From translation to enactment: contributions of the Actor-Network Theory to the processual approach to organizations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31412 |
Resumo: | In the area of Administration, especially in the Organizational Studies (OS), the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) has been regarded as part of amovement that aims to leave the functional emphasis of organization and pursue the study of process and practices of organizing – the processualapproach to organizations. However, criticism to the ANT has led some authors to seek to overcome them through analytical twists concerning certain concepts. One of these “twists” involved the concept of translation and the inclusion of the concept of enactment. This article discusses both notions with the aid of two studies developed having these concepts as a basis, in order to indicate that the choice of enactment brings along a processual view different from that observed in translation. The concept of translation addresses the predominant and it emphasizes understanding how networks of relationships and objects become “stable”; in turn, enact works with multiplicity and fluidity, where the process takes precedence over things. Although the proposed term enactment does not seek to directly face all criticism, it contributes so that ANT does not take a neutral or mechanical view in its analyses and descriptions. Enactment has the view of organization as a result and product of continuous process and it allows understanding that this is not just working or not (success or failure), but it concerns the “production” of multiple realities when we conduct research in Administration having the processual approach to organizations as a basis. |
id |
FGV-9_284846e72813b340b018413f19b54b45 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/31412 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
From translation to enactment: contributions of the Actor-Network Theory to the processual approach to organizationsDe la traslación para el ‘enactar’: contribuciones de la Teoría Actor-Red para el abordaje procesual de las organizacionesDa translação para o enactar: contribuições da Teoria Ator-Rede para a abordagem processual das organizaçõesTranslation. Enactment. Process. Actor-network theory.Traslación. ‘Enactment’. Proceso. Teoría Actor-Red.Translação. Enactment. Processo. Teoria ator-redeIn the area of Administration, especially in the Organizational Studies (OS), the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) has been regarded as part of amovement that aims to leave the functional emphasis of organization and pursue the study of process and practices of organizing – the processualapproach to organizations. However, criticism to the ANT has led some authors to seek to overcome them through analytical twists concerning certain concepts. One of these “twists” involved the concept of translation and the inclusion of the concept of enactment. This article discusses both notions with the aid of two studies developed having these concepts as a basis, in order to indicate that the choice of enactment brings along a processual view different from that observed in translation. The concept of translation addresses the predominant and it emphasizes understanding how networks of relationships and objects become “stable”; in turn, enact works with multiplicity and fluidity, where the process takes precedence over things. Although the proposed term enactment does not seek to directly face all criticism, it contributes so that ANT does not take a neutral or mechanical view in its analyses and descriptions. Enactment has the view of organization as a result and product of continuous process and it allows understanding that this is not just working or not (success or failure), but it concerns the “production” of multiple realities when we conduct research in Administration having the processual approach to organizations as a basis.En el área de Administración, en especial en los Estudios Organizacionales (EO), la Teoría Actor-Red (TAR) ha sido considerada parte de un movimiento que pretende salir del énfasis funcional de la organización y buscar el estudio de procesos y prácticas de lo organizativo – el abordaje procesual de las organizaciones. Sin embargo, las críticas a la TAR llevaron algunos autores a buscar superarlas por medio de giros analíticos con relación a ciertos conceptos. Uno de esos ‘giros’ implicó el concepto de traslación y la inclusión del concepto de ‘enactment’. Este artículo discute ambas nociones con la ayuda de dos estudios desarrollados con base en estos conceptos, para indicar que la elección del ‘enactment’ trae consigo una visión procesual distinta de la presentada en la traslación. El concepto de traslación trata de lo predominante y enfatiza la comprensión de cómo las redes de relaciones y los objetos se vuelven ‘estables’; mientras el ‘enactar’ trabaja con la multiplicidad y la fluidez, donde el proceso tiene primacía sobre las cosas. Aunque la propuesta del concepto ‘enactment’ no busque enfrentar directamente todas las críticas, contribuye para que la TAR no asuma una visión neutra ni mecánica en sus análisis y descripciones. El ‘enactment’ presenta la visión de organización como resultado y producto de procesos continuos y posibilita comprender que no se trata que sea correcto o no (éxito o fracaso), sino que se trata de la ‘producción’ de realidades múltiples al realizar investigaciones en Administración con base en el abordaje procesual de las organizaciones.Na área da Administração, em especial nos Estudos Organizacionais (EO), a Teoria Ator-Rede (TAR) tem sido considerada parte de um movimentoque almeja sair da ênfase funcional da organização e buscar o estudo de processos e práticas do organizar – a abordagem processual das organizações. Entretanto, as críticas à TAR levaram alguns autores a buscar superá-las por meio de torções analíticas em relação a certosconceitos. Uma dessas “torções” envolveu o conceito de translação e a inclusão do conceito de enactment. Este artigo discute ambas as noções com o auxílio de dois estudos desenvolvidos com base nesses conceitos, para indicar que a escolha do enactment traz consigo uma visão processual distinta da apresentada na translação. O conceito de translação trata do predominante e enfatiza a compreensão de como as redes de relações e os objetos tornam-se “estáveis”; já o enactar trabalha com a multiplicidade e a fluidez, onde o processo tem primazia sobre as coisas. Embora a proposta do termo enactment não busque enfrentar diretamente todas as críticas, ele contribui para que a TAR não assuma uma visão neutra nem mecânica em suas análises e descrições. O enactment apresenta a visão de organização como resultado e produto de processos contínuos e possibilita compreender que não se trata de dar certo ou não (sucesso ou fracasso), mas se trata da “produção” de realidades múltiplas ao realizarmos pesquisas em Administração com base na abordagem processual das organizações.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2016-03-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31412Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2016) - Epistemology and Sociology Science of Administration; 61 a 82Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2016) - Epistemología y Sociología de la Ciencia de la Administración; 61 a 82Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 14 n. 1 (2016) - Epistemologia e Sociologia da Ciência da Administração; 61 a 821679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31412/56900Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCamillis, Patricia Kinast DeAntonello, Claudia Simone2023-02-23T19:21:25Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/31412Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:53.712678Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
From translation to enactment: contributions of the Actor-Network Theory to the processual approach to organizations De la traslación para el ‘enactar’: contribuciones de la Teoría Actor-Red para el abordaje procesual de las organizaciones Da translação para o enactar: contribuições da Teoria Ator-Rede para a abordagem processual das organizações |
title |
From translation to enactment: contributions of the Actor-Network Theory to the processual approach to organizations |
spellingShingle |
From translation to enactment: contributions of the Actor-Network Theory to the processual approach to organizations Camillis, Patricia Kinast De Translation. Enactment. Process. Actor-network theory. Traslación. ‘Enactment’. Proceso. Teoría Actor-Red. Translação. Enactment. Processo. Teoria ator-rede |
title_short |
From translation to enactment: contributions of the Actor-Network Theory to the processual approach to organizations |
title_full |
From translation to enactment: contributions of the Actor-Network Theory to the processual approach to organizations |
title_fullStr |
From translation to enactment: contributions of the Actor-Network Theory to the processual approach to organizations |
title_full_unstemmed |
From translation to enactment: contributions of the Actor-Network Theory to the processual approach to organizations |
title_sort |
From translation to enactment: contributions of the Actor-Network Theory to the processual approach to organizations |
author |
Camillis, Patricia Kinast De |
author_facet |
Camillis, Patricia Kinast De Antonello, Claudia Simone |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Antonello, Claudia Simone |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Camillis, Patricia Kinast De Antonello, Claudia Simone |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Translation. Enactment. Process. Actor-network theory. Traslación. ‘Enactment’. Proceso. Teoría Actor-Red. Translação. Enactment. Processo. Teoria ator-rede |
topic |
Translation. Enactment. Process. Actor-network theory. Traslación. ‘Enactment’. Proceso. Teoría Actor-Red. Translação. Enactment. Processo. Teoria ator-rede |
description |
In the area of Administration, especially in the Organizational Studies (OS), the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) has been regarded as part of amovement that aims to leave the functional emphasis of organization and pursue the study of process and practices of organizing – the processualapproach to organizations. However, criticism to the ANT has led some authors to seek to overcome them through analytical twists concerning certain concepts. One of these “twists” involved the concept of translation and the inclusion of the concept of enactment. This article discusses both notions with the aid of two studies developed having these concepts as a basis, in order to indicate that the choice of enactment brings along a processual view different from that observed in translation. The concept of translation addresses the predominant and it emphasizes understanding how networks of relationships and objects become “stable”; in turn, enact works with multiplicity and fluidity, where the process takes precedence over things. Although the proposed term enactment does not seek to directly face all criticism, it contributes so that ANT does not take a neutral or mechanical view in its analyses and descriptions. Enactment has the view of organization as a result and product of continuous process and it allows understanding that this is not just working or not (success or failure), but it concerns the “production” of multiple realities when we conduct research in Administration having the processual approach to organizations as a basis. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31412 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31412 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31412/56900 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos EBAPE.BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2016) - Epistemology and Sociology Science of Administration; 61 a 82 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2016) - Epistemología y Sociología de la Ciencia de la Administración; 61 a 82 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 14 n. 1 (2016) - Epistemologia e Sociologia da Ciência da Administração; 61 a 82 1679-3951 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943210105470976 |