O Superior Tribunal Militar durante a ditadura militar brasileira (1974-1985)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10438/25763 |
Resumo: | This research aims to understand how the Superior Military Courty (STM) proceeded to try those accused of crimes against national security in the political conjuncture of the process known as the liberalization of military dictatorship during the governments of generals Ernesto Geisel and João Baptista Figueiredo (1974-1985). From this, it is sought to identify how the STM dealt with the progressive reduction of authoritarian laws and the changes in the National Security Law (LSN), in order to understand if there was a process of liberalization and if we can affirm that it took effect in the performance of military justice. The liberalization period was chosen for this study on the decision-making behavior of the STM, since the measures taken by the government - such as the permitting of elections, the new LSN, the repeal of institutional acts, the enactment of the amnesty law, the return of partisan plurality and some freedom for the workings of the workers' movements - did not mean the existence of less severe sentences. On the other side, the trial of defendants for bank robbery, for example, resulted in very high penalties between 1974 and 1979, and also the possibility that trade unionists might be punished by the court during the period known as the new trade union movement in in the late 1970s and early 1980s. In addition, I intend to contribute to studies that seek to understand the role assumed by the STM during this period, since the institution still seeks to justify the period in which it acted in the trial of defendants of crimes politicians ascribing to themselves the role of a justice linked to a state governed by the rule of law and therefore a guarantee of citizens' rights, even at that time, when they lived under an authoritarian regime. |
id |
FGV_9c757b28dc6f6bf91fe9dbf4ba5fb34b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/25763 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
repository_id_str |
3974 |
spelling |
Coitinho, Angélica do CarmoEscolas::CPDOCSouza, Adriana Barreto deAlmeida, Gelsom Rozentino deMattos, Marco Aurélio Vannucchi Leme deD'Araujo, Maria CelinaMaia, João Marcelo EhlertQuadrat, Samantha VizSilva, Angela Moreira Domingues da2018-12-10T12:45:05Z2018-12-10T12:45:05Z2018-10-11http://hdl.handle.net/10438/25763This research aims to understand how the Superior Military Courty (STM) proceeded to try those accused of crimes against national security in the political conjuncture of the process known as the liberalization of military dictatorship during the governments of generals Ernesto Geisel and João Baptista Figueiredo (1974-1985). From this, it is sought to identify how the STM dealt with the progressive reduction of authoritarian laws and the changes in the National Security Law (LSN), in order to understand if there was a process of liberalization and if we can affirm that it took effect in the performance of military justice. The liberalization period was chosen for this study on the decision-making behavior of the STM, since the measures taken by the government - such as the permitting of elections, the new LSN, the repeal of institutional acts, the enactment of the amnesty law, the return of partisan plurality and some freedom for the workings of the workers' movements - did not mean the existence of less severe sentences. On the other side, the trial of defendants for bank robbery, for example, resulted in very high penalties between 1974 and 1979, and also the possibility that trade unionists might be punished by the court during the period known as the new trade union movement in in the late 1970s and early 1980s. In addition, I intend to contribute to studies that seek to understand the role assumed by the STM during this period, since the institution still seeks to justify the period in which it acted in the trial of defendants of crimes politicians ascribing to themselves the role of a justice linked to a state governed by the rule of law and therefore a guarantee of citizens' rights, even at that time, when they lived under an authoritarian regime.Esta pesquisa tem como objetivo compreender de que maneira o Superior Tribunal Militar (STM) procedeu ao julgar acusados de crimes contra a segurança nacional na conjuntura política do processo que se convencionou chamar de liberalização da ditadura militar, durante os governos dos generais Ernesto Geisel e João Baptista Figueiredo (1974-1985). A partir disso, busca-se identificar como o STM lidou com a progressiva diminuição das leis autoritárias e as mudanças na Lei de Segurança Nacional (LSN), com a finalidade de compreender se havia um processo de liberalização e se podemos afirmar que ele se efetivou na atuação da justiça castrense. O período de liberalização foi escolhido para este estudo sobre o comportamento decisório do STM, uma vez que as medidas empreendidas pelo governo – como a permissão de eleições, a nova LSN, a revogação dos atos institucionais, a edição da lei de anistia, a volta da pluralidade partidária e alguma liberdade para a atuação dos movimentos de trabalhadores - não significaram a existência de sentenças menos severas. Pelo contrário, o julgamento de acusados pelos crimes de assalto a banco, por exemplo, resultaram em penas altíssimas, entre 1974 a 1979, e também a possibilidade de que os sindicalistas fossem punidos pelo tribunal, no período do movimento conhecido como novo sindicalismo, em fins da década de 1970 e início da década de 1980. Além disso, pretendo contribuir com os estudos que buscam compreender o papel assumido pelo STM durante esse período, já que a instituição ainda procura justificar o período em que atuou no julgamento de acusados de crimes políticos atribuindo a si o papel de uma justiça ligada a um Estado de Direito e, portanto, garantidora dos direitos dos cidadãos, mesmo naquele momento, quando se vivia sob um regime autoritário.porMilitary Dictatorship (1964-1985)Superior Military CourtPolitical crimesDitadura Militar (1964-1985)Superior Tribunal MilitarCrimes políticosHistóriaDitadura - Brasil, 1974-1985Brasil. Supremo Tribunal de JustiçaCrime políticoGoverno militarO Superior Tribunal Militar durante a ditadura militar brasileira (1974-1985)info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisreponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTEXTTese_Angelica_Versão Biblioteca.pdf.txtTese_Angelica_Versão Biblioteca.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain103127https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/54232fc4-5c51-477b-8eb6-b4b8d6eaa72c/download93db259f2800612ca68ba997c5ecd61fMD55ORIGINALTese_Angelica_Versão Biblioteca.pdfTese_Angelica_Versão Biblioteca.pdfapplication/pdf1917849https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/cc7bab1e-f3c5-491c-8a54-9383fca734b1/download6f2d1b063a7bf420ad915badc8a64e2bMD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84707https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/0d744cc4-8a7b-40d5-a4f9-11cc3fc425cb/downloaddfb340242cced38a6cca06c627998fa1MD52THUMBNAILTese_Angelica_Versão Biblioteca.pdf.jpgTese_Angelica_Versão Biblioteca.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3193https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/6c4d9bd2-7351-4188-94eb-98e95b627450/download64622d7f127d76681d9092ffcf208d37MD5610438/257632023-11-28 00:06:47.097open.accessoai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/25763https://repositorio.fgv.brRepositório InstitucionalPRIhttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace-oai/requestopendoar:39742023-11-28T00:06:47Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)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 |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
O Superior Tribunal Militar durante a ditadura militar brasileira (1974-1985) |
title |
O Superior Tribunal Militar durante a ditadura militar brasileira (1974-1985) |
spellingShingle |
O Superior Tribunal Militar durante a ditadura militar brasileira (1974-1985) Coitinho, Angélica do Carmo Military Dictatorship (1964-1985) Superior Military Court Political crimes Ditadura Militar (1964-1985) Superior Tribunal Militar Crimes políticos História Ditadura - Brasil, 1974-1985 Brasil. Supremo Tribunal de Justiça Crime político Governo militar |
title_short |
O Superior Tribunal Militar durante a ditadura militar brasileira (1974-1985) |
title_full |
O Superior Tribunal Militar durante a ditadura militar brasileira (1974-1985) |
title_fullStr |
O Superior Tribunal Militar durante a ditadura militar brasileira (1974-1985) |
title_full_unstemmed |
O Superior Tribunal Militar durante a ditadura militar brasileira (1974-1985) |
title_sort |
O Superior Tribunal Militar durante a ditadura militar brasileira (1974-1985) |
author |
Coitinho, Angélica do Carmo |
author_facet |
Coitinho, Angélica do Carmo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.unidadefgv.por.fl_str_mv |
Escolas::CPDOC |
dc.contributor.member.none.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Adriana Barreto de Almeida, Gelsom Rozentino de Mattos, Marco Aurélio Vannucchi Leme de D'Araujo, Maria Celina Maia, João Marcelo Ehlert Quadrat, Samantha Viz |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Coitinho, Angélica do Carmo |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Angela Moreira Domingues da |
contributor_str_mv |
Silva, Angela Moreira Domingues da |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Military Dictatorship (1964-1985) Superior Military Court Political crimes |
topic |
Military Dictatorship (1964-1985) Superior Military Court Political crimes Ditadura Militar (1964-1985) Superior Tribunal Militar Crimes políticos História Ditadura - Brasil, 1974-1985 Brasil. Supremo Tribunal de Justiça Crime político Governo militar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ditadura Militar (1964-1985) Superior Tribunal Militar Crimes políticos |
dc.subject.area.por.fl_str_mv |
História |
dc.subject.bibliodata.por.fl_str_mv |
Ditadura - Brasil, 1974-1985 Brasil. Supremo Tribunal de Justiça Crime político Governo militar |
description |
This research aims to understand how the Superior Military Courty (STM) proceeded to try those accused of crimes against national security in the political conjuncture of the process known as the liberalization of military dictatorship during the governments of generals Ernesto Geisel and João Baptista Figueiredo (1974-1985). From this, it is sought to identify how the STM dealt with the progressive reduction of authoritarian laws and the changes in the National Security Law (LSN), in order to understand if there was a process of liberalization and if we can affirm that it took effect in the performance of military justice. The liberalization period was chosen for this study on the decision-making behavior of the STM, since the measures taken by the government - such as the permitting of elections, the new LSN, the repeal of institutional acts, the enactment of the amnesty law, the return of partisan plurality and some freedom for the workings of the workers' movements - did not mean the existence of less severe sentences. On the other side, the trial of defendants for bank robbery, for example, resulted in very high penalties between 1974 and 1979, and also the possibility that trade unionists might be punished by the court during the period known as the new trade union movement in in the late 1970s and early 1980s. In addition, I intend to contribute to studies that seek to understand the role assumed by the STM during this period, since the institution still seeks to justify the period in which it acted in the trial of defendants of crimes politicians ascribing to themselves the role of a justice linked to a state governed by the rule of law and therefore a guarantee of citizens' rights, even at that time, when they lived under an authoritarian regime. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-10T12:45:05Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-10T12:45:05Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-11 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/25763 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/25763 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/54232fc4-5c51-477b-8eb6-b4b8d6eaa72c/download https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/cc7bab1e-f3c5-491c-8a54-9383fca734b1/download https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/0d744cc4-8a7b-40d5-a4f9-11cc3fc425cb/download https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/6c4d9bd2-7351-4188-94eb-98e95b627450/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
93db259f2800612ca68ba997c5ecd61f 6f2d1b063a7bf420ad915badc8a64e2b dfb340242cced38a6cca06c627998fa1 64622d7f127d76681d9092ffcf208d37 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1810023954103926784 |