Aligning academic research and Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&I): a proposal using Design Science
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/81802 |
Resumo: | Universities have been criticized for the lack of integration of academic research with societies’ demands. This theoretical essay reflects on the use of the Design Science approach to align academic research with activities of science, technology, and innovation (ST&I) addressing societal needs. The study presents a theoretical background on new forms of evaluation of academic research and on the foundations of Design Science in relation to other research approaches, highlighting its ontological, epistemological, methodological, and axiological assumptions. Finally, we present a conceptual model of Design Science and its potential utility for new forms of scientific and technological production, considering the cycles of relevance, design, and rigor. We also highlight the importance of the Design Science Research (DSR) in conducting result-oriented studies. Such a perspective can foster new reflections and debates in the academic field about alternative ways to develop and evaluate scientific and technological research. |
id |
FGV-9_00726bb73c937d8ccb5ee968d9830c59 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/81802 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Aligning academic research and Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&I): a proposal using Design ScienceInvestigación académica y avances en ciencia, tecnología e innovación (CT&I): una propuesta de aproximación por la design sciencePesquisa acadêmica e avanços em Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (CT&I): uma proposta de aproximação pela Design ScienceDesign Science. ST&I. Academic research. University. Innovation.Design science. CT&I. Investigación académica. Universidad. Innovación.Design Science. CT&I. Pesquisa acadêmica. Universidade. Inovação.Universities have been criticized for the lack of integration of academic research with societies’ demands. This theoretical essay reflects on the use of the Design Science approach to align academic research with activities of science, technology, and innovation (ST&I) addressing societal needs. The study presents a theoretical background on new forms of evaluation of academic research and on the foundations of Design Science in relation to other research approaches, highlighting its ontological, epistemological, methodological, and axiological assumptions. Finally, we present a conceptual model of Design Science and its potential utility for new forms of scientific and technological production, considering the cycles of relevance, design, and rigor. We also highlight the importance of the Design Science Research (DSR) in conducting result-oriented studies. Such a perspective can foster new reflections and debates in the academic field about alternative ways to develop and evaluate scientific and technological research.Varias críticas han sido atribuidas a las universidades por la falta de integración de la investigación académica con las demandas de la sociedad. El objetivo de este ensayo teórico es reflexionar sobre el uso de la design science como un enfoque capaz de contribuir a una aproximación de la investigación académica con actividades relacionadas con ciencia, tecnología e innovación (CT&I), alineando los esfuerzos de la academia con las necesidades de la sociedad. Para esto, se presenta una base teórica sobre nuevas formas de evaluación de la investigación académica, así como los fundamentos de la design science en relación con otros enfoques de investigación, destacando sus supuestos ontológicos, epistemológicos, metodológicos y axiológicos. Finalmente, presentamos un modelo conceptual de design science y su utilidad potencial para nuevas formas de producción científica y tecnológica, considerando los ciclos de relevancia, diseño y rigor, así como destacando la importancia del método design science (DSR) en la realización de investigaciones orientadas por el uso de los resultados. Tal perspectiva puede despertar nuevas reflexiones y debates en el campo académico sobre formas alternativas para el desarrollo y la evaluación de la investigación científica y tecnológica.Diversas críticas têm sido atribuídas às universidades pela falta de integração das pesquisas acadêmicas com as demandas da sociedade. Assim, o objetivo deste ensaio teórico é refletir sobre a utilização da Design Science como abordagem capaz de contribuir para uma aproximação das pesquisas acadêmicas com as atividades de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (CT&I), alinhando os esforços da academia às necessidades da sociedade. Para tanto, é apresentado um background teórico sobre novas formas de avaliação da pesquisa acadêmica, assim como os fundamentos da Design Science em relação aos de outras abordagens de pesquisa, destacando seus pressupostos ontológicos, epistemológicos, metodológicos e axiológicos. Por fim, são apresentados um modelo conceitual da Design Science e sua potencial utilidade para novas formas de produção científica e tecnológica, considerando os ciclos de relevância, design e rigor e ressaltando a importância do método Design Science (DSR) na condução de pesquisas orientadas pelo uso dos resultados. Tal perspectiva pode despertar novas reflexões e debates no ambiente acadêmico sobre formas alternativas para o desenvolvimento e a avaliação de pesquisas científicas e tecnológicas.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2020-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/8180210.1590/1679-395120190039Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 18 No. 3 (2020); 459-472Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 18 Núm. 3 (2020); 459-472Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 18 n. 3 (2020); 459-4721679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/81802/77990https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/81802/77991Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Donizeti Leandro deSouza, Thais Assis deZambalde, Andre Luiz2022-07-08T19:31:26Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/81802Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T10:00:13.858272Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Aligning academic research and Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&I): a proposal using Design Science Investigación académica y avances en ciencia, tecnología e innovación (CT&I): una propuesta de aproximación por la design science Pesquisa acadêmica e avanços em Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (CT&I): uma proposta de aproximação pela Design Science |
title |
Aligning academic research and Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&I): a proposal using Design Science |
spellingShingle |
Aligning academic research and Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&I): a proposal using Design Science Souza, Donizeti Leandro de Design Science. ST&I. Academic research. University. Innovation. Design science. CT&I. Investigación académica. Universidad. Innovación. Design Science. CT&I. Pesquisa acadêmica. Universidade. Inovação. |
title_short |
Aligning academic research and Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&I): a proposal using Design Science |
title_full |
Aligning academic research and Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&I): a proposal using Design Science |
title_fullStr |
Aligning academic research and Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&I): a proposal using Design Science |
title_full_unstemmed |
Aligning academic research and Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&I): a proposal using Design Science |
title_sort |
Aligning academic research and Science, Technology, and Innovation (ST&I): a proposal using Design Science |
author |
Souza, Donizeti Leandro de |
author_facet |
Souza, Donizeti Leandro de Souza, Thais Assis de Zambalde, Andre Luiz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Thais Assis de Zambalde, Andre Luiz |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Donizeti Leandro de Souza, Thais Assis de Zambalde, Andre Luiz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Design Science. ST&I. Academic research. University. Innovation. Design science. CT&I. Investigación académica. Universidad. Innovación. Design Science. CT&I. Pesquisa acadêmica. Universidade. Inovação. |
topic |
Design Science. ST&I. Academic research. University. Innovation. Design science. CT&I. Investigación académica. Universidad. Innovación. Design Science. CT&I. Pesquisa acadêmica. Universidade. Inovação. |
description |
Universities have been criticized for the lack of integration of academic research with societies’ demands. This theoretical essay reflects on the use of the Design Science approach to align academic research with activities of science, technology, and innovation (ST&I) addressing societal needs. The study presents a theoretical background on new forms of evaluation of academic research and on the foundations of Design Science in relation to other research approaches, highlighting its ontological, epistemological, methodological, and axiological assumptions. Finally, we present a conceptual model of Design Science and its potential utility for new forms of scientific and technological production, considering the cycles of relevance, design, and rigor. We also highlight the importance of the Design Science Research (DSR) in conducting result-oriented studies. Such a perspective can foster new reflections and debates in the academic field about alternative ways to develop and evaluate scientific and technological research. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/81802 10.1590/1679-395120190039 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/81802 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1679-395120190039 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/81802/77990 https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/81802/77991 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos EBAPE.BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 18 No. 3 (2020); 459-472 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 18 Núm. 3 (2020); 459-472 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 18 n. 3 (2020); 459-472 1679-3951 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943212515098624 |