e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sampaio, Rafael Cardoso
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709
Resumo: This article goes prospecting for some of the main experiences of using e-participatory budgeting (e-PB) that occurred between 2001 and 2013. We used the snowball technique to map out these occurrences. The aim of the study was to contribute to a better understanding of how such e-PB relates to other e-participation projects, in terms of participants, activities and the possibility of using mixed methods (online/on location) to mitigate any digital exclusion. The results indicated that there were 170 e-PB initiatives operating in 101 locations, of which 139 were mixed initiatives. Contrary to what is suggested in literature on the subject, most of these e-PBs do not address decision-making processes directly, but instead deal with the suggestions and requests of citizens (e-requests). The conclusion was then that the addition of ICTs to the e-PBs did not necessarily lead to an improvement in such processes. Nevertheless, one can argue that e-PBs can indeed offer new avenues and questions of relevance to the study of e-participation.
id FGV-4_79423b1fe83ae225c90339ccbc629da7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/64709
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participatione-Presupuestos Participativos como iniciativas de e-solicitud: una prospección de los principales casos y reflexiones sobre la e-Participacióne-Orçamentos Participativos como iniciativas de e-solicitação: uma prospecção dos principais casos e reflexões sobre a e-Participaçãoe-participatory budgete-democracye-participatione-governance.presupuestos participativos electrónicosdemocracia digitale-participacióngobernanza electrónica.orçamentos participativos digitaisdemocracia digitale-participaçãogovernança eletrônica.This article goes prospecting for some of the main experiences of using e-participatory budgeting (e-PB) that occurred between 2001 and 2013. We used the snowball technique to map out these occurrences. The aim of the study was to contribute to a better understanding of how such e-PB relates to other e-participation projects, in terms of participants, activities and the possibility of using mixed methods (online/on location) to mitigate any digital exclusion. The results indicated that there were 170 e-PB initiatives operating in 101 locations, of which 139 were mixed initiatives. Contrary to what is suggested in literature on the subject, most of these e-PBs do not address decision-making processes directly, but instead deal with the suggestions and requests of citizens (e-requests). The conclusion was then that the addition of ICTs to the e-PBs did not necessarily lead to an improvement in such processes. Nevertheless, one can argue that e-PBs can indeed offer new avenues and questions of relevance to the study of e-participation.En este artículo se lleva a cabo una prospección de las principales experiencias de presupuestos participativos electrónicos (e-PPs) realizadas entre 2001 y 2013. Le metodología para encuentro de los casos es la técnica “bola de nieve”. El estudio trata de dar su opinión sobre cómo los e-PPs se relacionan con otros proyectos de e-participación, lo que se refiere a participantes, actividades y la posibilidad de usar métodos mixtos (online/presencial) para mitigar la brecha digital. Los resultados indican que hay 170 iniciativas de e-PPs en 101 lugares, con 139 iniciativas mixtas. Contrariamente a lo que dice la literatura, una parte significativa de los e-PPs no se refiere directamente a decisión política, pero a las sugerencias y peticiones (e- Solicitud). Se concluye que la adición de TICs para PPS no ha conducido necesariamente a una mejora de tales procesos. Sin embargo, se argumenta que e-PPs pueden ofrecer nuevas vías y cuestiones para estudios de e-participación.Este artigo realiza uma prospecção das principais experiências de orçamentos participativos eletrônicos (e-OPs) realizadas entre 2001 e 2013. Foi utilizada a técnica “bola de neve” para mapear as principais ocorrências. O estudo visa contribuir para a compreensão de como os e-OPs se relacionam a outros projetos de e-participação, no que tange a participantes, atividades e a possibilidade de uso de métodos mistos (online/presencial) para mitigar a exclusão digital. Os resultados indicam a existência de 170 iniciativas de e-OPs em 101 localidades, sendo 139 iniciativas mistas. Ao contrário do que é apontado pela literatura, significativa parte dos e-OPs não concerne à decisão política diretamente, mas sim ao envio de sugestões e solicitações pelos cidadãos (e-Solicitação). Conclui-se que a adição de TICs aos OPs não levou, necessariamente, a uma melhoria de tais processos. No entanto, defende-se que e-OPs podem oferecer novos caminhos e questões para os estudos de e-participação.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2016-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 50 No. 6 (2016); 937-958Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 50 Núm. 6 (2016); 937-958Revista de Administração Pública; v. 50 n. 6 (2016); 937-9581982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709/62582https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709/pdf_86Sampaio, Rafael Cardosoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-12-15T13:42:36Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/64709Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2016-12-15T13:42:36Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation
e-Presupuestos Participativos como iniciativas de e-solicitud: una prospección de los principales casos y reflexiones sobre la e-Participación
e-Orçamentos Participativos como iniciativas de e-solicitação: uma prospecção dos principais casos e reflexões sobre a e-Participação
title e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation
spellingShingle e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation
Sampaio, Rafael Cardoso
e-participatory budget
e-democracy
e-participation
e-governance.
presupuestos participativos electrónicos
democracia digital
e-participación
gobernanza electrónica.
orçamentos participativos digitais
democracia digital
e-participação
governança eletrônica.
title_short e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation
title_full e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation
title_fullStr e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation
title_full_unstemmed e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation
title_sort e-Participatory Budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-Participation
author Sampaio, Rafael Cardoso
author_facet Sampaio, Rafael Cardoso
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sampaio, Rafael Cardoso
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv e-participatory budget
e-democracy
e-participation
e-governance.
presupuestos participativos electrónicos
democracia digital
e-participación
gobernanza electrónica.
orçamentos participativos digitais
democracia digital
e-participação
governança eletrônica.
topic e-participatory budget
e-democracy
e-participation
e-governance.
presupuestos participativos electrónicos
democracia digital
e-participación
gobernanza electrónica.
orçamentos participativos digitais
democracia digital
e-participação
governança eletrônica.
description This article goes prospecting for some of the main experiences of using e-participatory budgeting (e-PB) that occurred between 2001 and 2013. We used the snowball technique to map out these occurrences. The aim of the study was to contribute to a better understanding of how such e-PB relates to other e-participation projects, in terms of participants, activities and the possibility of using mixed methods (online/on location) to mitigate any digital exclusion. The results indicated that there were 170 e-PB initiatives operating in 101 locations, of which 139 were mixed initiatives. Contrary to what is suggested in literature on the subject, most of these e-PBs do not address decision-making processes directly, but instead deal with the suggestions and requests of citizens (e-requests). The conclusion was then that the addition of ICTs to the e-PBs did not necessarily lead to an improvement in such processes. Nevertheless, one can argue that e-PBs can indeed offer new avenues and questions of relevance to the study of e-participation.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709/62582
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/64709/pdf_86
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 50 No. 6 (2016); 937-958
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 50 Núm. 6 (2016); 937-958
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 50 n. 6 (2016); 937-958
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943772455731200