Health´s judicialization in Brazil under the lens of the paradigmatic model of Strauss and Corbin: a bibliometric analysis

• Autor(a) principal: Tavares Amaral, Isabela
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Asensi, Felipe Dutra, Souza, Tiago Oliveira de, Nascimento, Fernanda Teles Morais do, Silva, Ítalo Rodolfo
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online)
• Texto Completo: https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/760
• topic: Health’s Judicialization; Bibliometrics; Right to health; Unifield Health System; Judicialización de la Salud; Bibliometría; Derecho a la Salud; Sistema Único de Salud; Judicialização da saúde; Bibliometria; Direito à Saúde; Sistema Único de Saúde

Objective: this study aims to identify in the variables proposed by the paradigmatic model of Strauss and Corbin, the characteristics of the articles that address in their contents, the judicialization of health in the context of the impacts and challenges generated for the Unified Health System. Methods: this is a bibliometric, descriptive study, with a quanti-qualitative approach. Data collection took place in June 2020, resulting in a universe of 63 articles. For data categorization, the paradigmatic model of Strauss and Corbin was adopted. In the quantitative analysis, the following variables were considered: regions of Brazil and institutions where the studies were affiliated; year of publication; professional training of authors; publishing periodicals; descriptors used; sphere of government addressed; and types of research. In the qualitative aspect, the main conclusions of the articles were analyzed. Results: publications from the Southeast region were the majority. The conclusions of the articles pointed out that judicialization as a guarantee of access to health care can be understood both as a cause of the phenomenon and because of it. Budgetary risk for public management and the relationship between the Executive and the Judiciary set the intervening factors. Conclusion: institutional dialogue is a path to be pursued to minimize possible harmful effects of the judicialization of health.