Pluralism, post-structuralism and “engagement management”: limits for the critical management studies movement
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5389 |
Resumo: | The aim of this article is to question pluralism in Critical Management Studies (CMS) movement, to point out the limits of the post-structuralism as a critical epistemology, to denounce the risks of a critique in line with “engagement management” and to show different ways to arrive at a debate between theory and practice on the critical movement. To do so, we described the most important post-structuralism characteristics, questioning the critical status of this epistemology and also questioning pluralism in CMS. Next, we discuss how some of CMS’ representatives defend “engagement management” through a critical perfomativity which uses inadequately formulations of post-structuralism. We also discuss other practical approaches for a critique in organization studies, using the concept of praxis and critical education as ways to enlighten consciences and reestablish a critical activism. We conclude that post-structuralism should be taken more seriously, what may indicate that is necessary to build a new theoretical movement to use its contributions, preserving its critical character. |
id |
FGV-9_fc139eac1c2bf428889fe8ab6d4ca5fc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/5389 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pluralism, post-structuralism and “engagement management”: limits for the critical management studies movementPluralismo, pós-estruturalismo e "gerencialismo engajado": os limites do movimento critical management studiesThe aim of this article is to question pluralism in Critical Management Studies (CMS) movement, to point out the limits of the post-structuralism as a critical epistemology, to denounce the risks of a critique in line with “engagement management” and to show different ways to arrive at a debate between theory and practice on the critical movement. To do so, we described the most important post-structuralism characteristics, questioning the critical status of this epistemology and also questioning pluralism in CMS. Next, we discuss how some of CMS’ representatives defend “engagement management” through a critical perfomativity which uses inadequately formulations of post-structuralism. We also discuss other practical approaches for a critique in organization studies, using the concept of praxis and critical education as ways to enlighten consciences and reestablish a critical activism. We conclude that post-structuralism should be taken more seriously, what may indicate that is necessary to build a new theoretical movement to use its contributions, preserving its critical character.O objetivo deste artigo é questionar o pluralismo do movimento critical management studies (CMS), apontar os limites do pós-estruturalismo como epistemologia crítica, denunciar os riscos de uma crítica alinhada com o “gerencialismo engajado” e apontar caminhos para o debate sobre a teoria e a prática no movimento crítico. Para isso, definimos as principais características do pós-estruturalismo, questionando seu caráter crítico, e problematizamos a questão do pluralismo no movimento CMS. Em seguida, analisamos como alguns dos representantes deste movimento defendem o “gerencialismo engajado” através de uma performatividade crítica, fazendo um uso inadequado de algumas formulações pós-estruturalistas. Discutimos então os caminhos para a prática na crítica, resgatando o conceito de práxis e afirmando a importância da educação como forma de despertar consciências e reconstituir o ativismo social e político. Concluímos destacando que o pós-estruturalismo deveria ser resgatado com maior seriedade, de modo a se constituir um novo movimento teórico para abrigar suas contribuições, preservando o caráter crítico.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5389Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2009); 392 a 404Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 7 Núm. 3 (2009); 392 a 404Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 7 n. 3 (2009); 392 a 4041679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5389/4123Paula, Ana Paula Paes deMaranhão, Carolina Machado Saraiva de AlbuquerqueBarros, Amon Narciso deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-10-10T17:20:16Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/5389Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:38.182392Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pluralism, post-structuralism and “engagement management”: limits for the critical management studies movement Pluralismo, pós-estruturalismo e "gerencialismo engajado": os limites do movimento critical management studies |
title |
Pluralism, post-structuralism and “engagement management”: limits for the critical management studies movement |
spellingShingle |
Pluralism, post-structuralism and “engagement management”: limits for the critical management studies movement Paula, Ana Paula Paes de |
title_short |
Pluralism, post-structuralism and “engagement management”: limits for the critical management studies movement |
title_full |
Pluralism, post-structuralism and “engagement management”: limits for the critical management studies movement |
title_fullStr |
Pluralism, post-structuralism and “engagement management”: limits for the critical management studies movement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pluralism, post-structuralism and “engagement management”: limits for the critical management studies movement |
title_sort |
Pluralism, post-structuralism and “engagement management”: limits for the critical management studies movement |
author |
Paula, Ana Paula Paes de |
author_facet |
Paula, Ana Paula Paes de Maranhão, Carolina Machado Saraiva de Albuquerque Barros, Amon Narciso de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Maranhão, Carolina Machado Saraiva de Albuquerque Barros, Amon Narciso de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paula, Ana Paula Paes de Maranhão, Carolina Machado Saraiva de Albuquerque Barros, Amon Narciso de |
description |
The aim of this article is to question pluralism in Critical Management Studies (CMS) movement, to point out the limits of the post-structuralism as a critical epistemology, to denounce the risks of a critique in line with “engagement management” and to show different ways to arrive at a debate between theory and practice on the critical movement. To do so, we described the most important post-structuralism characteristics, questioning the critical status of this epistemology and also questioning pluralism in CMS. Next, we discuss how some of CMS’ representatives defend “engagement management” through a critical perfomativity which uses inadequately formulations of post-structuralism. We also discuss other practical approaches for a critique in organization studies, using the concept of praxis and critical education as ways to enlighten consciences and reestablish a critical activism. We conclude that post-structuralism should be taken more seriously, what may indicate that is necessary to build a new theoretical movement to use its contributions, preserving its critical character. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5389 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5389 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/5389/4123 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2009); 392 a 404 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 7 Núm. 3 (2009); 392 a 404 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 7 n. 3 (2009); 392 a 404 1679-3951 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943208482275328 |