Public sector management and social management: Brazilian scientific production between 2000 and 2005
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6649 |
Resumo: | Over the past few years, there has been a great effort from researchers to compile a critical assessment of scientific publications from several fields of knowledge. Ho- wever, public sector management and social management have not been covered as much as other fields. In order to fill the gap, this article presents a framework of the scientific production in public management and social management based on data gathered from 549 papers published in the Enanpad proceedings between 2000 and 2005. The variables analyzed in each paper were: the number of authors per paper; the institution and state of origin of the authors; the ratio of theoretical and empi- rical papers; the method and research strategy used. It was found that the average number of authors per paper is growing. Most of these papers were categorized as ¿theoretical-empirical¿. Within the theoretical-empirical papers, approximately 67% were of qualitative nature, predominantly case studies (55,7%) as the main research method, although it can be suggested there is a growth of quantitative methods. Among the authors¿ institutions or origin, five can be highlighted as the most productive, responsible for approximately 50% of the papers published within that time-frame, and around 56% of the papers can be narrowed down to three states in the country |
id |
FGV-4_e2648ebcaffe0894674eba940074b15c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6649 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Public sector management and social management: Brazilian scientific production between 2000 and 2005Administração pública e gestão social: a produção científica brasileira entre 2000 e 2005public sector managementsocial managementresearch methodologyacademic researchscientific production.administração públicagestão socialmetodologia de pesquisapesquisa acadêmicaprodução científica.Over the past few years, there has been a great effort from researchers to compile a critical assessment of scientific publications from several fields of knowledge. Ho- wever, public sector management and social management have not been covered as much as other fields. In order to fill the gap, this article presents a framework of the scientific production in public management and social management based on data gathered from 549 papers published in the Enanpad proceedings between 2000 and 2005. The variables analyzed in each paper were: the number of authors per paper; the institution and state of origin of the authors; the ratio of theoretical and empi- rical papers; the method and research strategy used. It was found that the average number of authors per paper is growing. Most of these papers were categorized as ¿theoretical-empirical¿. Within the theoretical-empirical papers, approximately 67% were of qualitative nature, predominantly case studies (55,7%) as the main research method, although it can be suggested there is a growth of quantitative methods. Among the authors¿ institutions or origin, five can be highlighted as the most productive, responsible for approximately 50% of the papers published within that time-frame, and around 56% of the papers can be narrowed down to three states in the countryNos últimos anos, observa-se grande esforço dos pesquisadores em fazer um balan- ço crítico das publicações científicas em diversas disciplinas. Porém, algumas áreas foram pouco contempladas, como a administração pública e gestão social. Buscando preencher essa lacuna, este artigo apresenta um quadro geral da produção científica em administração pública e gestão social com base nos dados levantados em 549 artigos publicados nos anais do Enanpad, entre os anos de 2000 e 2005. As variáveis analisadas em cada artigo foram: número de autores por artigo; instituição e estado de origem dos autores; proporção de trabalhos teóricos e empíricos; e método e es- tratégia de pesquisa. Verificou-se que a média de autores por artigo vem crescendo. A maioria enquadrou-se como teórico-empírico (76,1%). Dos artigos teórico-em- píricos, aproximadamente 67% utilizaram o método qualitativo, com predomínio do estudo de caso (55,7%) como estratégia de pesquisa; porém o uso do método quantitativo vem aumentando. Entre as instituições de origem dos autores, cinco se destacaram como as mais prolíficas, respondendo por aproximadamente 50% dos artigos publicados no período; e cerca de 56% dos artigos concentraram-se em três estados do paísFundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6649Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 42 No. 4 (2008); 655 a 680Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 42 Núm. 4 (2008); 655 a 680Revista de Administração Pública; v. 42 n. 4 (2008); 655 a 6801982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6649/5233Hocayen-da-Silva, Antônio JoãoRossoni, LucianoJúnior, Israel Ferreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-17T20:53:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6649Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-17T20:53:05Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Public sector management and social management: Brazilian scientific production between 2000 and 2005 Administração pública e gestão social: a produção científica brasileira entre 2000 e 2005 |
title |
Public sector management and social management: Brazilian scientific production between 2000 and 2005 |
spellingShingle |
Public sector management and social management: Brazilian scientific production between 2000 and 2005 Hocayen-da-Silva, Antônio João public sector management social management research methodology academic research scientific production. administração pública gestão social metodologia de pesquisa pesquisa acadêmica produção científica. |
title_short |
Public sector management and social management: Brazilian scientific production between 2000 and 2005 |
title_full |
Public sector management and social management: Brazilian scientific production between 2000 and 2005 |
title_fullStr |
Public sector management and social management: Brazilian scientific production between 2000 and 2005 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Public sector management and social management: Brazilian scientific production between 2000 and 2005 |
title_sort |
Public sector management and social management: Brazilian scientific production between 2000 and 2005 |
author |
Hocayen-da-Silva, Antônio João |
author_facet |
Hocayen-da-Silva, Antônio João Rossoni, Luciano Júnior, Israel Ferreira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rossoni, Luciano Júnior, Israel Ferreira |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hocayen-da-Silva, Antônio João Rossoni, Luciano Júnior, Israel Ferreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
public sector management social management research methodology academic research scientific production. administração pública gestão social metodologia de pesquisa pesquisa acadêmica produção científica. |
topic |
public sector management social management research methodology academic research scientific production. administração pública gestão social metodologia de pesquisa pesquisa acadêmica produção científica. |
description |
Over the past few years, there has been a great effort from researchers to compile a critical assessment of scientific publications from several fields of knowledge. Ho- wever, public sector management and social management have not been covered as much as other fields. In order to fill the gap, this article presents a framework of the scientific production in public management and social management based on data gathered from 549 papers published in the Enanpad proceedings between 2000 and 2005. The variables analyzed in each paper were: the number of authors per paper; the institution and state of origin of the authors; the ratio of theoretical and empi- rical papers; the method and research strategy used. It was found that the average number of authors per paper is growing. Most of these papers were categorized as ¿theoretical-empirical¿. Within the theoretical-empirical papers, approximately 67% were of qualitative nature, predominantly case studies (55,7%) as the main research method, although it can be suggested there is a growth of quantitative methods. Among the authors¿ institutions or origin, five can be highlighted as the most productive, responsible for approximately 50% of the papers published within that time-frame, and around 56% of the papers can be narrowed down to three states in the country |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6649 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6649 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6649/5233 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 42 No. 4 (2008); 655 a 680 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 42 Núm. 4 (2008); 655 a 680 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 42 n. 4 (2008); 655 a 680 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943764024131584 |