“Rio+20: What we can learn from the process and what is missing”

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, José A. Puppim de
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5476
Resumo: The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) took place in the city of Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and put the concept of Sustainable Development definitively on policy agendas at all levels from global to local. Twenty years later, even though important progress has been made in several areas, the world still struggles to implement the decisions following up the UNCED and to steer humanity towards a more sustainable path. The UN has set two broad themes for the Earth Summit in 2012, or Rio+20: institutional framework for sustainable development (IFSD) and green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication. This article makes an overall analysis of the discussions generated by Rio+20. The article starts with a short overview of the debates on sustainable development since the UNCED, until the recent debates on green economy and institutional frameworks for sustainable development. It then highlights some lessons from the discussions catalyzed by Rio+20 analysing why and how progress has been achieved in certain areas and what the obstacles are to move the agenda of green economy and good environmental governance forward to achieve a more sustainable development. It concludes that, besides the tremendous obstacles to implement the agenda on green economy and IFSD, these themes brought about in Rio+20 are still lacking conceptually in the discussions on important topics such as equity and need to changes in values, as well as the debates on governance beyond the international level.
id FGV-9_2fec1299a526e3c63574aae6170c122d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/5476
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling “Rio+20: What we can learn from the process and what is missing”“Rio+20: O que podemos aprender com o processo de discussão e o que está faltando”The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) took place in the city of Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and put the concept of Sustainable Development definitively on policy agendas at all levels from global to local. Twenty years later, even though important progress has been made in several areas, the world still struggles to implement the decisions following up the UNCED and to steer humanity towards a more sustainable path. The UN has set two broad themes for the Earth Summit in 2012, or Rio+20: institutional framework for sustainable development (IFSD) and green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication. This article makes an overall analysis of the discussions generated by Rio+20. The article starts with a short overview of the debates on sustainable development since the UNCED, until the recent debates on green economy and institutional frameworks for sustainable development. It then highlights some lessons from the discussions catalyzed by Rio+20 analysing why and how progress has been achieved in certain areas and what the obstacles are to move the agenda of green economy and good environmental governance forward to achieve a more sustainable development. It concludes that, besides the tremendous obstacles to implement the agenda on green economy and IFSD, these themes brought about in Rio+20 are still lacking conceptually in the discussions on important topics such as equity and need to changes in values, as well as the debates on governance beyond the international level.A Conferência das Nações Unidas para o Meio Ambiente e o Desenvolvimento (CNUMAD), ou Rio-92 ou Eco-92, que aconteceu na cidade do Rio de Janeiro, colocou o conceito de Desenvolvimento Sustentável definitivamente na agenda política, em todos os níveis, do global ao local. Vinte anos depois, embora avanços importantes tenham sido feitos em várias áreas, o mundo ainda tem dificuldades para implementar a agenda da CNUMAD e direcionar a humanidade para um desenvolvimento mais sustentável. Assim, a ONU determinou dois temas como o foco da Cimeira da Terra em 2012, ou Rio+20: Arcabouço Institucional para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável (IFSD em inglês) e economia verde no contexto de desenvolvimento sustentável e erradicação da pobreza. Este artigo faz uma análise geral das discussões geradas pela Rio+20. O artigo começa com uma revisão dos debates desde a CNUMAD, incluindo as discussões recentes sobre os dois temas da Rio+20. O texto avança com uma análise dos debates da Rio+20 examinando porque e como a agenda avançou em certas áreas e quais os obstáculos para avançar a agenda da economia verde e boa governança ambiental para atingir um desenvolvimento mais sustentável. O artigo conclui que, além dos enormes obstáculos para implementar a agenda da economia verde e IFSD, existem ainda lacunas conceituais nas discussões, por exemplo temas como equidade e necessidade de mudança de valores, como também o aprofundamento das discussões de governança além do plano internacional.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2012-09-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5476Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2012) - RIO+20; 492 a 507Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 10 Núm. 3 (2012) - RIO+20; 492 a 507Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 10 n. 3 (2012) - RIO+20; 492 a 5071679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5476/4198Oliveira, José A. Puppim deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-02-23T19:25:18Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/5476Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:41.667604Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “Rio+20: What we can learn from the process and what is missing”
“Rio+20: O que podemos aprender com o processo de discussão e o que está faltando”
title “Rio+20: What we can learn from the process and what is missing”
spellingShingle “Rio+20: What we can learn from the process and what is missing”
Oliveira, José A. Puppim de
title_short “Rio+20: What we can learn from the process and what is missing”
title_full “Rio+20: What we can learn from the process and what is missing”
title_fullStr “Rio+20: What we can learn from the process and what is missing”
title_full_unstemmed “Rio+20: What we can learn from the process and what is missing”
title_sort “Rio+20: What we can learn from the process and what is missing”
author Oliveira, José A. Puppim de
author_facet Oliveira, José A. Puppim de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, José A. Puppim de
description The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) took place in the city of Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and put the concept of Sustainable Development definitively on policy agendas at all levels from global to local. Twenty years later, even though important progress has been made in several areas, the world still struggles to implement the decisions following up the UNCED and to steer humanity towards a more sustainable path. The UN has set two broad themes for the Earth Summit in 2012, or Rio+20: institutional framework for sustainable development (IFSD) and green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication. This article makes an overall analysis of the discussions generated by Rio+20. The article starts with a short overview of the debates on sustainable development since the UNCED, until the recent debates on green economy and institutional frameworks for sustainable development. It then highlights some lessons from the discussions catalyzed by Rio+20 analysing why and how progress has been achieved in certain areas and what the obstacles are to move the agenda of green economy and good environmental governance forward to achieve a more sustainable development. It concludes that, besides the tremendous obstacles to implement the agenda on green economy and IFSD, these themes brought about in Rio+20 are still lacking conceptually in the discussions on important topics such as equity and need to changes in values, as well as the debates on governance beyond the international level.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-09-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5476
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5476
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5476/4198
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2012) - RIO+20; 492 a 507
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 10 Núm. 3 (2012) - RIO+20; 492 a 507
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 10 n. 3 (2012) - RIO+20; 492 a 507
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943208590278656