The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853 |
Resumo: | In recent years, an increasing number of studies adopting the experimental method have appeared in Public Administration journals. It has been argued that the advantage of experiments in behavioral sciences is that researchers can control contextual factors while investigating the effect of manipulations on a variable of interest. Another point is that experiments can be replicated and, thus, increase confidence in research results. However, replications are rarely undertaken, especially in the behavioral sciences. This article examines the results of the “Open Science Reproducibility Project: Psychology,” which replicated 100 experiments previously published in leading Psychology journals. Based on the findings of this project, we present seven recommendations to Public Administration scholars that can improve the quality of their experiments. |
id |
FGV-4_e12cbd84674a9ea8ffcb533d4b5c3623 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/84853 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in PsychologyEl método experimental en la Administración Pública: algunas lecciones de las repeticiones en PsicologíaO método experimental na Administração Pública: algumas lições das replicações na PsicologiaIn recent years, an increasing number of studies adopting the experimental method have appeared in Public Administration journals. It has been argued that the advantage of experiments in behavioral sciences is that researchers can control contextual factors while investigating the effect of manipulations on a variable of interest. Another point is that experiments can be replicated and, thus, increase confidence in research results. However, replications are rarely undertaken, especially in the behavioral sciences. This article examines the results of the “Open Science Reproducibility Project: Psychology,” which replicated 100 experiments previously published in leading Psychology journals. Based on the findings of this project, we present seven recommendations to Public Administration scholars that can improve the quality of their experiments.En los últimos años, han aparecido en revistas de Administración Pública un número creciente de estudios que adoptan el método experimental. Se ha argumentado que la ventaja de los experimentos en las ciencias del comportamiento es que permiten a los investigadores controlar los factores contextuales mientras investigan el efecto de las manipulaciones en una variable de interés. Otro argumento es que los experimentos se pueden reproducir y, por tanto, aumentar la confianza en los resultados de la investigación. Sin embargo, las repeticiones rara vez se realizan, especialmente en las ciencias del comportamiento. En este artículo examinamos los resultados del Open Science Reproducibility Project: Psychology, que repitió 100 experimentos publicados anteriormente en las principales revistas de Psicología. Con base en los hallazgos de este proyecto, presentamos siete recomendaciones a los académicos del área de Administración Pública que pueden mejorar la calidad de sus experimentos.Nos últimos anos, um número crescente de estudos adotando o método experimental tem surgido em periódicos de Administração Pública. Tem-se argumentado que a vantagem dos experimentos nas ciências comportamentais é que este permite aos pesquisadores controlar os fatores contextuais enquanto investigam o efeito das manipulações em uma variável de interesse. Outro argumento é que os experimentos podem ser replicados e, assim, aumentar a confiança nos resultados da pesquisa. No entanto, replicações raramente são realizadas, especialmente nas ciências comportamentais. Neste artigo, examinamos os resultados do Open Science Reproducibility Project: Psychology, que replicou 100 experimentos publicados anteriormente nas principais revistas de Psicologia. Com base nas conclusões deste projeto, apresentamos sete recomendações a acadêmicos da área de Administração Pública que podem melhorar a qualidade de seus experimentos.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2021-10-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/8485310.1590/0034-761220200746Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 55 No. 5 (2021); 1017-1033Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 55 Núm. 5 (2021); 1017-1033Revista de Administração Pública; v. 55 n. 5 (2021); 1017-10331982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853/80285https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853/80286Andrews, Christina W.Vries, Michiel S. deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-08T18:31:47Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/84853Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-08T18:31:47Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology El método experimental en la Administración Pública: algunas lecciones de las repeticiones en Psicología O método experimental na Administração Pública: algumas lições das replicações na Psicologia |
title |
The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology |
spellingShingle |
The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology Andrews, Christina W. |
title_short |
The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology |
title_full |
The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology |
title_fullStr |
The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology |
title_full_unstemmed |
The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology |
title_sort |
The experimental method in Public Administration: lessons from replication in Psychology |
author |
Andrews, Christina W. |
author_facet |
Andrews, Christina W. Vries, Michiel S. de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vries, Michiel S. de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrews, Christina W. Vries, Michiel S. de |
description |
In recent years, an increasing number of studies adopting the experimental method have appeared in Public Administration journals. It has been argued that the advantage of experiments in behavioral sciences is that researchers can control contextual factors while investigating the effect of manipulations on a variable of interest. Another point is that experiments can be replicated and, thus, increase confidence in research results. However, replications are rarely undertaken, especially in the behavioral sciences. This article examines the results of the “Open Science Reproducibility Project: Psychology,” which replicated 100 experiments previously published in leading Psychology journals. Based on the findings of this project, we present seven recommendations to Public Administration scholars that can improve the quality of their experiments. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853 10.1590/0034-761220200746 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-761220200746 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853/80285 https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/84853/80286 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 55 No. 5 (2021); 1017-1033 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 55 Núm. 5 (2021); 1017-1033 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 55 n. 5 (2021); 1017-1033 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943774719606784 |