If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing!

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bispo, Marcelo de Souza
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração de Empresas
Texto Completo: https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325
Resumo: The subject of “reviewing articles” is a relevant part of the daily life of every researcher. However, my experience as an editor and reviewer for Brazilian and international journals indicates that the level of commitment of researchers, in general, is much less when they are reviewing as compared to when they are authoring an article. The prestige of being published in a leading journal is not the same as being an outstanding reviewer in the same journal. Such asymmetry is contradictory, since peer review is the primary system that gauges the quality of scientific output and is as important for the survival of a journal as the submission of articles. The quality of the reviewers and their reviews must be equal or higher than the published articles in order to ensure the system’s credibility.
id FGV-7_2dc21788fe9c91ddb746695adabe3b71
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.fgv.br:article/75325
network_acronym_str FGV-7
network_name_str Revista de Administração de Empresas
repository_id_str
spelling If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing!¡Si publicar es necesario, evaluar también es!Se publicar é preciso, avaliar também é!The subject of “reviewing articles” is a relevant part of the daily life of every researcher. However, my experience as an editor and reviewer for Brazilian and international journals indicates that the level of commitment of researchers, in general, is much less when they are reviewing as compared to when they are authoring an article. The prestige of being published in a leading journal is not the same as being an outstanding reviewer in the same journal. Such asymmetry is contradictory, since peer review is the primary system that gauges the quality of scientific output and is as important for the survival of a journal as the submission of articles. The quality of the reviewers and their reviews must be equal or higher than the published articles in order to ensure the system’s credibility.The subject of “reviewing articles” is a relevant part of the daily life of every researcher. However, my experience as an editor and reviewer for Brazilian and international journals indicates that the level of commitment of researchers, in general, is much less when they are reviewing as compared to when they are authoring an article. The prestige of being published in a leading journal is not the same as being an outstanding reviewer in the same journal. Such asymmetry is contradictory, since peer review is the primary system that gauges the quality of scientific output and is as important for the survival of a journal as the submission of articles. The quality of the reviewers and their reviews must be equal or higher than the published articles in order to ensure the system’s credibility.O tema “revisão de artigos” é relevante e faz parte do cotidiano de todo pesquisador. Entretanto, a minha experiência como editor e revisor em periódicos brasileiros e internacionais torna evidente que o comprometimento dos pesquisadores na função de revisores, em geral, é muito menor do que quando estão na posição de autores. O prestígio de publicar em um top journal não é o mesmo de ser um revisor de destaque no mesmo periódico. Tal assimetria é contraditória, uma vez que a revisão por pares é o principal sistema de aferição da qualidade da produção científica e é tão importante quanto a submissão de artigos para a sobrevivência de um periódico. A qualidade dos revisores e das revisões precisa ser de nível igual ou maior do que a dos artigos publicados para garantir a credibilidade do sistema.RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas RAE - Revista de Administração de EmpresasRAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/7532510.1590/S0034-759020180409RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas ; Vol. 58 No. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 438-442RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas; Vol. 58 Núm. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 438-442RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas; v. 58 n. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 438-4422178-938X0034-7590reponame:Revista de Administração de Empresasinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325/73516https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325/73517https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325/76024Copyright (c) 2018 RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBispo, Marcelo de Souza2019-06-06T20:12:03Zoai:bibliotecadigital.fgv.br:article/75325Revistahttps://rae.fgv.br/raeONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprae@fgv.br||ilda.fontes@fgv.br||raeredacao@fgv.br2178-938X0034-7590opendoar:2019-06-06T20:12:03Revista de Administração de Empresas - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing!
¡Si publicar es necesario, evaluar también es!
Se publicar é preciso, avaliar também é!
title If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing!
spellingShingle If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing!
Bispo, Marcelo de Souza
title_short If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing!
title_full If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing!
title_fullStr If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing!
title_full_unstemmed If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing!
title_sort If publishing is necessary, so is reviewing!
author Bispo, Marcelo de Souza
author_facet Bispo, Marcelo de Souza
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bispo, Marcelo de Souza
description The subject of “reviewing articles” is a relevant part of the daily life of every researcher. However, my experience as an editor and reviewer for Brazilian and international journals indicates that the level of commitment of researchers, in general, is much less when they are reviewing as compared to when they are authoring an article. The prestige of being published in a leading journal is not the same as being an outstanding reviewer in the same journal. Such asymmetry is contradictory, since peer review is the primary system that gauges the quality of scientific output and is as important for the survival of a journal as the submission of articles. The quality of the reviewers and their reviews must be equal or higher than the published articles in order to ensure the system’s credibility.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325
10.1590/S0034-759020180409
url https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-759020180409
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325/73516
https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325/73517
https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rae/article/view/75325/76024
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas
RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas
RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas
RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas
RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RAE - Revista de Administracao de Empresas ; Vol. 58 No. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 438-442
RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas; Vol. 58 Núm. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 438-442
RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas; v. 58 n. 4 (2018): julho-agosto; 438-442
2178-938X
0034-7590
reponame:Revista de Administração de Empresas
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração de Empresas
collection Revista de Administração de Empresas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração de Empresas - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rae@fgv.br||ilda.fontes@fgv.br||raeredacao@fgv.br
_version_ 1766160830207885312