Resources, innovation and performance in labor courts in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/74975 |
Resumo: | This article examines the relationships between resources, innovation, and performance in courts. Data from 24 Brazilian labor courts covering the period between 2003 and 2013 were used to develop theoretical/empirical models using Data Envelopment Analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. The results indicate that there was improvement in the performance of the courts during the period examined. This improvement owed more to the adoption of innovations than to variation in technical efficiency. Critical periods for the adoption of the electronic judicial process (in 2006 and 2012) had a negative impact on the index related to innovation adoption. The stochastic model shows that court size and investment in the training of personnel are key factors for explaining the variation in the efficiency of the courts. |
id |
FGV-4_f887dd6c15538988ed2800c2d64aded8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/74975 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Resources, innovation and performance in labor courts in BrazilRecursos, innovación y desempeño en los tribunales laborales en BrasilRecursos, inovação e desempenho em tribunais do trabalho no Brasilinnovationperformancejudicial administration.innovacióndesempeñoadministración judicial.inovaçãodesempenhoadministração judicial.This article examines the relationships between resources, innovation, and performance in courts. Data from 24 Brazilian labor courts covering the period between 2003 and 2013 were used to develop theoretical/empirical models using Data Envelopment Analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. The results indicate that there was improvement in the performance of the courts during the period examined. This improvement owed more to the adoption of innovations than to variation in technical efficiency. Critical periods for the adoption of the electronic judicial process (in 2006 and 2012) had a negative impact on the index related to innovation adoption. The stochastic model shows that court size and investment in the training of personnel are key factors for explaining the variation in the efficiency of the courts.El presente estudio examina las relaciones entre los recursos, la innovación y el desempeño en los tribunales. Seutilizaron datos de 24 tribunales laborales brasileños que cubrían el período comprendido entre 2003 y 2013 paradesarrollar modelos teóricos/empíricos utilizando el análisis por envoltura de datos y análisis de frontera estocástica.Los resultados indican que hubo mejoras en el desempeño de los tribunales durante el período examinado.Esta mejora se debe más a la adopción de innovaciones que a la variación en la eficiencia técnica. Los períodoscríticos para la adopción del proceso judicial electrónico (en 2006 y 2012) tuvieron un impacto negativo en elíndice relacionado con la adopción de la innovación. El modelo estocástico muestra que el tamaño de la corte y lainversión en la formación del personal son factores clave para explicar la variación en la eficiencia de los tribunales.O presente estudo examina as relações entre recursos, inovação e desempenho em tribunais. Foram utilizados dados de 24 tribunais trabalhistas brasileiros no período entre 2003 e 2013. Foram desenvolvidos modelos teóricos/empíricos utilizando a análise envoltória de dados e a análise de fronteira estocástica. Os resultados indicam que houve melhora no desempenho dos tribunais durante o período estudado. Essa melhoria deve-se mais em função da adoção de inovações do que da variação da eficiência técnica. Os períodos críticos para a adoção do processo judicial eletrônico (em 2006 e 2012) tiveram um impacto negativo no índice relacionado com a adoção de inovação. O modelo estocástico indicou que o tamanho do tribunal e o investimento na formação de pessoal foram fatores-chave para explicar a variação na eficiência dos tribunais.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2018-05-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/74975Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 52 No. 3 (2018); 486-506Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 52 Núm. 3 (2018); 486-506Revista de Administração Pública; v. 52 n. 3 (2018); 486-5061982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/74975/71793https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/74975/pdf_198Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Administração Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSousa, Marcos de MoraesGuimaraes, Tomas Aquino2018-07-02T18:15:48Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/74975Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2018-07-02T18:15:48Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Resources, innovation and performance in labor courts in Brazil Recursos, innovación y desempeño en los tribunales laborales en Brasil Recursos, inovação e desempenho em tribunais do trabalho no Brasil |
title |
Resources, innovation and performance in labor courts in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Resources, innovation and performance in labor courts in Brazil Sousa, Marcos de Moraes innovation performance judicial administration. innovación desempeño administración judicial. inovação desempenho administração judicial. |
title_short |
Resources, innovation and performance in labor courts in Brazil |
title_full |
Resources, innovation and performance in labor courts in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Resources, innovation and performance in labor courts in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Resources, innovation and performance in labor courts in Brazil |
title_sort |
Resources, innovation and performance in labor courts in Brazil |
author |
Sousa, Marcos de Moraes |
author_facet |
Sousa, Marcos de Moraes Guimaraes, Tomas Aquino |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guimaraes, Tomas Aquino |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sousa, Marcos de Moraes Guimaraes, Tomas Aquino |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
innovation performance judicial administration. innovación desempeño administración judicial. inovação desempenho administração judicial. |
topic |
innovation performance judicial administration. innovación desempeño administración judicial. inovação desempenho administração judicial. |
description |
This article examines the relationships between resources, innovation, and performance in courts. Data from 24 Brazilian labor courts covering the period between 2003 and 2013 were used to develop theoretical/empirical models using Data Envelopment Analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. The results indicate that there was improvement in the performance of the courts during the period examined. This improvement owed more to the adoption of innovations than to variation in technical efficiency. Critical periods for the adoption of the electronic judicial process (in 2006 and 2012) had a negative impact on the index related to innovation adoption. The stochastic model shows that court size and investment in the training of personnel are key factors for explaining the variation in the efficiency of the courts. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-05-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/74975 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/74975 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/74975/71793 https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/74975/pdf_198 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Administração Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Administração Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 52 No. 3 (2018); 486-506 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 52 Núm. 3 (2018); 486-506 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 52 n. 3 (2018); 486-506 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943773002039296 |