Financiamento para o subdesenvolvimento, o Brasil e o segundo consenso de Washington

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos
Data de Publicação: 2002
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10438/1894
Resumo: While in the social and in the ethical realms the Cardoso administration was successful, its economic outcomes were frustrating. In this administration’s eight years the investment rate did not increase and income per capita growth lagged, while the public debt and the foreign debt increased substantially. This poor economic performance may be explained by three chained causes: a mistake in agenda setting, the adoption of the Second Washington Consensus, and the alienation of elites. The decision of setting high inflation as the major problem to be tackled instead of achieving equilibrium in foreign accounts represented a major macroeconomic mistake, which can be explained by the Second Washington Consensus. This consensus proposed in the 1990s that highly indebted countries should grow counting on foreign savings, although this is not the experience among OECD countries. The outcome was to evaluate the real, to increase artificially wages and consumption, so that instead of growth what we have been increased indebtedness. Why this flopped strategy was adopted? Rich countries’ interests are not difficult to guess. On the part of Brazil, the only explanation is Brazilian elites’ alienation in relation to the country’s national interest. As a final outcome, the Cardoso administration ends with another balance of payments crisis, which was empowered by the coming presidential elections. Yet, the solvency situation of the Brazilian economy have been improving since the 1999 successful floatation of the real, so that I believe that, adopted a policy that deepens fiscal adjustment, while lowers the interest rate, and avoids new evaluation of the real, the country will eventually be able to avoid default.
id FGV_a9f61fec9b3445ee37cbb5eca11b3067
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/1894
network_acronym_str FGV
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
repository_id_str 3974
spelling Bresser-Pereira, Luiz CarlosEscolas::EESP2008-10-16T19:09:53Z2008-10-16T19:09:53Z2002-12-012002-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://hdl.handle.net/10438/1894While in the social and in the ethical realms the Cardoso administration was successful, its economic outcomes were frustrating. In this administration’s eight years the investment rate did not increase and income per capita growth lagged, while the public debt and the foreign debt increased substantially. This poor economic performance may be explained by three chained causes: a mistake in agenda setting, the adoption of the Second Washington Consensus, and the alienation of elites. The decision of setting high inflation as the major problem to be tackled instead of achieving equilibrium in foreign accounts represented a major macroeconomic mistake, which can be explained by the Second Washington Consensus. This consensus proposed in the 1990s that highly indebted countries should grow counting on foreign savings, although this is not the experience among OECD countries. The outcome was to evaluate the real, to increase artificially wages and consumption, so that instead of growth what we have been increased indebtedness. Why this flopped strategy was adopted? Rich countries’ interests are not difficult to guess. On the part of Brazil, the only explanation is Brazilian elites’ alienation in relation to the country’s national interest. As a final outcome, the Cardoso administration ends with another balance of payments crisis, which was empowered by the coming presidential elections. Yet, the solvency situation of the Brazilian economy have been improving since the 1999 successful floatation of the real, so that I believe that, adopted a policy that deepens fiscal adjustment, while lowers the interest rate, and avoids new evaluation of the real, the country will eventually be able to avoid default.porTextos para Discussão;119N1EconomiaDesenvolvimento econômicoInvestimentos estrangeiros - BrasilFinanciamento para o subdesenvolvimento, o Brasil e o segundo consenso de Washingtoninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessORIGINALTD119.pdfapplication/pdf306424https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/3fd70ea8-4efa-4a38-941a-331729db9c0e/download80d0e0d2b3b7e84568d4b52e08e008ceMD51TEXTTD119.pdf.txtTD119.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain103172https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/d02a7bc0-59c0-45e9-8fdf-4635871ec73c/download2943cff6f07a48808eef090231c14d4fMD56THUMBNAILTD119.pdf.jpgTD119.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4610https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/8e4457be-2ad2-4016-ba58-e5a50d9bca11/download9156971c9d6f7d72ae92bcaef4646111MD5710438/18942023-11-08 04:20:07.288open.accessoai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/1894https://repositorio.fgv.brRepositório InstitucionalPRIhttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace-oai/requestopendoar:39742023-11-08T04:20:07Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Financiamento para o subdesenvolvimento, o Brasil e o segundo consenso de Washington
title Financiamento para o subdesenvolvimento, o Brasil e o segundo consenso de Washington
spellingShingle Financiamento para o subdesenvolvimento, o Brasil e o segundo consenso de Washington
Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos
N1
Economia
Desenvolvimento econômico
Investimentos estrangeiros - Brasil
title_short Financiamento para o subdesenvolvimento, o Brasil e o segundo consenso de Washington
title_full Financiamento para o subdesenvolvimento, o Brasil e o segundo consenso de Washington
title_fullStr Financiamento para o subdesenvolvimento, o Brasil e o segundo consenso de Washington
title_full_unstemmed Financiamento para o subdesenvolvimento, o Brasil e o segundo consenso de Washington
title_sort Financiamento para o subdesenvolvimento, o Brasil e o segundo consenso de Washington
author Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos
author_facet Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos
author_role author
dc.contributor.unidadefgv.por.fl_str_mv Escolas::EESP
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos
dc.subject.classification.por.fl_str_mv N1
topic N1
Economia
Desenvolvimento econômico
Investimentos estrangeiros - Brasil
dc.subject.area.por.fl_str_mv Economia
dc.subject.bibliodata.por.fl_str_mv Desenvolvimento econômico
Investimentos estrangeiros - Brasil
description While in the social and in the ethical realms the Cardoso administration was successful, its economic outcomes were frustrating. In this administration’s eight years the investment rate did not increase and income per capita growth lagged, while the public debt and the foreign debt increased substantially. This poor economic performance may be explained by three chained causes: a mistake in agenda setting, the adoption of the Second Washington Consensus, and the alienation of elites. The decision of setting high inflation as the major problem to be tackled instead of achieving equilibrium in foreign accounts represented a major macroeconomic mistake, which can be explained by the Second Washington Consensus. This consensus proposed in the 1990s that highly indebted countries should grow counting on foreign savings, although this is not the experience among OECD countries. The outcome was to evaluate the real, to increase artificially wages and consumption, so that instead of growth what we have been increased indebtedness. Why this flopped strategy was adopted? Rich countries’ interests are not difficult to guess. On the part of Brazil, the only explanation is Brazilian elites’ alienation in relation to the country’s national interest. As a final outcome, the Cardoso administration ends with another balance of payments crisis, which was empowered by the coming presidential elections. Yet, the solvency situation of the Brazilian economy have been improving since the 1999 successful floatation of the real, so that I believe that, adopted a policy that deepens fiscal adjustment, while lowers the interest rate, and avoids new evaluation of the real, the country will eventually be able to avoid default.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.submitted.none.fl_str_mv 2002-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2002-12-01
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2008-10-16T19:09:53Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2008-10-16T19:09:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10438/1894
url http://hdl.handle.net/10438/1894
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.ispartofseries.por.fl_str_mv Textos para Discussão;119
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
collection Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/3fd70ea8-4efa-4a38-941a-331729db9c0e/download
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/d02a7bc0-59c0-45e9-8fdf-4635871ec73c/download
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/8e4457be-2ad2-4016-ba58-e5a50d9bca11/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 80d0e0d2b3b7e84568d4b52e08e008ce
2943cff6f07a48808eef090231c14d4f
9156971c9d6f7d72ae92bcaef4646111
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1810023831979425792