From pressure to boldness: the conflict between decentralization and network management in SUS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Trevisan, Leonardo
Data de Publicação: 2007
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6585
Resumo: Taken into perspective, the implementation of the Unified Health System (SUS) has been facing managerial problems. First, because the increasing pressures for state reforms that will minimize costs affect the system¿s concept of universal care. Second, it is hard to balance the decentralization principle with the network concept, understood here not only as the link between different management spheres but also as how one can exercise his or her right in a network, from the planning stage on. On the other hand, operational decisions on healthcare were decentralized but the fund flow was not. Administratively speaking, the decentralization of healthcare management suffered an interruption when the Healthcare Operational Guideline n. 01/2001 came into effect. From the managerial standpoint, the introduction of the network concept, the strongest weapon against verticalization of the decision making process, faces operational and financial constraints (the implementation of electronic tokens) that keep the different organizations from ¿speaking the same language¿, which is the most effective way to create inter-organizational ¿bonds¿.
id FGV-4_a723e5e6a7d863693f51f38b7e766a29
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6585
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling From pressure to boldness: the conflict between decentralization and network management in SUSDas pressões às ousadias: o confronto entre a descentralização tutelada e a gestão em rede no SUSSUSstate reformpublic managementpublic policiesdecentralizationhealth sector reform.SUSreforma do Estadogestão públicapolíticas públicasdescentralizaçãoreforma do setor de saúde.Taken into perspective, the implementation of the Unified Health System (SUS) has been facing managerial problems. First, because the increasing pressures for state reforms that will minimize costs affect the system¿s concept of universal care. Second, it is hard to balance the decentralization principle with the network concept, understood here not only as the link between different management spheres but also as how one can exercise his or her right in a network, from the planning stage on. On the other hand, operational decisions on healthcare were decentralized but the fund flow was not. Administratively speaking, the decentralization of healthcare management suffered an interruption when the Healthcare Operational Guideline n. 01/2001 came into effect. From the managerial standpoint, the introduction of the network concept, the strongest weapon against verticalization of the decision making process, faces operational and financial constraints (the implementation of electronic tokens) that keep the different organizations from ¿speaking the same language¿, which is the most effective way to create inter-organizational ¿bonds¿.Vista no tempo, a implantação do SUS vem enfrentando descompassos gerenciais. Primeiro, as pressões, sempre maiores, por reforma do Estado que minimalize custos, afetam a proposta de atendimento universal do sistema. Depois, a difícil convivência entre o princípio da descentralização com o conceito de rede, aqui entendida não só como ligação entre esferas diferenciadas de gestão, mas como o modo pelo qual o acesso a um direi- to é exercido em rede, desde o planejamento. Por outro lado, decisões operacionais sobre a saúde foram descentralizadas, mas o processo de repasse das verbas para efetivar tais decisões não foi. No aspecto administrativo, a descentralização da gestão de saúde sofreu solução de conti- nuidade com a edição da Norma Operacional de Assistência à Saúde no 01/2001. No aspecto gerencial, a implantação do conceito de rede, a arma mais eficiente para enfrentar a verticalização de estruturas decisórias, enfrenta "gargalos" operacionais e financeiros (implantação do "cartão eletrônico") que impedem os atores das diferentes organizações de fala- rem a mesma ¿linguagem¿, o meio mais eficaz para gerar "vínculos" interorganizacionais.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2007-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6585Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 41 No. 2 (2007); 237 a 254Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 41 Núm. 2 (2007); 237 a 254Revista de Administração Pública; v. 41 n. 2 (2007); 237 a 2541982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6585/5169Trevisan, Leonardoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-17T20:54:49Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6585Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-17T20:54:49Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From pressure to boldness: the conflict between decentralization and network management in SUS
Das pressões às ousadias: o confronto entre a descentralização tutelada e a gestão em rede no SUS
title From pressure to boldness: the conflict between decentralization and network management in SUS
spellingShingle From pressure to boldness: the conflict between decentralization and network management in SUS
Trevisan, Leonardo
SUS
state reform
public management
public policies
decentralization
health sector reform.
SUS
reforma do Estado
gestão pública
políticas públicas
descentralização
reforma do setor de saúde.
title_short From pressure to boldness: the conflict between decentralization and network management in SUS
title_full From pressure to boldness: the conflict between decentralization and network management in SUS
title_fullStr From pressure to boldness: the conflict between decentralization and network management in SUS
title_full_unstemmed From pressure to boldness: the conflict between decentralization and network management in SUS
title_sort From pressure to boldness: the conflict between decentralization and network management in SUS
author Trevisan, Leonardo
author_facet Trevisan, Leonardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Trevisan, Leonardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv SUS
state reform
public management
public policies
decentralization
health sector reform.
SUS
reforma do Estado
gestão pública
políticas públicas
descentralização
reforma do setor de saúde.
topic SUS
state reform
public management
public policies
decentralization
health sector reform.
SUS
reforma do Estado
gestão pública
políticas públicas
descentralização
reforma do setor de saúde.
description Taken into perspective, the implementation of the Unified Health System (SUS) has been facing managerial problems. First, because the increasing pressures for state reforms that will minimize costs affect the system¿s concept of universal care. Second, it is hard to balance the decentralization principle with the network concept, understood here not only as the link between different management spheres but also as how one can exercise his or her right in a network, from the planning stage on. On the other hand, operational decisions on healthcare were decentralized but the fund flow was not. Administratively speaking, the decentralization of healthcare management suffered an interruption when the Healthcare Operational Guideline n. 01/2001 came into effect. From the managerial standpoint, the introduction of the network concept, the strongest weapon against verticalization of the decision making process, faces operational and financial constraints (the implementation of electronic tokens) that keep the different organizations from ¿speaking the same language¿, which is the most effective way to create inter-organizational ¿bonds¿.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6585
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6585
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6585/5169
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 41 No. 2 (2007); 237 a 254
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 41 Núm. 2 (2007); 237 a 254
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 41 n. 2 (2007); 237 a 254
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943763905642496