Inovação e hospitais universitários: um estudo de caso

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Antonio José Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10438/32962
Resumo: Introduction: Innovation in services includes implementation of advances or technological processes in care or teaching services, aiming at adjustments and improvements. Objective: To analyze how the adoption of health innovation results in changes in management and care production at the University Hospital (“UH”). Methods: Review of the scientific literature on topics of university hospitals management - UHs, interactions with Health Systems, and on the impact of innovation in its three mandatory axes (healthcare, research and teaching). Two methodological approaches were used: (i) literature review on innovation and on a specific example, robotic surgery; and (ii) analysis of the case study of this adoption in this university hospital. Results: The reviewed scientific literature presents the accelerated evolution of incremental and disruptive innovations in the last decades. High-cost structural innovations and healthtechs are reinventing and improving hospital processes and services. Although the Unified Health System, SUS, legislated increased responsibilities for the UHs, its funding was not adequately adjusted. This dynamic and pressure to incorporate innovations challenges UHs to ensure sustainability in delivering teaching, research, and healthcare results. Some management results of this adoption of the Robotic Surgery Program were evaluated through the post facto analysis of the data from the original controlled study, compared to conventional, open, or laparoscopic surgeries, in subprojects. The use of healthcare resources was significantly higher for robotic surgeries in half of the subprojects. The highest proportion of costs occurs in the intraoperative period. The value of dedicated disposables used with the robot (manufacturer's monopoly) is high, resulting in a higher cost trend than conventional (control) surgeries. However, there were gains in institutional prestige, installed physical capacity and specialized know-how, which have innovated in the teaching program and expanded research opportunities. However, responsibilities in hospital management were increased and the initial planning of the study was partial, without predicting the subsequent regular program in the SUS. Pressure, negotiations, and hospital debts to continue the unfunded care program have expanded. This highlighted the importance of the vision of the future that hospital managers should possess. Conclusion: Innovations may lead to evolution and renewal but increase institutional costs and expenses for the Health System. In this case study, there are still controversies about the clinical relevance of the additional benefits, which this study has not yet conclusively resolved. There were institutional gains in the missions of researching and teaching the state of the art. There is greater surgical capacity installed. More beds available provide greater healthcare resolution. Human resources are more comfortable and experienced. However, for patients, this has not yet influenced overall survival or cancer progression-free survival. In addition, the healthcare program costs raised since robotic surgery adoption. In 2021, the Health Ministry again ruled out the prospect of funding. The case of adopting innovation, as in this example, challenges hospital managers to innovate in methods to manage real-life data and anticipate the political-economic context determinants of the health sector. Documenting and disseminating knowledge and experiences can allow advances in Hospital Administration.
id FGV_db915105f3447bc7a364ed23576cc5bf
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/32962
network_acronym_str FGV
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
repository_id_str 3974
spelling Pereira, Antonio José RodriguesEscolas::EAESPTonelli, Maria JoséPedroso, Marcelo CaldeiraNahas, William CarlosMalik, Ana Maria2022-12-05T13:23:28Z2022-12-05T13:23:28Z2022-11-08https://hdl.handle.net/10438/32962Introduction: Innovation in services includes implementation of advances or technological processes in care or teaching services, aiming at adjustments and improvements. Objective: To analyze how the adoption of health innovation results in changes in management and care production at the University Hospital (“UH”). Methods: Review of the scientific literature on topics of university hospitals management - UHs, interactions with Health Systems, and on the impact of innovation in its three mandatory axes (healthcare, research and teaching). Two methodological approaches were used: (i) literature review on innovation and on a specific example, robotic surgery; and (ii) analysis of the case study of this adoption in this university hospital. Results: The reviewed scientific literature presents the accelerated evolution of incremental and disruptive innovations in the last decades. High-cost structural innovations and healthtechs are reinventing and improving hospital processes and services. Although the Unified Health System, SUS, legislated increased responsibilities for the UHs, its funding was not adequately adjusted. This dynamic and pressure to incorporate innovations challenges UHs to ensure sustainability in delivering teaching, research, and healthcare results. Some management results of this adoption of the Robotic Surgery Program were evaluated through the post facto analysis of the data from the original controlled study, compared to conventional, open, or laparoscopic surgeries, in subprojects. The use of healthcare resources was significantly higher for robotic surgeries in half of the subprojects. The highest proportion of costs occurs in the intraoperative period. The value of dedicated disposables used with the robot (manufacturer's monopoly) is high, resulting in a higher cost trend than conventional (control) surgeries. However, there were gains in institutional prestige, installed physical capacity and specialized know-how, which have innovated in the teaching program and expanded research opportunities. However, responsibilities in hospital management were increased and the initial planning of the study was partial, without predicting the subsequent regular program in the SUS. Pressure, negotiations, and hospital debts to continue the unfunded care program have expanded. This highlighted the importance of the vision of the future that hospital managers should possess. Conclusion: Innovations may lead to evolution and renewal but increase institutional costs and expenses for the Health System. In this case study, there are still controversies about the clinical relevance of the additional benefits, which this study has not yet conclusively resolved. There were institutional gains in the missions of researching and teaching the state of the art. There is greater surgical capacity installed. More beds available provide greater healthcare resolution. Human resources are more comfortable and experienced. However, for patients, this has not yet influenced overall survival or cancer progression-free survival. In addition, the healthcare program costs raised since robotic surgery adoption. In 2021, the Health Ministry again ruled out the prospect of funding. The case of adopting innovation, as in this example, challenges hospital managers to innovate in methods to manage real-life data and anticipate the political-economic context determinants of the health sector. Documenting and disseminating knowledge and experiences can allow advances in Hospital Administration.Introdução: A inovação nos serviços inclui implementação de avanços ou processos tecnológicos em serviços assistenciais ou de ensino, visando ajustes e melhorias. Objetivo: Analisar de que forma a adoção de inovação da Saúde resulta em mudanças na gestão e na produção assistencial no Hospital Universitário. Métodos: Revisão da literatura científica sobre temas da gestão de hospitais universitários – HUs, interações com os Sistemas de Saúde e o impacto da inovação nos três eixos mandatórios (assistência, pesquisa e ensino). Foram utilizadas duas abordagens metodológicas: (i) revisão da literatura sobre inovação, trazendo um exemplo específico, a cirurgia robótica; (ii) análise do estudo deste caso neste hospital universitário. Resultados: A literatura científica revisada apresenta a evolução acelerada de inovações incrementais e disruptivas nas últimas décadas. Inovações estruturantes de alto custo e healthtechs estão reinventando e aprimorando processos e serviços hospitalares. Embora o Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS, tenha legislado aumento das responsabilidades dos HUs, seu financiamento não foi adequadamente ajustado. Esta dinâmica e pressões para incorporar inovações desafia os HUs para garantir sustentabilidade na entrega dos resultados de ensino, pesquisa e assistência. Alguns resultados gerenciais desta adoção do Programa de Cirurgia Robótica foram avaliados por meio da análise post facto dos dados do estudo controlado original, comparativo às cirurgias convencionais, abertas ou laparoscópicas, em subprojetos. O uso de recursos assistenciais foi significativamente mais elevado para as cirurgias robóticas na metade dos subprojetos. A maior proporção dos custos ocorre no período intraoperatório. O valor dos materiais descartáveis dedicados utilizados com o robô (monopólio do fabricante) é elevado, resultando na tendência de maior custo se comparando às cirurgias convencionais (de controle). Entretanto, houve ganhos de prestígio institucional, capacidade física instalada e know-how especializado, que inovaram no programa de ensino e ampliaram as oportunidades de pesquisas. Porém, aumentaram-se as responsabilidades em gestão hospitalar e o planejamento inicial do estudo foi parcial, sem prever o programa regular posterior no SUS. Pressão, negociações e dívidas hospitalares para continuar o programa assistencial sem financiamento, ampliaram-se. Isto destacou a importância da visão de futuro que os gestores hospitalares devem possuir. Conclusão: Inovações podem ensejar evolução e renovação, mas aumentar custos institucionais e gastos para o Sistema de Saúde. Neste caso estudado, persistem controvérsias sobre a relevância clínica dos benefícios adicionais, que este estudo ainda não dirimiu de forma conclusiva. Houve ganhos institucionais nas missões de pesquisar e de ensinar o estado da arte. Há maior capacidade cirúrgica instalada. Mais leitos disponíveis propiciam maior resolutividade assistencial. Os recursos humanos estão mais confortáveis e experientes. Contudo, para os pacientes, isto ainda não influenciou a sobrevida global ou livre de progressão do câncer. Além disto, elevaram-se os custos para o programa assistencial pela cirurgia robótica. Em 2021, o Ministério da Saúde voltou a afastar a perspectiva de seu financiamento. O caso de adoção de inovação, como neste exemplo, desafia gestores hospitalares a inovar em métodos para gerenciar dados da vida real e antecipar determinantes do contexto político-econômico do setor de Saúde. Documentar e disseminar conhecimentos e experiências pode permitir avanços na Administração Hospitalar.porInnovationUniversity hospitalsRobotic surgeryInovaçãoHospital universitárioCirurgia robóticaAdministração de empresasHospitais universitários - AdministraçãoCirurgia - Inovações tecnológicasRobótica na medicinaInovações médicasInovação e hospitais universitários: um estudo de casoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84707https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/29f3e7f9-39a6-419b-83f6-cf00694f0d15/downloaddfb340242cced38a6cca06c627998fa1MD52ORIGINALTese Dr. Antonio_Versao Final.pdfTese Dr. Antonio_Versao Final.pdfPDFapplication/pdf5899414https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/62171afe-537d-4929-86dd-3b9761db5a38/download5490f610af0995ea10ca2a93d939653dMD51TEXTTese Dr. Antonio_Versao Final.pdf.txtTese Dr. Antonio_Versao Final.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain103022https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/b222a783-6524-4b78-8d51-15bcc9d5b88a/download24af077962f80646ccf7fcff0dafe6b5MD55THUMBNAILTese Dr. Antonio_Versao Final.pdf.jpgTese Dr. Antonio_Versao Final.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2782https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/66b18ec4-83f7-482a-bc55-4e2ea299aaa6/download3c3d8a6be0823b2b8d2975b5ace047a4MD5610438/329622023-11-26 03:19:02.016open.accessoai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/32962https://repositorio.fgv.brRepositório InstitucionalPRIhttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace-oai/requestopendoar:39742023-11-26T03:19:02Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)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
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Inovação e hospitais universitários: um estudo de caso
title Inovação e hospitais universitários: um estudo de caso
spellingShingle Inovação e hospitais universitários: um estudo de caso
Pereira, Antonio José Rodrigues
Innovation
University hospitals
Robotic surgery
Inovação
Hospital universitário
Cirurgia robótica
Administração de empresas
Hospitais universitários - Administração
Cirurgia - Inovações tecnológicas
Robótica na medicina
Inovações médicas
title_short Inovação e hospitais universitários: um estudo de caso
title_full Inovação e hospitais universitários: um estudo de caso
title_fullStr Inovação e hospitais universitários: um estudo de caso
title_full_unstemmed Inovação e hospitais universitários: um estudo de caso
title_sort Inovação e hospitais universitários: um estudo de caso
author Pereira, Antonio José Rodrigues
author_facet Pereira, Antonio José Rodrigues
author_role author
dc.contributor.unidadefgv.por.fl_str_mv Escolas::EAESP
dc.contributor.member.none.fl_str_mv Tonelli, Maria José
Pedroso, Marcelo Caldeira
Nahas, William Carlos
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Antonio José Rodrigues
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Malik, Ana Maria
contributor_str_mv Malik, Ana Maria
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Innovation
University hospitals
Robotic surgery
topic Innovation
University hospitals
Robotic surgery
Inovação
Hospital universitário
Cirurgia robótica
Administração de empresas
Hospitais universitários - Administração
Cirurgia - Inovações tecnológicas
Robótica na medicina
Inovações médicas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Inovação
Hospital universitário
Cirurgia robótica
dc.subject.area.por.fl_str_mv Administração de empresas
dc.subject.bibliodata.por.fl_str_mv Hospitais universitários - Administração
Cirurgia - Inovações tecnológicas
Robótica na medicina
Inovações médicas
description Introduction: Innovation in services includes implementation of advances or technological processes in care or teaching services, aiming at adjustments and improvements. Objective: To analyze how the adoption of health innovation results in changes in management and care production at the University Hospital (“UH”). Methods: Review of the scientific literature on topics of university hospitals management - UHs, interactions with Health Systems, and on the impact of innovation in its three mandatory axes (healthcare, research and teaching). Two methodological approaches were used: (i) literature review on innovation and on a specific example, robotic surgery; and (ii) analysis of the case study of this adoption in this university hospital. Results: The reviewed scientific literature presents the accelerated evolution of incremental and disruptive innovations in the last decades. High-cost structural innovations and healthtechs are reinventing and improving hospital processes and services. Although the Unified Health System, SUS, legislated increased responsibilities for the UHs, its funding was not adequately adjusted. This dynamic and pressure to incorporate innovations challenges UHs to ensure sustainability in delivering teaching, research, and healthcare results. Some management results of this adoption of the Robotic Surgery Program were evaluated through the post facto analysis of the data from the original controlled study, compared to conventional, open, or laparoscopic surgeries, in subprojects. The use of healthcare resources was significantly higher for robotic surgeries in half of the subprojects. The highest proportion of costs occurs in the intraoperative period. The value of dedicated disposables used with the robot (manufacturer's monopoly) is high, resulting in a higher cost trend than conventional (control) surgeries. However, there were gains in institutional prestige, installed physical capacity and specialized know-how, which have innovated in the teaching program and expanded research opportunities. However, responsibilities in hospital management were increased and the initial planning of the study was partial, without predicting the subsequent regular program in the SUS. Pressure, negotiations, and hospital debts to continue the unfunded care program have expanded. This highlighted the importance of the vision of the future that hospital managers should possess. Conclusion: Innovations may lead to evolution and renewal but increase institutional costs and expenses for the Health System. In this case study, there are still controversies about the clinical relevance of the additional benefits, which this study has not yet conclusively resolved. There were institutional gains in the missions of researching and teaching the state of the art. There is greater surgical capacity installed. More beds available provide greater healthcare resolution. Human resources are more comfortable and experienced. However, for patients, this has not yet influenced overall survival or cancer progression-free survival. In addition, the healthcare program costs raised since robotic surgery adoption. In 2021, the Health Ministry again ruled out the prospect of funding. The case of adopting innovation, as in this example, challenges hospital managers to innovate in methods to manage real-life data and anticipate the political-economic context determinants of the health sector. Documenting and disseminating knowledge and experiences can allow advances in Hospital Administration.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-12-05T13:23:28Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2022-12-05T13:23:28Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022-11-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10438/32962
url https://hdl.handle.net/10438/32962
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
collection Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/29f3e7f9-39a6-419b-83f6-cf00694f0d15/download
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/62171afe-537d-4929-86dd-3b9761db5a38/download
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/b222a783-6524-4b78-8d51-15bcc9d5b88a/download
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/66b18ec4-83f7-482a-bc55-4e2ea299aaa6/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv dfb340242cced38a6cca06c627998fa1
5490f610af0995ea10ca2a93d939653d
24af077962f80646ccf7fcff0dafe6b5
3c3d8a6be0823b2b8d2975b5ace047a4
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799582544196272128