WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: GÓES,HELNA ALMEIDA DE ARAUJO
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: REIS,GERMANO GLUFKE, ABIB,GUSTAVO
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512021000500901
Resumo: Abstract We discuss an interplay between two theories by addressing the question: In what ways can the Justification theory (JT) complement the Stakeholder theory (ST)? While ST provides an insight on the importance of creating value for stakeholders without resorting to tradeoffs, it does not address how several stakeholders employ justifications to achieve their goals, nor does it explore the analytical thinking on how organizations and their stakeholders account for and negotiate behaviors during disputes. The JT provides a framework that interprets social interactions and tensions by considering that actors’ decisions and actions are contextualized within organizational reality. Several studies that apply the JT framework in the context of organizations do so by directly or indirectly analyzing stakeholders. Hence, this essay sheds light on how such an intersection may help to comprehend the phenomena related to disputes. The study offers tools and contributes to understanding managerial practices for stakeholders identification and engagement since, to the best of our knowledge, there is a research gap regarding the intersection between JT and ST.
id FGV-9_e3bb6e235c1b60c33ca12f31b2a21751
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1679-39512021000500901
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSALStakeholder theoryJustification theoryManagement practicesPublic controversiesAbstract We discuss an interplay between two theories by addressing the question: In what ways can the Justification theory (JT) complement the Stakeholder theory (ST)? While ST provides an insight on the importance of creating value for stakeholders without resorting to tradeoffs, it does not address how several stakeholders employ justifications to achieve their goals, nor does it explore the analytical thinking on how organizations and their stakeholders account for and negotiate behaviors during disputes. The JT provides a framework that interprets social interactions and tensions by considering that actors’ decisions and actions are contextualized within organizational reality. Several studies that apply the JT framework in the context of organizations do so by directly or indirectly analyzing stakeholders. Hence, this essay sheds light on how such an intersection may help to comprehend the phenomena related to disputes. The study offers tools and contributes to understanding managerial practices for stakeholders identification and engagement since, to the best of our knowledge, there is a research gap regarding the intersection between JT and ST.Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512021000500901Cadernos EBAPE.BR v.19 n.4 2021reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGV10.1590/1679-395120200179info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGÓES,HELNA ALMEIDA DE ARAUJOREIS,GERMANO GLUFKEABIB,GUSTAVOeng2022-01-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-39512021000500901Revistahttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/cadernosebape/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2022-01-21T00:00Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL
title WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL
spellingShingle WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL
GÓES,HELNA ALMEIDA DE ARAUJO
Stakeholder theory
Justification theory
Management practices
Public controversies
title_short WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL
title_full WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL
title_fullStr WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL
title_full_unstemmed WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL
title_sort WHEN STAKEHOLDER THEORY MEETS JUSTIFICATION THEORY: AN INTERSECTION PROPOSAL
author GÓES,HELNA ALMEIDA DE ARAUJO
author_facet GÓES,HELNA ALMEIDA DE ARAUJO
REIS,GERMANO GLUFKE
ABIB,GUSTAVO
author_role author
author2 REIS,GERMANO GLUFKE
ABIB,GUSTAVO
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv GÓES,HELNA ALMEIDA DE ARAUJO
REIS,GERMANO GLUFKE
ABIB,GUSTAVO
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Stakeholder theory
Justification theory
Management practices
Public controversies
topic Stakeholder theory
Justification theory
Management practices
Public controversies
description Abstract We discuss an interplay between two theories by addressing the question: In what ways can the Justification theory (JT) complement the Stakeholder theory (ST)? While ST provides an insight on the importance of creating value for stakeholders without resorting to tradeoffs, it does not address how several stakeholders employ justifications to achieve their goals, nor does it explore the analytical thinking on how organizations and their stakeholders account for and negotiate behaviors during disputes. The JT provides a framework that interprets social interactions and tensions by considering that actors’ decisions and actions are contextualized within organizational reality. Several studies that apply the JT framework in the context of organizations do so by directly or indirectly analyzing stakeholders. Hence, this essay sheds light on how such an intersection may help to comprehend the phenomena related to disputes. The study offers tools and contributes to understanding managerial practices for stakeholders identification and engagement since, to the best of our knowledge, there is a research gap regarding the intersection between JT and ST.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512021000500901
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512021000500901
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1679-395120200179
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR v.19 n.4 2021
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1754115887146729472