The protection of the right to health in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mudrovitsch, Rodrigo de Bittencourt
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1195
Resumo: Objective: to discuss the effects of the autonomy of the right to health resulting from the development of article 26 of the American Convention in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Methods: we used the jurisprudential basis of decisions of the Court that present the indirect recognition of health as a fully justiciable right and those that recognize the direct justiciability of such right. Results: the first part of the investigation analyzed the nearly 20 years of historical evolution of the indirect justiciability of economic, social, cultural, and environmental rights in Inter-American Court case-law, whether through connection with the right to life or to personal integrity. The second part of the paper focuses on the decisions delivered by the Court from 2018 to 2022, beginning with the paradigmatic case Poblete Vilches y otros vs. Chile (2018), in which the right to health was established as a fully justiciable right before the Inter-American Court. Conclusion: a careful review of the jurisprudence leads to the conclusion that direct protection of the right to health is not inconsistent with any legitimate expectations of States because State obligations have been developed progressively by means of the connection principle. Furthermore, this research indicates two significant innovations resulting from the autonomy of the right to health: the persistence of intersectional vulnerabilities in such human rights violations, as well as State obligations concerning acts committed by private healthcare providers. This level of sophistication is required to outline the systematic reading of Inter-American Court case-law and for implementing the human right to health on the American continent. Received: 02/08/23 | Accepted: 06/09/23
id FIOCRUZ-3_cae9af2d23e4ed4c4c141fbab0da2023
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/1195
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-3
network_name_str Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The protection of the right to health in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human RightsLa tutela del derecho a la salud en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos HumanosA tutela do direito à saúde na jurisprudência da Corte Interamericana de Direitos HumanosDerechos HumanosDerecho a la SaludDerechos SocioeconómicosDerecho SanitarioDireitos HumanosDireito à SaúdeDireitos SocioeconômicosDireito SanitárioHuman RightsRight to HealthSocioeconomic RightsHealth LawObjective: to discuss the effects of the autonomy of the right to health resulting from the development of article 26 of the American Convention in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Methods: we used the jurisprudential basis of decisions of the Court that present the indirect recognition of health as a fully justiciable right and those that recognize the direct justiciability of such right. Results: the first part of the investigation analyzed the nearly 20 years of historical evolution of the indirect justiciability of economic, social, cultural, and environmental rights in Inter-American Court case-law, whether through connection with the right to life or to personal integrity. The second part of the paper focuses on the decisions delivered by the Court from 2018 to 2022, beginning with the paradigmatic case Poblete Vilches y otros vs. Chile (2018), in which the right to health was established as a fully justiciable right before the Inter-American Court. Conclusion: a careful review of the jurisprudence leads to the conclusion that direct protection of the right to health is not inconsistent with any legitimate expectations of States because State obligations have been developed progressively by means of the connection principle. Furthermore, this research indicates two significant innovations resulting from the autonomy of the right to health: the persistence of intersectional vulnerabilities in such human rights violations, as well as State obligations concerning acts committed by private healthcare providers. This level of sophistication is required to outline the systematic reading of Inter-American Court case-law and for implementing the human right to health on the American continent. Received: 02/08/23 | Accepted: 06/09/23Objetivo: discutir los efectos de la autonomía del derecho a la salud resultantes del desarrollo del artículo 26 de la Convención Americana en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Metodología: se utilizó la base jurisprudencial de las decisiones de la Corte que presentan el reconocimiento indirecto de la salud como un derecho plenamente justiciable y aquellas que reconocen la justiciabilidad directa de tal derecho.  Resultados: la primera parte de la investigación analizó casi 20 años de evolución histórica de la justiciabilidad indirecta de los derechos económicos, sociales, culturales y ambientales en la jurisprudencia interamericana, ya sea por conexión con el derecho a la vida o con el derecho a la integridad personal. A continuación, la segunda parte del artículo presenta las decisiones de los años 2018 a 2022, desde el paradigmático caso Poblete Vilches y otros vs. Chile (2018), en el que se reconoció el derecho a la salud como plenamente justiciable ante la Corte Interamericana. Conclusión: el análisis en profundidad del marco jurisprudencial interamericano permite concluir que la tutela directa del derecho a la salud no frustra ninguna expectativa legítima de los Estados, pues las obligaciones estatales se han desarollado progresivamente por vía de conexidad. Además, los principales resultados de esta investigación señalan las dos principales innovaciones derivadas de la autonomía del derecho a la salud: la presencia recurrente de vulnerabilidades interseccionales en las violaciones de los derechos humanos de esta naturaleza y las obligaciones del Estado en relación con los actos cometidos por los agentes privados en servicios de salud. Tales investigaciones en mayor profundidad son esenciales para hacer una lectura sistemática de la jurisprudencia interamericana y para lograr la efectividad del derecho humano a la salud en el continente americano. Recepción: 02/08/23 | Aceptación: 06/09/23Objetivo: discutir os efeitos da autonomia do direito à saúde decorrentes do desenvolvimento do art. 26 da Convenção Americana na jurisprudência da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos. Metodologia: utilizou-se a base jurisprudencial das decisões da Corte que apresentam o reconhecimento indireto da saúde como um direito plenamente justiciável e aquelas que reconhecem a justiciabilidade direta de tal direito. Resultados: a primeira parte da investigação analisou os quase 20 anos de evolução histórica da justiciabilidade indireta dos direitos econômicos, sociais, culturais e ambientais na jurisprudência interamericana, seja via conexão com o direito à vida ou com o direito à integridade pessoal. Na sequência, a segunda parte do artigo lança luz sobre as decisões dos anos de 2018 a 2022, inauguradas pelo caso paradigmático Poblete Vilches y otros vs. Chile (2018), nos quais houve a consagração do direito à saúde como direito plenamente justiciável perante a Corte. Conclusão: a análise detida do arcabouço jurisprudencial interamericano permite concluir que a tutela direta do direito à saúde não frustra quaisquer expectativas legítimas dos Estados em razão de as obrigações estatais terem sido desenvolvidas progressivamente por via de conexidade. Além disso, os principais resultados dessa pesquisa apontam para as duas principais inovações decorrentes da autonomia do direito à saúde: a presença recorrente das vulnerabilidades interseccionais nas violações de direitos humanos dessa natureza e as obrigações estatais referentes a atos cometidos por prestadores privados de serviços de saúde. Tais aprofundamentos são essenciais para delinear a leitura sistemática da jurisprudência interamericana e efetivar o direito humano à saúde no continente americano. Submissão: 02/08/23 | Aprovação: 06/09/23Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília2023-09-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/119510.17566/ciads.v12i3.1195Iberoamerican Journal of Health Law; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023): (JUL./SEPT. 2023); 91-102Cuadernos Iberoamericanos de Derecho Sanitario; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2023): (JUL./SEPT. 2023); 91-102Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário; v. 12 n. 3 (2023): (JUL./SET. 2023); 91-1022358-18242317-839610.17566/ciads.v12i3reponame:Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1195/1132Copyright (c) 2023 Rodrigo de Bittencourt Mudrovitsch (Autor)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMudrovitsch, Rodrigo de BittencourtMudrovitsch, Rodrigo de BittencourtMudrovitsch, Rodrigo de Bittencourt2023-11-17T13:49:04Zoai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/1195Revistahttp://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.brPUBhttp://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/oaicadernos.direitosanitario@fiocruz.br2358-18242317-8396opendoar:2023-11-17T13:49:04Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The protection of the right to health in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
La tutela del derecho a la salud en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos
A tutela do direito à saúde na jurisprudência da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos
title The protection of the right to health in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
spellingShingle The protection of the right to health in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Mudrovitsch, Rodrigo de Bittencourt
Derechos Humanos
Derecho a la Salud
Derechos Socioeconómicos
Derecho Sanitario
Direitos Humanos
Direito à Saúde
Direitos Socioeconômicos
Direito Sanitário
Human Rights
Right to Health
Socioeconomic Rights
Health Law
title_short The protection of the right to health in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
title_full The protection of the right to health in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
title_fullStr The protection of the right to health in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
title_full_unstemmed The protection of the right to health in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
title_sort The protection of the right to health in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
author Mudrovitsch, Rodrigo de Bittencourt
author_facet Mudrovitsch, Rodrigo de Bittencourt
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mudrovitsch, Rodrigo de Bittencourt
Mudrovitsch, Rodrigo de Bittencourt
Mudrovitsch, Rodrigo de Bittencourt
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Derechos Humanos
Derecho a la Salud
Derechos Socioeconómicos
Derecho Sanitario
Direitos Humanos
Direito à Saúde
Direitos Socioeconômicos
Direito Sanitário
Human Rights
Right to Health
Socioeconomic Rights
Health Law
topic Derechos Humanos
Derecho a la Salud
Derechos Socioeconómicos
Derecho Sanitario
Direitos Humanos
Direito à Saúde
Direitos Socioeconômicos
Direito Sanitário
Human Rights
Right to Health
Socioeconomic Rights
Health Law
description Objective: to discuss the effects of the autonomy of the right to health resulting from the development of article 26 of the American Convention in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Methods: we used the jurisprudential basis of decisions of the Court that present the indirect recognition of health as a fully justiciable right and those that recognize the direct justiciability of such right. Results: the first part of the investigation analyzed the nearly 20 years of historical evolution of the indirect justiciability of economic, social, cultural, and environmental rights in Inter-American Court case-law, whether through connection with the right to life or to personal integrity. The second part of the paper focuses on the decisions delivered by the Court from 2018 to 2022, beginning with the paradigmatic case Poblete Vilches y otros vs. Chile (2018), in which the right to health was established as a fully justiciable right before the Inter-American Court. Conclusion: a careful review of the jurisprudence leads to the conclusion that direct protection of the right to health is not inconsistent with any legitimate expectations of States because State obligations have been developed progressively by means of the connection principle. Furthermore, this research indicates two significant innovations resulting from the autonomy of the right to health: the persistence of intersectional vulnerabilities in such human rights violations, as well as State obligations concerning acts committed by private healthcare providers. This level of sophistication is required to outline the systematic reading of Inter-American Court case-law and for implementing the human right to health on the American continent. Received: 02/08/23 | Accepted: 06/09/23
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1195
10.17566/ciads.v12i3.1195
url https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1195
identifier_str_mv 10.17566/ciads.v12i3.1195
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1195/1132
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Rodrigo de Bittencourt Mudrovitsch (Autor)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Rodrigo de Bittencourt Mudrovitsch (Autor)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Iberoamerican Journal of Health Law; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023): (JUL./SEPT. 2023); 91-102
Cuadernos Iberoamericanos de Derecho Sanitario; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2023): (JUL./SEPT. 2023); 91-102
Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário; v. 12 n. 3 (2023): (JUL./SET. 2023); 91-102
2358-1824
2317-8396
10.17566/ciads.v12i3
reponame:Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
collection Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos.direitosanitario@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798942497640022016

Registros relacionados