If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing!
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração de Empresas |
Texto Completo: | https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325 |
Resumo: | The subject of “reviewing articles” is a relevant part of the daily life of every researcher. However, my experience as an editor and reviewer for Brazilian and international journals indicates that the level of commitment of researchers, in general, is much less when they are reviewing as compared to when they are authoring an article. The prestige of being published in a leading journal is not the same as being an outstanding reviewer in the same journal. Such asymmetry is contradictory, since peer review is the primary system that gauges the quality of scientific output and is as important for the survival of a journal as the submission of articles. The quality of the reviewers and their reviews must be equal or higher than the published articles in order to ensure the system’s credibility. |
id |
FGV-7_2dc21788fe9c91ddb746695adabe3b71 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:bibliotecadigital.fgv.br:article/75325 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-7 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração de Empresas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing!¡Si publicar es necesario, evaluar también es!Se publicar é preciso, avaliar também é!The subject of “reviewing articles” is a relevant part of the daily life of every researcher. However, my experience as an editor and reviewer for Brazilian and international journals indicates that the level of commitment of researchers, in general, is much less when they are reviewing as compared to when they are authoring an article. The prestige of being published in a leading journal is not the same as being an outstanding reviewer in the same journal. Such asymmetry is contradictory, since peer review is the primary system that gauges the quality of scientific output and is as important for the survival of a journal as the submission of articles. The quality of the reviewers and their reviews must be equal or higher than the published articles in order to ensure the system’s credibility.The subject of “reviewing articles” is a relevant part of the daily life of every researcher. However, my experience as an editor and reviewer for Brazilian and international journals indicates that the level of commitment of researchers, in general, is much less when they are reviewing as compared to when they are authoring an article. The prestige of being published in a leading journal is not the same as being an outstanding reviewer in the same journal. Such asymmetry is contradictory, since peer review is the primary system that gauges the quality of scientific output and is as important for the survival of a journal as the submission of articles. The quality of the reviewers and their reviews must be equal or higher than the published articles in order to ensure the system’s credibility.O tema “revisão de artigos” é relevante e faz parte do cotidiano de todo pesquisador. Entretanto, a minha experiência como editor e revisor em periódicos brasileiros e internacionais torna evidente que o comprometimento dos pesquisadores na função de revisores, em geral, é muito menor do que quando estão na posição de autores. O prestígio de publicar em um top journal não é o mesmo de ser um revisor de destaque no mesmo periódico. Tal assimetria é contraditória, uma vez que a revisão por pares é o principal sistema de aferição da qualidade da produção científica e é tão importante quanto a submissão de artigos para a sobrevivência de um periódico. A qualidade dos revisores e das revisões precisa ser de nível igual ou maior do que a dos artigos publicados para garantir a credibilidade do sistema.RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas RAE - Revista de Administração de EmpresasRAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/7532510.1590/S0034-759020180409RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas ; Vol. 58 No. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 438-442RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas; Vol. 58 Núm. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 438-442RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas; v. 58 n. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 438-4422178-938X0034-7590reponame:Revista de Administração de Empresasinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325/73516https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325/73517https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325/76024Copyright (c) 2018 RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBispo, Marcelo de Souza2019-06-06T20:12:03Zoai:bibliotecadigital.fgv.br:article/75325Revistahttps://rae.fgv.br/raeONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprae@fgv.br||ilda.fontes@fgv.br||raeredacao@fgv.br2178-938X0034-7590opendoar:2019-06-06T20:12:03Revista de Administração de Empresas - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing! ¡Si publicar es necesario, evaluar también es! Se publicar é preciso, avaliar também é! |
title |
If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing! |
spellingShingle |
If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing! Bispo, Marcelo de Souza |
title_short |
If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing! |
title_full |
If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing! |
title_fullStr |
If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing! |
title_full_unstemmed |
If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing! |
title_sort |
If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing! |
author |
Bispo, Marcelo de Souza |
author_facet |
Bispo, Marcelo de Souza |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bispo, Marcelo de Souza |
description |
The subject of “reviewing articles” is a relevant part of the daily life of every researcher. However, my experience as an editor and reviewer for Brazilian and international journals indicates that the level of commitment of researchers, in general, is much less when they are reviewing as compared to when they are authoring an article. The prestige of being published in a leading journal is not the same as being an outstanding reviewer in the same journal. Such asymmetry is contradictory, since peer review is the primary system that gauges the quality of scientific output and is as important for the survival of a journal as the submission of articles. The quality of the reviewers and their reviews must be equal or higher than the published articles in order to ensure the system’s credibility. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325 10.1590/S0034-759020180409 |
url |
https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-759020180409 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325/73516 https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325/73517 https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325/76024 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas ; Vol. 58 No. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 438-442 RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas; Vol. 58 Núm. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 438-442 RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas; v. 58 n. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 438-442 2178-938X 0034-7590 reponame:Revista de Administração de Empresas instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração de Empresas |
collection |
Revista de Administração de Empresas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração de Empresas - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rae@fgv.br||ilda.fontes@fgv.br||raeredacao@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1766160830207885312 |