WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512021000500901 |
Resumo: | Abstract We discuss an interplay between two theories by addressing the question: In what ways can the Justification theory (JT) complement the Stakeholder theory (ST)? While ST provides an insight on the importance of creating value for stakeholders without resorting to tradeoffs, it does not address how several stakeholders employ justifications to achieve their goals, nor does it explore the analytical thinking on how organizations and their stakeholders account for and negotiate behaviors during disputes. The JT provides a framework that interprets social interactions and tensions by considering that actors’ decisions and actions are contextualized within organizational reality. Several studies that apply the JT framework in the context of organizations do so by directly or indirectly analyzing stakeholders. Hence, this essay sheds light on how such an intersection may help to comprehend the phenomena related to disputes. The study offers tools and contributes to understanding managerial practices for stakeholders identification and engagement since, to the best of our knowledge, there is a research gap regarding the intersection between JT and ST. |
id |
FGV-9_e3bb6e235c1b60c33ca12f31b2a21751 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1679-39512021000500901 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSALStakeholder theoryJustification theoryManagement practicesPublic controversiesAbstract We discuss an interplay between two theories by addressing the question: In what ways can the Justification theory (JT) complement the Stakeholder theory (ST)? While ST provides an insight on the importance of creating value for stakeholders without resorting to tradeoffs, it does not address how several stakeholders employ justifications to achieve their goals, nor does it explore the analytical thinking on how organizations and their stakeholders account for and negotiate behaviors during disputes. The JT provides a framework that interprets social interactions and tensions by considering that actors’ decisions and actions are contextualized within organizational reality. Several studies that apply the JT framework in the context of organizations do so by directly or indirectly analyzing stakeholders. Hence, this essay sheds light on how such an intersection may help to comprehend the phenomena related to disputes. The study offers tools and contributes to understanding managerial practices for stakeholders identification and engagement since, to the best of our knowledge, there is a research gap regarding the intersection between JT and ST.Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512021000500901Cadernos EBAPE.BR v.19 n.4 2021reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGV10.1590/1679-395120200179info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGÓES,HELNA ALMEIDA DE ARAUJOREIS,GERMANO GLUFKEABIB,GUSTAVOeng2022-01-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-39512021000500901Revistahttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/cadernosebape/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2022-01-21T00:00Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL |
title |
WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL |
spellingShingle |
WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL GÓES,HELNA ALMEIDA DE ARAUJO Stakeholder theory Justification theory Management practices Public controversies |
title_short |
WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL |
title_full |
WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL |
title_fullStr |
WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL |
title_full_unstemmed |
WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL |
title_sort |
WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL |
author |
GÓES,HELNA ALMEIDA DE ARAUJO |
author_facet |
GÓES,HELNA ALMEIDA DE ARAUJO REIS,GERMANO GLUFKE ABIB,GUSTAVO |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
REIS,GERMANO GLUFKE ABIB,GUSTAVO |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
GÓES,HELNA ALMEIDA DE ARAUJO REIS,GERMANO GLUFKE ABIB,GUSTAVO |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Stakeholder theory Justification theory Management practices Public controversies |
topic |
Stakeholder theory Justification theory Management practices Public controversies |
description |
Abstract We discuss an interplay between two theories by addressing the question: In what ways can the Justification theory (JT) complement the Stakeholder theory (ST)? While ST provides an insight on the importance of creating value for stakeholders without resorting to tradeoffs, it does not address how several stakeholders employ justifications to achieve their goals, nor does it explore the analytical thinking on how organizations and their stakeholders account for and negotiate behaviors during disputes. The JT provides a framework that interprets social interactions and tensions by considering that actors’ decisions and actions are contextualized within organizational reality. Several studies that apply the JT framework in the context of organizations do so by directly or indirectly analyzing stakeholders. Hence, this essay sheds light on how such an intersection may help to comprehend the phenomena related to disputes. The study offers tools and contributes to understanding managerial practices for stakeholders identification and engagement since, to the best of our knowledge, there is a research gap regarding the intersection between JT and ST. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512021000500901 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512021000500901 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1679-395120200179 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR v.19 n.4 2021 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1754115887146729472 |