Analyzing the infl uence of economics on management education and practice: a criticism through the concept of development

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, José Antonio Puppim de
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/view/44201
Resumo: This article is a criticism of the neoclassical economics infl uence on theories of management using the experience and lessons from the evolution of the debates in development studies. I argue that this infl uence has introduced values that are incompatible with the values of what could be a socially responsible society in a modern view of what is development. The article fi rstly examines the evolution of the debates of the concept of development, as they moved from being forums dominated exclusively by economists – who saw development as synonym of economic growth – to a multi and interdisciplinary debate over several dimensions of development, including social, environmental and democracy issues. Secondly, it criticizes management theories based on neoclassical economics through the experience of the development debate. I argue that management theories based on economics see the management solutions as a one-way alternative (market- based solutions), infl uence the thinking of both the means and the ends of organizations, and have propagated a series of values that are not compatible with a socially developed society.
id FGV-6_b701fcfdc2fa26c8801990fc3e9da941
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/44201
network_acronym_str FGV-6
network_name_str Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Analyzing the infl uence of economics on management education and practice: a criticism through the concept of developmentThis article is a criticism of the neoclassical economics infl uence on theories of management using the experience and lessons from the evolution of the debates in development studies. I argue that this infl uence has introduced values that are incompatible with the values of what could be a socially responsible society in a modern view of what is development. The article fi rstly examines the evolution of the debates of the concept of development, as they moved from being forums dominated exclusively by economists – who saw development as synonym of economic growth – to a multi and interdisciplinary debate over several dimensions of development, including social, environmental and democracy issues. Secondly, it criticizes management theories based on neoclassical economics through the experience of the development debate. I argue that management theories based on economics see the management solutions as a one-way alternative (market- based solutions), infl uence the thinking of both the means and the ends of organizations, and have propagated a series of values that are not compatible with a socially developed society.FGV EAESP Pesquisa e Publicações2009-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/view/4420110.12660/cgpc.v14n55.44201Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania; Vol. 14 No. 55 (2009): julho-dezembroCadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania; Vol. 14 Núm. 55 (2009): julho-dezembroCadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania; v. 14 n. 55 (2009): julho-dezembro2236-57101806-2261reponame:Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/view/44201/43075Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadaniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, José Antonio Puppim de2019-05-31T12:52:40Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/44201Revistahttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/cgpc/indexPRIhttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/cgpc/oaicadernosgpc-edicao@fgv.br||cadernosgpc-edicao@fgv.br2236-57101806-2261opendoar:2019-05-31T12:52:40Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analyzing the infl uence of economics on management education and practice: a criticism through the concept of development
title Analyzing the infl uence of economics on management education and practice: a criticism through the concept of development
spellingShingle Analyzing the infl uence of economics on management education and practice: a criticism through the concept of development
Oliveira, José Antonio Puppim de
title_short Analyzing the infl uence of economics on management education and practice: a criticism through the concept of development
title_full Analyzing the infl uence of economics on management education and practice: a criticism through the concept of development
title_fullStr Analyzing the infl uence of economics on management education and practice: a criticism through the concept of development
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing the infl uence of economics on management education and practice: a criticism through the concept of development
title_sort Analyzing the infl uence of economics on management education and practice: a criticism through the concept of development
author Oliveira, José Antonio Puppim de
author_facet Oliveira, José Antonio Puppim de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, José Antonio Puppim de
description This article is a criticism of the neoclassical economics infl uence on theories of management using the experience and lessons from the evolution of the debates in development studies. I argue that this infl uence has introduced values that are incompatible with the values of what could be a socially responsible society in a modern view of what is development. The article fi rstly examines the evolution of the debates of the concept of development, as they moved from being forums dominated exclusively by economists – who saw development as synonym of economic growth – to a multi and interdisciplinary debate over several dimensions of development, including social, environmental and democracy issues. Secondly, it criticizes management theories based on neoclassical economics through the experience of the development debate. I argue that management theories based on economics see the management solutions as a one-way alternative (market- based solutions), infl uence the thinking of both the means and the ends of organizations, and have propagated a series of values that are not compatible with a socially developed society.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/view/44201
10.12660/cgpc.v14n55.44201
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/view/44201
identifier_str_mv 10.12660/cgpc.v14n55.44201
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/view/44201/43075
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FGV EAESP Pesquisa e Publicações
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FGV EAESP Pesquisa e Publicações
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania; Vol. 14 No. 55 (2009): julho-dezembro
Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania; Vol. 14 Núm. 55 (2009): julho-dezembro
Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania; v. 14 n. 55 (2009): julho-dezembro
2236-5710
1806-2261
reponame:Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online)
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online)
collection Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosgpc-edicao@fgv.br||cadernosgpc-edicao@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943793869750272