Insulated and undemocratic: the (im)possibility of social accountability in Brazilian courts of accounts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rocha, Diones Gomes da
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Zuccollotto, Robson, Teixeira, Marco Antonio Carvalho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/81248
Resumo: Th is article examines the transparency of the Brazilian Courts of Accounts to citizens, and whether these Courts have acted in a way that facilitates social accountability over public administration. Th e multidimensional scaling technique was used to determine the integrity of the 32 Courts of Accounts in Brazil. Evidence suggests that Brazilian Courts of Accounts are still not transparent to society and count on few mechanisms to help and facilitate citizen control. Evidence also shows that the means of social participation is limited, and represented by the Ombudsman, the Transparency Web Portal, and the Citizen Assistance Service. However, this study identified that the Fiscal Responsibility Law (LRF) and the Access to Information Law (LAI) had a strong influence on the Courts of Accounts. Although gradual, these elements can lead to future changes in terms of an increasingly prominent role of the Courts of Accounts as strong allies in the process of enhancing vertical accountability.
id FGV-4_c9d299c86b657cb385989f60fcc4044e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/81248
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Insulated and undemocratic: the (im)possibility of social accountability in Brazilian courts of accountsAislados y antidemocráticos: la (im)posibilidad de ejercer la social accountability en los tribunales de cuentas brasileñosInsulados e não democráticos: a (im)possibilidade do exercício da social accountability nos Tribunais de Contas brasileirossocial accountabilitycourts of accountstransparency.control socialtribunales de cuentastransparencia.social accountabilitytribunais de contastransparência.Th is article examines the transparency of the Brazilian Courts of Accounts to citizens, and whether these Courts have acted in a way that facilitates social accountability over public administration. Th e multidimensional scaling technique was used to determine the integrity of the 32 Courts of Accounts in Brazil. Evidence suggests that Brazilian Courts of Accounts are still not transparent to society and count on few mechanisms to help and facilitate citizen control. Evidence also shows that the means of social participation is limited, and represented by the Ombudsman, the Transparency Web Portal, and the Citizen Assistance Service. However, this study identified that the Fiscal Responsibility Law (LRF) and the Access to Information Law (LAI) had a strong influence on the Courts of Accounts. Although gradual, these elements can lead to future changes in terms of an increasingly prominent role of the Courts of Accounts as strong allies in the process of enhancing vertical accountability.Este articulo examina la permeabilidad de los tribunales de Cuentas (TC) brasileños a la sociedad, y si dichos tribunales han actuado de forma que facilite el ejercicio del control social sobre la administración pública. La técnica de escalonamiento multidimensional se utilizó para la construcción de mapas perceptuales en tres dimensiones, elaborados a partir de informaciones recolectadas de los 32 TC existentes en Brasil. Las evidencias sugieren que los TC son todavía poco permeables a la sociedad y poseen pocos mecanismos para auxiliar o facilitar el control ciudadano. Se constato, además, una limitación de medios para la participación social, que se reducen, básicamente, a la oidoría, al portal de transparencia y al servicio de atención al ciudadano. Se identificó, sin embargo, una fuerte influencia de la Ley de Responsabilidad Fiscal y de la Ley de Acceso a la información sobre los TC. Esto puede significar cambios futuros, aunque incrementales, en la dirección de la actuación de los TC como fuertes aliados para el perfeccionamiento de la accountability vertical.Este artigo tem por objetivo analisar a permeabilidade dos Tribunais de Contas (TCs) brasileiros a sociedade, por meio de 3 perspectivas: a) transparência dos portais; b) transparência da atividade de fiscalização; e c) participação cidadã. Para tanto, foi estruturado um roteiro de observações, a partir de recomendações de organismos internacionais, e foram coletadas informações dos 32 TCss existentes no Brasil. Em seguida, foram elaborados mapas perceptuais para cada uma das perspectivas analisadas, por meio da técnica de escalonamento multidimensional. As evidências sugerem que os TCs não são transparentes, o que limita a social accountability, e são muito resistentes a participação social, imitando-se a disponibilizar os mecanismos de ouvidoria, portal da transparência e serviço de atendimento ao cidadão. Essas práticas evidenciam que os TCs são, ainda, muito insulados, burocratizados e, apesar de terem um relevante papel no contexto republicano, pouco democráticos. Identificou-se, entretanto, forte influência da Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal (LRF) e da Lei de Acesso a Informação (LAI) sobre os TCs. Isso pode significar futuras mudanças, ainda que incrementais, na direção da atuação dos TCs como fortes aliados para o aprimoramento da accountability vertical.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2020-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/81248Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 54 No. 2 (2020); 201-219Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 54 Núm. 2 (2020); 201-219Revista de Administração Pública; v. 54 n. 2 (2020); 201-2191982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/81248/77583https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/81248/pdf_328Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Administração Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRocha, Diones Gomes daZuccollotto, RobsonTeixeira, Marco Antonio Carvalho2020-04-29T13:40:47Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/81248Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2020-04-29T13:40:47Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Insulated and undemocratic: the (im)possibility of social accountability in Brazilian courts of accounts
Aislados y antidemocráticos: la (im)posibilidad de ejercer la social accountability en los tribunales de cuentas brasileños
Insulados e não democráticos: a (im)possibilidade do exercício da social accountability nos Tribunais de Contas brasileiros
title Insulated and undemocratic: the (im)possibility of social accountability in Brazilian courts of accounts
spellingShingle Insulated and undemocratic: the (im)possibility of social accountability in Brazilian courts of accounts
Rocha, Diones Gomes da
social accountability
courts of accounts
transparency.
control social
tribunales de cuentas
transparencia.
social accountability
tribunais de contas
transparência.
title_short Insulated and undemocratic: the (im)possibility of social accountability in Brazilian courts of accounts
title_full Insulated and undemocratic: the (im)possibility of social accountability in Brazilian courts of accounts
title_fullStr Insulated and undemocratic: the (im)possibility of social accountability in Brazilian courts of accounts
title_full_unstemmed Insulated and undemocratic: the (im)possibility of social accountability in Brazilian courts of accounts
title_sort Insulated and undemocratic: the (im)possibility of social accountability in Brazilian courts of accounts
author Rocha, Diones Gomes da
author_facet Rocha, Diones Gomes da
Zuccollotto, Robson
Teixeira, Marco Antonio Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Zuccollotto, Robson
Teixeira, Marco Antonio Carvalho
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rocha, Diones Gomes da
Zuccollotto, Robson
Teixeira, Marco Antonio Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv social accountability
courts of accounts
transparency.
control social
tribunales de cuentas
transparencia.
social accountability
tribunais de contas
transparência.
topic social accountability
courts of accounts
transparency.
control social
tribunales de cuentas
transparencia.
social accountability
tribunais de contas
transparência.
description Th is article examines the transparency of the Brazilian Courts of Accounts to citizens, and whether these Courts have acted in a way that facilitates social accountability over public administration. Th e multidimensional scaling technique was used to determine the integrity of the 32 Courts of Accounts in Brazil. Evidence suggests that Brazilian Courts of Accounts are still not transparent to society and count on few mechanisms to help and facilitate citizen control. Evidence also shows that the means of social participation is limited, and represented by the Ombudsman, the Transparency Web Portal, and the Citizen Assistance Service. However, this study identified that the Fiscal Responsibility Law (LRF) and the Access to Information Law (LAI) had a strong influence on the Courts of Accounts. Although gradual, these elements can lead to future changes in terms of an increasingly prominent role of the Courts of Accounts as strong allies in the process of enhancing vertical accountability.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/81248
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/81248
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/81248/77583
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/81248/pdf_328
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Administração Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Administração Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 54 No. 2 (2020); 201-219
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 54 Núm. 2 (2020); 201-219
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 54 n. 2 (2020); 201-219
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943773643767809