Assessment of Industry Maturity Level 4.0: The Case of a Strategic Defense Company
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/455 |
Resumo: | Purpose – This article aims to evaluate the maturity level of a Strategic Defense Company (EED), from the perspective of Industry 4.0 concepts. The EED are characterized by high technological training and the ability to supply Strategic Defense Products (PED) to the Brazilian Armed Forces. Theoretical framework – The term Industry 4.0 has become one of the most recurring topics for the global manufacturing sector and in the academic world (Kagermann et al., 2013), however, academic literature on this topic is still scarce (Qin, Liu & Grosvenor, 2016). One of the problems that stands out is the lack of empirical evidence on the impacts that technologies of Industry 4.0 can have on the operational performance of companies. Instead of this new trend being accepted as dogma, it is necessary to prove its effects on companies, empirically. In this context, this study seeks answers to the following research question: What is the maturity level of Industry 4.0 in Strategic Defense Companies? Methodology – The research is classified in bibliographic, qualitative and descriptive, and uses the survey developed by the IMPULS Foundation, german consulting company, translated and adapted for this study, in the case of the Brazilian Military Material Industry (IMBEL). Findings – The results reveal that the analyzed company has an intermediate maturity level, categorized as learner in an Industry 4.0 maturity model. Research, Practical & Social implications – The research contributes to the empirical development of a model and provides an instrument for analyzing the maturity of Industry 4.0 that can be used in companies from different sectors. Regarding research limitations, it is pointed out that the empirically evaluated data could be validated through descriptive statistics, which would certainly generate greater confidence in the results, however, the study should have a larger sample of participating companies, not being the subject of this study. Originality – One of the gaps in the study of Industry 4.0, in Brazil, is the absence of empirical evidence on the impacts of enabling technologies of this new paradigma, and how they can contribute to the performance of companies. In view of this new tendency, it is necessary to analyze its impacts on companies, seeking to relate the theoretical constructs developed and the reality observed in companies. |
id |
FIA-1_94e3a6ecfa2e3fd016d8bd56d0fff48a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.future.emnuvens.com.br:article/455 |
network_acronym_str |
FIA-1 |
network_name_str |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assessment of Industry Maturity Level 4.0: The Case of a Strategic Defense CompanyAvaliação do Nível de Maturidade da Indústria 4.0: O Caso de uma Empresa Estratégica de DefesaIndustry 4.0AssessmentDefenseStrategic Defense CompaniesIMBELIndústria 4.0AvaliaçãoDefesaEmpresas Estratégicas de DefesaIMBELPurpose – This article aims to evaluate the maturity level of a Strategic Defense Company (EED), from the perspective of Industry 4.0 concepts. The EED are characterized by high technological training and the ability to supply Strategic Defense Products (PED) to the Brazilian Armed Forces. Theoretical framework – The term Industry 4.0 has become one of the most recurring topics for the global manufacturing sector and in the academic world (Kagermann et al., 2013), however, academic literature on this topic is still scarce (Qin, Liu & Grosvenor, 2016). One of the problems that stands out is the lack of empirical evidence on the impacts that technologies of Industry 4.0 can have on the operational performance of companies. Instead of this new trend being accepted as dogma, it is necessary to prove its effects on companies, empirically. In this context, this study seeks answers to the following research question: What is the maturity level of Industry 4.0 in Strategic Defense Companies? Methodology – The research is classified in bibliographic, qualitative and descriptive, and uses the survey developed by the IMPULS Foundation, german consulting company, translated and adapted for this study, in the case of the Brazilian Military Material Industry (IMBEL). Findings – The results reveal that the analyzed company has an intermediate maturity level, categorized as learner in an Industry 4.0 maturity model. Research, Practical & Social implications – The research contributes to the empirical development of a model and provides an instrument for analyzing the maturity of Industry 4.0 that can be used in companies from different sectors. Regarding research limitations, it is pointed out that the empirically evaluated data could be validated through descriptive statistics, which would certainly generate greater confidence in the results, however, the study should have a larger sample of participating companies, not being the subject of this study. Originality – One of the gaps in the study of Industry 4.0, in Brazil, is the absence of empirical evidence on the impacts of enabling technologies of this new paradigma, and how they can contribute to the performance of companies. In view of this new tendency, it is necessary to analyze its impacts on companies, seeking to relate the theoretical constructs developed and the reality observed in companies.Objetivo: Avaliar o nível de maturidade de uma Empresa Estratégica de Defesa (EED) sob a ótica dos conceitos da Indústria 4.0.Método: A pesquisa classifica-se em bibliográfica, qualitativa e descritiva, e utiliza-se do questionário desenvolvido pela Fundação IMPULS, empresa de consultoria alemã, traduzido e adaptado para este estudo, no caso da Indústria de Material Bélico do Brasil (IMBEL).Originalidade/Relevância: Um dos gaps no estudo da Indústria 4.0 no Brasil é a ausência de evidências empíricas sobre os impactos que as tecnologias decorrentes desse novo paradigma podem contribuir para o desempenho operacional das empresas. Diante dessa nova tendência, faz-se necessário analisar seus impactos nas empresas, de forma empírica, ao relacionar os construtos teóricos desenvolvidos e a realidade das empresas.Resultados: Os resultados revelam que a empresa analisada apresenta um nível de maturidade intermediário, categorizada como aprendiz em um modelo de maturidade da Indústria 4.0.Contribuições metodológicas: A pesquisa contribui com o desenvolvimento empírico de um modelo e fornece um instrumento de análise da maturidade da Indústria 4.0 que poderá ser utilizado em empresas de diferentes setores.Contribuições para a gestão: O questionário elaborado neste estudo (Apêndice), pode ser utilizado por outras Empresas Estratégicas de Defesa, além de outras empresas de manufatura de diferentes setores, para que possam avaliar o nível de maturidade da Indústria 4.0, com a finalidade de identificar as estratégias e o status de implementação desse novo modelo.Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies2020-02-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/45510.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2020.v12i1.455Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): January/April; 31-59Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies [FSRJ]; v. 12 n. 1 (2020): January - April; 31-592175-5825reponame:Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategiesinstname:Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)instacron:FIAporhttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/455/452Copyright (c) 2019 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategiesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Marcus Vinicius Gonçalves daRocha, Clarissa Figueredo2021-02-16T20:37:45Zoai:ojs.future.emnuvens.com.br:article/455Revistahttps://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/oai2175-58252175-5825opendoar:2021-02-16T20:37:45Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies - Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment of Industry Maturity Level 4.0: The Case of a Strategic Defense Company Avaliação do Nível de Maturidade da Indústria 4.0: O Caso de uma Empresa Estratégica de Defesa |
title |
Assessment of Industry Maturity Level 4.0: The Case of a Strategic Defense Company |
spellingShingle |
Assessment of Industry Maturity Level 4.0: The Case of a Strategic Defense Company Silva, Marcus Vinicius Gonçalves da Industry 4.0 Assessment Defense Strategic Defense Companies IMBEL Indústria 4.0 Avaliação Defesa Empresas Estratégicas de Defesa IMBEL |
title_short |
Assessment of Industry Maturity Level 4.0: The Case of a Strategic Defense Company |
title_full |
Assessment of Industry Maturity Level 4.0: The Case of a Strategic Defense Company |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of Industry Maturity Level 4.0: The Case of a Strategic Defense Company |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of Industry Maturity Level 4.0: The Case of a Strategic Defense Company |
title_sort |
Assessment of Industry Maturity Level 4.0: The Case of a Strategic Defense Company |
author |
Silva, Marcus Vinicius Gonçalves da |
author_facet |
Silva, Marcus Vinicius Gonçalves da Rocha, Clarissa Figueredo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha, Clarissa Figueredo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Marcus Vinicius Gonçalves da Rocha, Clarissa Figueredo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Industry 4.0 Assessment Defense Strategic Defense Companies IMBEL Indústria 4.0 Avaliação Defesa Empresas Estratégicas de Defesa IMBEL |
topic |
Industry 4.0 Assessment Defense Strategic Defense Companies IMBEL Indústria 4.0 Avaliação Defesa Empresas Estratégicas de Defesa IMBEL |
description |
Purpose – This article aims to evaluate the maturity level of a Strategic Defense Company (EED), from the perspective of Industry 4.0 concepts. The EED are characterized by high technological training and the ability to supply Strategic Defense Products (PED) to the Brazilian Armed Forces. Theoretical framework – The term Industry 4.0 has become one of the most recurring topics for the global manufacturing sector and in the academic world (Kagermann et al., 2013), however, academic literature on this topic is still scarce (Qin, Liu & Grosvenor, 2016). One of the problems that stands out is the lack of empirical evidence on the impacts that technologies of Industry 4.0 can have on the operational performance of companies. Instead of this new trend being accepted as dogma, it is necessary to prove its effects on companies, empirically. In this context, this study seeks answers to the following research question: What is the maturity level of Industry 4.0 in Strategic Defense Companies? Methodology – The research is classified in bibliographic, qualitative and descriptive, and uses the survey developed by the IMPULS Foundation, german consulting company, translated and adapted for this study, in the case of the Brazilian Military Material Industry (IMBEL). Findings – The results reveal that the analyzed company has an intermediate maturity level, categorized as learner in an Industry 4.0 maturity model. Research, Practical & Social implications – The research contributes to the empirical development of a model and provides an instrument for analyzing the maturity of Industry 4.0 that can be used in companies from different sectors. Regarding research limitations, it is pointed out that the empirically evaluated data could be validated through descriptive statistics, which would certainly generate greater confidence in the results, however, the study should have a larger sample of participating companies, not being the subject of this study. Originality – One of the gaps in the study of Industry 4.0, in Brazil, is the absence of empirical evidence on the impacts of enabling technologies of this new paradigma, and how they can contribute to the performance of companies. In view of this new tendency, it is necessary to analyze its impacts on companies, seeking to relate the theoretical constructs developed and the reality observed in companies. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/455 10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2020.v12i1.455 |
url |
https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/455 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2020.v12i1.455 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistafuture.org/FSRJ/article/view/455/452 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): January/April; 31-59 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies [FSRJ]; v. 12 n. 1 (2020): January - April; 31-59 2175-5825 reponame:Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies instname:Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA) instacron:FIA |
instname_str |
Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA) |
instacron_str |
FIA |
institution |
FIA |
reponame_str |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
collection |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies - Fundação Instituto de Administração (FIA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808843618143698944 |