Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Everton Rodrigues da
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Toledo, Dimitri Augusto da Cunha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31382
Resumo: This article, prepared through Robert Cooper’s contributions, seek to think of an organizational ontology that moves away from the theoretical conceptions of administration linked to modern science, getting closer to a postmodern perspective. After a brief contextualization of the theme, we introduce the conceptual principles that ground modern thinking and their implications to organizational theorization, as well as their limitations. Next, we describe foundations from the postmodern viewpoint and their unfolding. Finally, we suggest that organizations are recognized as multiple inventive events, which surprise in relation to what was predicted and accentuate the emergent character of social reality. Cooper’s ideas give rise to an epistemology focused on describing and interpreting the organization as a process, i.e. capturing the organizational ethnographic moment. Organizations, as empirical objects, keep living, active, hybrid, fragmented. As Bruno Latour might say, we have never been modern and our organizations were not or are not modern as well.
id FGV-9_36c618d72d276586704b36742a5bb535
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/31382
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontologyLas contribuciones de Robert Cooper al debate sobre la ontología organizacionalAs contribuições de Robert Cooper para o debate sobre ontologia organizacionalOrganizational ontology. Organization/disorganization. Postmodernism. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.Ontología Organizacional. Organización/desorganización. Posmodernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.Ontologia organizacional. Organização/desorganização. Pós-modernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.This article, prepared through Robert Cooper’s contributions, seek to think of an organizational ontology that moves away from the theoretical conceptions of administration linked to modern science, getting closer to a postmodern perspective. After a brief contextualization of the theme, we introduce the conceptual principles that ground modern thinking and their implications to organizational theorization, as well as their limitations. Next, we describe foundations from the postmodern viewpoint and their unfolding. Finally, we suggest that organizations are recognized as multiple inventive events, which surprise in relation to what was predicted and accentuate the emergent character of social reality. Cooper’s ideas give rise to an epistemology focused on describing and interpreting the organization as a process, i.e. capturing the organizational ethnographic moment. Organizations, as empirical objects, keep living, active, hybrid, fragmented. As Bruno Latour might say, we have never been modern and our organizations were not or are not modern as well.Este trabajo, elaborado desde las contribuciones de Robert Cooper, busca pensar una ontología organizacional que se aleje de las concepciones teóricas de la administración asociadas con la ciencia moderna, acercándose a una perspectiva posmoderna. Después de una contextualización del tema, empezamos a presentar los principios conceptuales que subyacen el pensamiento moderno y sus implicaciones para la teorización organizacional, así como sus limitaciones. Entonces describimos las bases de la perspectiva posmoderna y sus consecuencias. Finalizamos sugiriendo que las organizaciones sean reconocidas como acontecimientos inventivos múltiples, que sorprenden los planes y acentúan el carácter emergente de la realidad social. Las ideas de Cooper suscitan a una epistemología enfocada en la descripción y comprensión de la organización como un proceso, es decir, en la captura del presente etnográfico organizacional. Las organizaciones, como objetos empíricos, continúan vivas, activas, híbridas, fragmentadas. Como dice Bruno Latour, jamás hemos sido modernos, y nuestras organizaciones tampoco han sido o son modernas.Este artigo, elaborado a partir das contribuições de Robert Cooper, busca pensar uma ontologia organizacional que se distancie das concepções teóricas da administração ligadas à ciência moderna, aproximando-se de uma perspectiva pós-moderna. Após breve contextualização do tema, apresentamos os princípios conceituais que fundamentam o pensamento moderno e suas implicações para a teorização organizacional, bem como suas limitações. Em seguida, descrevemos as bases do ponto de vista pós-moderno e seus desdobramentos. Finalizamos sugerindo que as organizações sejam reconhecidas como acontecimentos inventivos múltiplos, que surpreendem o previsto e acentuam o caráter emergente da realidade social. As ideias de Cooper suscitam uma epistemologia focada na descrição e interpretação da organização como processo, isto é, na captura do presente etnográfico organizacional. As organizações, sendo objetos empíricos, prosseguem vivas, ativas, híbridas, fragmentadas. Como diria Bruno Latour, jamais fomos modernos e nossas organizações também não foram ou não são modernas.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2016-03-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31382Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2016) - Epistemology and Sociology Science of Administration; 116 a 134Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2016) - Epistemología y Sociología de la Ciencia de la Administración; 116 a 134Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 14 n. 1 (2016) - Epistemologia e Sociologia da Ciência da Administração; 116 a 1341679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31382/56910Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Everton Rodrigues daToledo, Dimitri Augusto da Cunha2023-02-23T19:21:25Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/31382Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:53.532558Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology
Las contribuciones de Robert Cooper al debate sobre la ontología organizacional
As contribuições de Robert Cooper para o debate sobre ontologia organizacional
title Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology
spellingShingle Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology
Silva, Everton Rodrigues da
Organizational ontology. Organization/disorganization. Postmodernism. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.
Ontología Organizacional. Organización/desorganización. Posmodernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.
Ontologia organizacional. Organização/desorganização. Pós-modernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.
title_short Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology
title_full Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology
title_fullStr Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology
title_full_unstemmed Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology
title_sort Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology
author Silva, Everton Rodrigues da
author_facet Silva, Everton Rodrigues da
Toledo, Dimitri Augusto da Cunha
author_role author
author2 Toledo, Dimitri Augusto da Cunha
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Everton Rodrigues da
Toledo, Dimitri Augusto da Cunha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Organizational ontology. Organization/disorganization. Postmodernism. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.
Ontología Organizacional. Organización/desorganización. Posmodernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.
Ontologia organizacional. Organização/desorganização. Pós-modernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.
topic Organizational ontology. Organization/disorganization. Postmodernism. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.
Ontología Organizacional. Organización/desorganización. Posmodernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.
Ontologia organizacional. Organização/desorganização. Pós-modernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.
description This article, prepared through Robert Cooper’s contributions, seek to think of an organizational ontology that moves away from the theoretical conceptions of administration linked to modern science, getting closer to a postmodern perspective. After a brief contextualization of the theme, we introduce the conceptual principles that ground modern thinking and their implications to organizational theorization, as well as their limitations. Next, we describe foundations from the postmodern viewpoint and their unfolding. Finally, we suggest that organizations are recognized as multiple inventive events, which surprise in relation to what was predicted and accentuate the emergent character of social reality. Cooper’s ideas give rise to an epistemology focused on describing and interpreting the organization as a process, i.e. capturing the organizational ethnographic moment. Organizations, as empirical objects, keep living, active, hybrid, fragmented. As Bruno Latour might say, we have never been modern and our organizations were not or are not modern as well.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31382
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31382
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31382/56910
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2016) - Epistemology and Sociology Science of Administration; 116 a 134
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2016) - Epistemología y Sociología de la Ciencia de la Administración; 116 a 134
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 14 n. 1 (2016) - Epistemologia e Sociologia da Ciência da Administração; 116 a 134
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943210096033792