The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrews, Christina W.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Vries, Michiel S. de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853
Resumo: In recent years, an increasing number of studies adopting the experimental method have appeared in Public Administration journals. It has been argued that the advantage of experiments in behavioral sciences is that researchers can control contextual factors while investigating the effect of manipulations on a variable of interest. Another point is that experiments can be replicated and, thus, increase confidence in research results. However, replications are rarely undertaken, especially in the behavioral sciences. This article examines the results of the “Open Science Reproducibility Project: Psychology,” which replicated 100 experiments previously published in leading Psychology journals. Based on the findings of this project, we present seven recommendations to Public Administration scholars that can improve the quality of their experiments.
id FGV-4_e12cbd84674a9ea8ffcb533d4b5c3623
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/84853
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in PsychologyEl método experimental en la Administración Pública: algunas lecciones de las repeticiones en PsicologíaO método experimental na Administração Pública: algumas lições das replicações na PsicologiaIn recent years, an increasing number of studies adopting the experimental method have appeared in Public Administration journals. It has been argued that the advantage of experiments in behavioral sciences is that researchers can control contextual factors while investigating the effect of manipulations on a variable of interest. Another point is that experiments can be replicated and, thus, increase confidence in research results. However, replications are rarely undertaken, especially in the behavioral sciences. This article examines the results of the “Open Science Reproducibility Project: Psychology,” which replicated 100 experiments previously published in leading Psychology journals. Based on the findings of this project, we present seven recommendations to Public Administration scholars that can improve the quality of their experiments.En los últimos años, han aparecido en revistas de Administración Pública un número creciente de estudios que adoptan el método experimental. Se ha argumentado que la ventaja de los experimentos en las ciencias del comportamiento es que permiten a los investigadores controlar los factores contextuales mientras investigan el efecto de las manipulaciones en una variable de interés. Otro argumento es que los experimentos se pueden reproducir y, por tanto, aumentar la confianza en los resultados de la investigación. Sin embargo, las repeticiones rara vez se realizan, especialmente en las ciencias del comportamiento. En este artículo examinamos los resultados del Open Science Reproducibility Project: Psychology, que repitió 100 experimentos publicados anteriormente en las principales revistas de Psicología. Con base en los hallazgos de este proyecto, presentamos siete recomendaciones a los académicos del área de Administración Pública que pueden mejorar la calidad de sus experimentos.Nos últimos anos, um número crescente de estudos adotando o método experimental tem surgido em periódicos de Administração Pública. Tem-se argumentado que a vantagem dos experimentos nas ciências comportamentais é que este permite aos pesquisadores controlar os fatores contextuais enquanto investigam o efeito das manipulações em uma variável de interesse. Outro argumento é que os experimentos podem ser replicados e, assim, aumentar a confiança nos resultados da pesquisa. No entanto, replicações raramente são realizadas, especialmente nas ciências comportamentais. Neste artigo, examinamos os resultados do Open Science Reproducibility Project: Psychology, que replicou 100 experimentos publicados anteriormente nas principais revistas de Psicologia. Com base nas conclusões deste projeto, apresentamos sete recomendações a acadêmicos da área de Administração Pública que podem melhorar a qualidade de seus experimentos.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2021-10-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/8485310.1590/0034-761220200746Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 55 No. 5 (2021); 1017-1033Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 55 Núm. 5 (2021); 1017-1033Revista de Administração Pública; v. 55 n. 5 (2021); 1017-10331982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853/80285https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853/80286Andrews, Christina W.Vries, Michiel S. deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-08T18:31:47Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/84853Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-08T18:31:47Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology
El método experimental en la Administración Pública: algunas lecciones de las repeticiones en Psicología
O método experimental na Administração Pública: algumas lições das replicações na Psicologia
title The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology
spellingShingle The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology
Andrews, Christina W.
title_short The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology
title_full The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology
title_fullStr The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology
title_full_unstemmed The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology
title_sort The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology
author Andrews, Christina W.
author_facet Andrews, Christina W.
Vries, Michiel S. de
author_role author
author2 Vries, Michiel S. de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrews, Christina W.
Vries, Michiel S. de
description In recent years, an increasing number of studies adopting the experimental method have appeared in Public Administration journals. It has been argued that the advantage of experiments in behavioral sciences is that researchers can control contextual factors while investigating the effect of manipulations on a variable of interest. Another point is that experiments can be replicated and, thus, increase confidence in research results. However, replications are rarely undertaken, especially in the behavioral sciences. This article examines the results of the “Open Science Reproducibility Project: Psychology,” which replicated 100 experiments previously published in leading Psychology journals. Based on the findings of this project, we present seven recommendations to Public Administration scholars that can improve the quality of their experiments.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853
10.1590/0034-761220200746
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0034-761220200746
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853/80285
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853/80286
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 55 No. 5 (2021); 1017-1033
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 55 Núm. 5 (2021); 1017-1033
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 55 n. 5 (2021); 1017-1033
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943774719606784