Between emergency, submersion, and silence: LGBT as a research category in Administration

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paniza, Maurício Donavan Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/73482
Resumo: This article discusses the adoption of the abbreviation LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transvestite, and transsexual), questioning the representativeness of the groups contained in this acronym in Administration research. Some authors in Brazil state that, although there is the intention to construct a field of research on the subject, the agenda is mostly aimed at research on gay people (CARRIERI, SOUZA, and AGUIAR, 2014). Therefore, the research question is: Is it possible to treat identity categories that are so different under the same prism? The article is grounded on (1) a historical version of the constitution of LGBT groups, showing how they are organized and fragmented in Brazil (FACCHINI, 2005); (2) a discussion on the adoption of the LGBT acronym as a universal category, based on the debate about contingent identities (BUTLER, 1998); (3) a literature review of Brazilian Administration using the SPELL database. A total of 34 articles approaching LGBT groups were found. Research on gays predominates while groups of lesbians, transvestites, and transsexuals are underrepresented. It is perceived that, although there are similarities from the point of view that all the identity categories are targets of discrimination and violence (which is justified because they are categories considered deviant), the articles mark the differences between them. It is in these differences that there are possibilities for Administration research to question the adoption of acronyms, such as LGBT, as a universally representative and unified concept.
id FGV-9_52a68b49889312456abf7f2dcdaae81c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/73482
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling Between emergency, submersion, and silence: LGBT as a research category in AdministrationEntre la emergencia, la inmersión y el silencio: LGBT como categoría de estudio en AdministraciónEntre a emergência, a submersão e o silêncio: LGBT como categoria de pesquisa em AdministraçãoLGBT. Diversity. Inclusion. Sexuality. Gender identityLGBT. Diversidad. Inclusión. Sexualidad. Identidad de género.LGBT. Diversidade. Inclusão. Sexualidade. Identidade de gênero.This article discusses the adoption of the abbreviation LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transvestite, and transsexual), questioning the representativeness of the groups contained in this acronym in Administration research. Some authors in Brazil state that, although there is the intention to construct a field of research on the subject, the agenda is mostly aimed at research on gay people (CARRIERI, SOUZA, and AGUIAR, 2014). Therefore, the research question is: Is it possible to treat identity categories that are so different under the same prism? The article is grounded on (1) a historical version of the constitution of LGBT groups, showing how they are organized and fragmented in Brazil (FACCHINI, 2005); (2) a discussion on the adoption of the LGBT acronym as a universal category, based on the debate about contingent identities (BUTLER, 1998); (3) a literature review of Brazilian Administration using the SPELL database. A total of 34 articles approaching LGBT groups were found. Research on gays predominates while groups of lesbians, transvestites, and transsexuals are underrepresented. It is perceived that, although there are similarities from the point of view that all the identity categories are targets of discrimination and violence (which is justified because they are categories considered deviant), the articles mark the differences between them. It is in these differences that there are possibilities for Administration research to question the adoption of acronyms, such as LGBT, as a universally representative and unified concept.Este trabajo discute la adopción de la sigla LGBT (lesbianas, gays, bisexuales, travestis y transexuales) cuestionando la representatividad de los grupos contenidos en ese acrónimo en las investigaciones en Administración. En Brasil, aunque se pretenda construir un campo de investigación en el asunto, su agenda es mayoritariamente destinada a los estudios sobre gays (CARRIERI, SOUZA e AGUIAR, 2014). De forma más específica, el cuestionamiento es: ¿será posible tratar bajo el mismo prisma categorías identitarias tan distintas? La construcción del trabajo se basa en: (1) una versión histórica de la constitución de los grupos LGBT mostrando cómo se han organizado y fragmentado en Brasil (FACCHINI, 2005); (2) una discusión sobre la adopción de la sigla LGBT como categoría universal basada en el debate sobre identidades contingentes (BUTLER, 1998); (3) un levantamiento de literatura nacional sobre grupos LGBT en Administración en la base de datos Scientific Periodicals Electronic Library (SPELL). Se han encontrado 34 artículos sobre los grupos incluidos en la sigla LGBT. Los estudios sobre gays predominan mientras que grupos de lesbianas, travestis y transexuales están subrepresentados. Se percibe que, aunque haya similitudes desde el punto de vista de que todas estas categorías identitarias son blancos de discriminación y violencia, lo que se justifica por tratarse de categorías tenidas como desviantes, los estudios planteados demarcan las diferencias entre ellas. Es en esas diferencias que yacen las posibilidades de que del estudio en Administración cuestione la adopción de siglas (como LGBT) como concepto universalmente representativo y unificado.Este artigo discute a adoção da sigla LGBT (lésbicas, gays, bissexuais, travestis e transexuais), questionando a representatividade dos grupos que fazem parte desse acrônimo nas pesquisas em Administração. No Brasil, afirma-se que, embora se almeje construir um campo de pesquisas no assunto, sua agenda é majoritariamente destinada às pesquisas sobre gays (CARRIERI, SOUZA e AGUIAR, 2014). De modo mais específico, o questionamento é: será que é possível tratar sob o mesmo prisma categorias identitárias tão distintas? A construção do trabalho está embasada em: 1) uma versão histórica sobre a constituição dos grupos LGBT, principalmente no Brasil, evidenciando de que modo eles se organizaram e se fragmentaram (FACCHINI, 2005); 2) uma discussão sobre a adoção da sigla LGBT como categoria universal, embasada no debate sobre identidades contingentes (BUTLER, 1998); e 3) um levantamento de literatura nacional sobre grupos LGBT em Administração na base de dados Scientific Periodicals Electronic Library (SPELL). Foram encontrados 34 artigos sobre os grupos incluídos na sigla LGBT. Pesquisas sobre gays predominam enquanto grupos de lésbicas, travestis e transexuais estão sub-representados. Percebe-se que, embora haja similaridades do ponto de vista de que todas essas categorias identitárias são alvos de discriminação e violência – o que se justifica por se tratarem de categorias tidas como desviantes, as pesquisas levantadas demarcam as diferenças entre elas. É nessas diferenças que se encontram as possibilidades de a pesquisa em Administração questionar a adoção de siglas (como a LGBT) como conceitos universalmente representativos e unificados.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2020-01-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/7348210.1590/1679-395173482Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2020); 13-27Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2020); 13-27Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 18 n. 1 (2020); 13-271679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/73482/77314https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/73482/77318Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaniza, Maurício Donavan Rodrigues2022-07-08T20:19:17Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/73482Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T10:00:07.829395Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Between emergency, submersion, and silence: LGBT as a research category in Administration
Entre la emergencia, la inmersión y el silencio: LGBT como categoría de estudio en Administración
Entre a emergência, a submersão e o silêncio: LGBT como categoria de pesquisa em Administração
title Between emergency, submersion, and silence: LGBT as a research category in Administration
spellingShingle Between emergency, submersion, and silence: LGBT as a research category in Administration
Paniza, Maurício Donavan Rodrigues
LGBT. Diversity. Inclusion. Sexuality. Gender identity
LGBT. Diversidad. Inclusión. Sexualidad. Identidad de género.
LGBT. Diversidade. Inclusão. Sexualidade. Identidade de gênero.
title_short Between emergency, submersion, and silence: LGBT as a research category in Administration
title_full Between emergency, submersion, and silence: LGBT as a research category in Administration
title_fullStr Between emergency, submersion, and silence: LGBT as a research category in Administration
title_full_unstemmed Between emergency, submersion, and silence: LGBT as a research category in Administration
title_sort Between emergency, submersion, and silence: LGBT as a research category in Administration
author Paniza, Maurício Donavan Rodrigues
author_facet Paniza, Maurício Donavan Rodrigues
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paniza, Maurício Donavan Rodrigues
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv LGBT. Diversity. Inclusion. Sexuality. Gender identity
LGBT. Diversidad. Inclusión. Sexualidad. Identidad de género.
LGBT. Diversidade. Inclusão. Sexualidade. Identidade de gênero.
topic LGBT. Diversity. Inclusion. Sexuality. Gender identity
LGBT. Diversidad. Inclusión. Sexualidad. Identidad de género.
LGBT. Diversidade. Inclusão. Sexualidade. Identidade de gênero.
description This article discusses the adoption of the abbreviation LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transvestite, and transsexual), questioning the representativeness of the groups contained in this acronym in Administration research. Some authors in Brazil state that, although there is the intention to construct a field of research on the subject, the agenda is mostly aimed at research on gay people (CARRIERI, SOUZA, and AGUIAR, 2014). Therefore, the research question is: Is it possible to treat identity categories that are so different under the same prism? The article is grounded on (1) a historical version of the constitution of LGBT groups, showing how they are organized and fragmented in Brazil (FACCHINI, 2005); (2) a discussion on the adoption of the LGBT acronym as a universal category, based on the debate about contingent identities (BUTLER, 1998); (3) a literature review of Brazilian Administration using the SPELL database. A total of 34 articles approaching LGBT groups were found. Research on gays predominates while groups of lesbians, transvestites, and transsexuals are underrepresented. It is perceived that, although there are similarities from the point of view that all the identity categories are targets of discrimination and violence (which is justified because they are categories considered deviant), the articles mark the differences between them. It is in these differences that there are possibilities for Administration research to question the adoption of acronyms, such as LGBT, as a universally representative and unified concept.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/73482
10.1590/1679-395173482
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/73482
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1679-395173482
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/73482/77314
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/73482/77318
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2020); 13-27
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2020); 13-27
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 18 n. 1 (2020); 13-27
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943211792629760