Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31382 |
Resumo: | This article, prepared through Robert Cooper’s contributions, seek to think of an organizational ontology that moves away from the theoretical conceptions of administration linked to modern science, getting closer to a postmodern perspective. After a brief contextualization of the theme, we introduce the conceptual principles that ground modern thinking and their implications to organizational theorization, as well as their limitations. Next, we describe foundations from the postmodern viewpoint and their unfolding. Finally, we suggest that organizations are recognized as multiple inventive events, which surprise in relation to what was predicted and accentuate the emergent character of social reality. Cooper’s ideas give rise to an epistemology focused on describing and interpreting the organization as a process, i.e. capturing the organizational ethnographic moment. Organizations, as empirical objects, keep living, active, hybrid, fragmented. As Bruno Latour might say, we have never been modern and our organizations were not or are not modern as well. |
id |
FGV-9_36c618d72d276586704b36742a5bb535 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/31382 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontologyLas contribuciones de Robert Cooper al debate sobre la ontología organizacionalAs contribuições de Robert Cooper para o debate sobre ontologia organizacionalOrganizational ontology. Organization/disorganization. Postmodernism. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.Ontología Organizacional. Organización/desorganización. Posmodernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.Ontologia organizacional. Organização/desorganização. Pós-modernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida.This article, prepared through Robert Cooper’s contributions, seek to think of an organizational ontology that moves away from the theoretical conceptions of administration linked to modern science, getting closer to a postmodern perspective. After a brief contextualization of the theme, we introduce the conceptual principles that ground modern thinking and their implications to organizational theorization, as well as their limitations. Next, we describe foundations from the postmodern viewpoint and their unfolding. Finally, we suggest that organizations are recognized as multiple inventive events, which surprise in relation to what was predicted and accentuate the emergent character of social reality. Cooper’s ideas give rise to an epistemology focused on describing and interpreting the organization as a process, i.e. capturing the organizational ethnographic moment. Organizations, as empirical objects, keep living, active, hybrid, fragmented. As Bruno Latour might say, we have never been modern and our organizations were not or are not modern as well.Este trabajo, elaborado desde las contribuciones de Robert Cooper, busca pensar una ontología organizacional que se aleje de las concepciones teóricas de la administración asociadas con la ciencia moderna, acercándose a una perspectiva posmoderna. Después de una contextualización del tema, empezamos a presentar los principios conceptuales que subyacen el pensamiento moderno y sus implicaciones para la teorización organizacional, así como sus limitaciones. Entonces describimos las bases de la perspectiva posmoderna y sus consecuencias. Finalizamos sugiriendo que las organizaciones sean reconocidas como acontecimientos inventivos múltiples, que sorprenden los planes y acentúan el carácter emergente de la realidad social. Las ideas de Cooper suscitan a una epistemología enfocada en la descripción y comprensión de la organización como un proceso, es decir, en la captura del presente etnográfico organizacional. Las organizaciones, como objetos empíricos, continúan vivas, activas, híbridas, fragmentadas. Como dice Bruno Latour, jamás hemos sido modernos, y nuestras organizaciones tampoco han sido o son modernas.Este artigo, elaborado a partir das contribuições de Robert Cooper, busca pensar uma ontologia organizacional que se distancie das concepções teóricas da administração ligadas à ciência moderna, aproximando-se de uma perspectiva pós-moderna. Após breve contextualização do tema, apresentamos os princípios conceituais que fundamentam o pensamento moderno e suas implicações para a teorização organizacional, bem como suas limitações. Em seguida, descrevemos as bases do ponto de vista pós-moderno e seus desdobramentos. Finalizamos sugerindo que as organizações sejam reconhecidas como acontecimentos inventivos múltiplos, que surpreendem o previsto e acentuam o caráter emergente da realidade social. As ideias de Cooper suscitam uma epistemologia focada na descrição e interpretação da organização como processo, isto é, na captura do presente etnográfico organizacional. As organizações, sendo objetos empíricos, prosseguem vivas, ativas, híbridas, fragmentadas. Como diria Bruno Latour, jamais fomos modernos e nossas organizações também não foram ou não são modernas.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2016-03-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31382Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2016) - Epistemology and Sociology Science of Administration; 116 a 134Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2016) - Epistemología y Sociología de la Ciencia de la Administración; 116 a 134Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 14 n. 1 (2016) - Epistemologia e Sociologia da Ciência da Administração; 116 a 1341679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31382/56910Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Everton Rodrigues daToledo, Dimitri Augusto da Cunha2023-02-23T19:21:25Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/31382Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:53.532558Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology Las contribuciones de Robert Cooper al debate sobre la ontología organizacional As contribuições de Robert Cooper para o debate sobre ontologia organizacional |
title |
Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology |
spellingShingle |
Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology Silva, Everton Rodrigues da Organizational ontology. Organization/disorganization. Postmodernism. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida. Ontología Organizacional. Organización/desorganización. Posmodernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida. Ontologia organizacional. Organização/desorganização. Pós-modernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida. |
title_short |
Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology |
title_full |
Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology |
title_fullStr |
Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology |
title_sort |
Robert Cooper’s contributions to the debate on organizational ontology |
author |
Silva, Everton Rodrigues da |
author_facet |
Silva, Everton Rodrigues da Toledo, Dimitri Augusto da Cunha |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Toledo, Dimitri Augusto da Cunha |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Everton Rodrigues da Toledo, Dimitri Augusto da Cunha |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Organizational ontology. Organization/disorganization. Postmodernism. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida. Ontología Organizacional. Organización/desorganización. Posmodernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida. Ontologia organizacional. Organização/desorganização. Pós-modernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida. |
topic |
Organizational ontology. Organization/disorganization. Postmodernism. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida. Ontología Organizacional. Organización/desorganización. Posmodernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida. Ontologia organizacional. Organização/desorganização. Pós-modernismo. Robert Cooper. Jacques Derrida. |
description |
This article, prepared through Robert Cooper’s contributions, seek to think of an organizational ontology that moves away from the theoretical conceptions of administration linked to modern science, getting closer to a postmodern perspective. After a brief contextualization of the theme, we introduce the conceptual principles that ground modern thinking and their implications to organizational theorization, as well as their limitations. Next, we describe foundations from the postmodern viewpoint and their unfolding. Finally, we suggest that organizations are recognized as multiple inventive events, which surprise in relation to what was predicted and accentuate the emergent character of social reality. Cooper’s ideas give rise to an epistemology focused on describing and interpreting the organization as a process, i.e. capturing the organizational ethnographic moment. Organizations, as empirical objects, keep living, active, hybrid, fragmented. As Bruno Latour might say, we have never been modern and our organizations were not or are not modern as well. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31382 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31382 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/31382/56910 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos EBAPE.BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2016) - Epistemology and Sociology Science of Administration; 116 a 134 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2016) - Epistemología y Sociología de la Ciencia de la Administración; 116 a 134 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 14 n. 1 (2016) - Epistemologia e Sociologia da Ciência da Administração; 116 a 134 1679-3951 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943210096033792 |