); 937-958 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943772455731200 |