Organizational Silence: introduction and critique

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moura-Paula, Marcos Júnior de
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Silva Ferraz, Deise Luiza da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/14581
Resumo: With the changes that happened from the 1970s, organizations started to demand more participation of their employees in work processes’ decisions. Open and frank communication becomes vital in this scenario. The organizational silence (MORRISON e MILLIKEN, 2000) and the employee silence (PINDER e HARLOS, 2001) are to be studied in more depth to understand the behaviors that lead employees to voice, via speaking up, or to remain silent. Since the 2000s, silence has gained an increasing research interest (BRINSFIELD, EDWARDS e GREENBERG, 2009), and this paper aims to introduce the organizational silence on the research agenda on Organizational Behavior in Brazil. Therefore, we present what the foreign literature points out as motives that lead employees to remain silent, and the consequences of this silence both for them and for the organization. We believe, however, that there are limitations in the reflections developed. To prevent a domesticated introduction of knowledge, we present some still emerging reflections on the subject based on debates by some Brazilian scholars (especially, TRAGTENBERG, 1971; 2005; PRESTES MOTTA, 1981; PAES DE PAULA, 2002; FARIA e MENEGHETTI, 2011) on the ideological character and, therefore, oppressive side of the knowledge produced by management science. So, we criticize some of the underlying assumptions of the organizational silence theory, drawing attention to the role of the organization itself as sponsor of both silence and the consequences that may arise from it.
id FGV-9_f3b4971d76825066a7c777436fc1b4d9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/14581
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling Organizational Silence: introduction and critiqueSilêncio organizacional: introdução e críticaWith the changes that happened from the 1970s, organizations started to demand more participation of their employees in work processes’ decisions. Open and frank communication becomes vital in this scenario. The organizational silence (MORRISON e MILLIKEN, 2000) and the employee silence (PINDER e HARLOS, 2001) are to be studied in more depth to understand the behaviors that lead employees to voice, via speaking up, or to remain silent. Since the 2000s, silence has gained an increasing research interest (BRINSFIELD, EDWARDS e GREENBERG, 2009), and this paper aims to introduce the organizational silence on the research agenda on Organizational Behavior in Brazil. Therefore, we present what the foreign literature points out as motives that lead employees to remain silent, and the consequences of this silence both for them and for the organization. We believe, however, that there are limitations in the reflections developed. To prevent a domesticated introduction of knowledge, we present some still emerging reflections on the subject based on debates by some Brazilian scholars (especially, TRAGTENBERG, 1971; 2005; PRESTES MOTTA, 1981; PAES DE PAULA, 2002; FARIA e MENEGHETTI, 2011) on the ideological character and, therefore, oppressive side of the knowledge produced by management science. So, we criticize some of the underlying assumptions of the organizational silence theory, drawing attention to the role of the organization itself as sponsor of both silence and the consequences that may arise from it.Com as mudanças ocorridas a partir dos anos 1970, as organizações passaram a requerer maior participação de seus trabalhadores nos processos de trabalho. A comunicação franca e aberta torna-se vital nesse cenário. O silêncio organizacional (MORRISON e MILLIKEN, 2000) e o silêncio dos empregados (PINDER e HARLOS, 2001) passam a ser estudados com mais profundidade para se compreender os comportamentos que levam os empregados a se valerem da voz, via relato (speaking up), ou permanecerem em silêncio. Desde os anos 2000, o silêncio tem ganhado interesse crescente de pesquisa (BRINSFIELD, EDWARDS e GREENBERG, 2009), sendo que, neste ensaio, o objetivo é apresentar e inserir o silêncio organizacional na agenda de pesquisa sobre Comportamento Organizacional no Brasil. Para tanto, apresentamos o que a literatura estrangeira trata como motivos que levam os empregados a permanecerem em silêncio e quais as consequências desse silêncio tanto para eles quanto para a organização. Acreditamos, contudo, que há limitações nas reflexões desenvolvidas. Para não incorrermos em uma importação domesticada de saberes, apresentamos algumas reflexões, ainda incipientes sobre o tema, a partir de debates desenvolvidos por estudiosos brasileiros (especialmente, TRAGTENBERG, 1971; 2005; PRESTES MOTTA, 1981; PAES DE PAULA, 2002; FARIA e MENEGHETTI, 2011) sobre o caráter ideológico e, portanto, opressor dos conhecimentos produzidos nas ciências administrativas. Criticamos, assim, alguns dos pressupostos da teoria sobre o silêncio organizacional, chamando atenção para a própria organização como fomentadora do silêncio e das consequências que dele podem surgir.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2015-06-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/14581Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 3 (2015) - Critical Organizational Studies and Brazilian Thinkers; 516 a 529Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 3 (2015) - Estudios Organizacionales Críticos y Pensadores Nacionales; 516 a 529Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 3 (2015) - Estudos Organizacionais Críticos e Pensadores Nacionais; 516 a 5291679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/14581/50875Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoura-Paula, Marcos Júnior deSilva Ferraz, Deise Luiza da2022-01-30T05:04:59Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/14581Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:49.582406Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Organizational Silence: introduction and critique
Silêncio organizacional: introdução e crítica
title Organizational Silence: introduction and critique
spellingShingle Organizational Silence: introduction and critique
Moura-Paula, Marcos Júnior de
title_short Organizational Silence: introduction and critique
title_full Organizational Silence: introduction and critique
title_fullStr Organizational Silence: introduction and critique
title_full_unstemmed Organizational Silence: introduction and critique
title_sort Organizational Silence: introduction and critique
author Moura-Paula, Marcos Júnior de
author_facet Moura-Paula, Marcos Júnior de
Silva Ferraz, Deise Luiza da
author_role author
author2 Silva Ferraz, Deise Luiza da
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moura-Paula, Marcos Júnior de
Silva Ferraz, Deise Luiza da
description With the changes that happened from the 1970s, organizations started to demand more participation of their employees in work processes’ decisions. Open and frank communication becomes vital in this scenario. The organizational silence (MORRISON e MILLIKEN, 2000) and the employee silence (PINDER e HARLOS, 2001) are to be studied in more depth to understand the behaviors that lead employees to voice, via speaking up, or to remain silent. Since the 2000s, silence has gained an increasing research interest (BRINSFIELD, EDWARDS e GREENBERG, 2009), and this paper aims to introduce the organizational silence on the research agenda on Organizational Behavior in Brazil. Therefore, we present what the foreign literature points out as motives that lead employees to remain silent, and the consequences of this silence both for them and for the organization. We believe, however, that there are limitations in the reflections developed. To prevent a domesticated introduction of knowledge, we present some still emerging reflections on the subject based on debates by some Brazilian scholars (especially, TRAGTENBERG, 1971; 2005; PRESTES MOTTA, 1981; PAES DE PAULA, 2002; FARIA e MENEGHETTI, 2011) on the ideological character and, therefore, oppressive side of the knowledge produced by management science. So, we criticize some of the underlying assumptions of the organizational silence theory, drawing attention to the role of the organization itself as sponsor of both silence and the consequences that may arise from it.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/14581
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/14581
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/14581/50875
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 3 (2015) - Critical Organizational Studies and Brazilian Thinkers; 516 a 529
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 3 (2015) - Estudios Organizacionales Críticos y Pensadores Nacionales; 516 a 529
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 13 n. 3 (2015) - Estudos Organizacionais Críticos e Pensadores Nacionais; 516 a 529
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943209457451008