Consentir incertezas: o consentimento informado e a (des)regulação das tecnologias de reprodução assistida

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Susana Manuela Ribeiro Dias da
Data de Publicação: 2008
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3742
Resumo: This article aims to analyze the characteristics in the creation and utilization of self-knowledge by physicians and "laypersons" involved in assisted reproductive technologies, based on a comparison of their respective discursive practices concerning expectations, uncertainties, and responsibilities associated with these techniques in Portugal. Physicians evaluate the (un)certainties in the application of these techniques based on naturalist and essentialist categories. However, such arguments are then used as an ideological instrument to disguise the lack of a "scientific" explanation for the failures, thereby reproducing the belief in the "miraculous" nature of scientific and technological progress. The lay understanding of the benefits and limitations of these techniques reflects a reverential attitude towards medicine and the rationalist paradigm of the biomedical perspective, although it is possible to glimpse some spaces for autonomy and resistance vis-à-vis the medical proposals. The uncertainties of these techniques are conceptualized as exceptional and intrinsic effects of medical practice, to which one is required to submit individually. Women are particularly identified as the main parties responsible for maximizing the probability of "success" with these techniques.
id FIOCRUZ-5_00c1fba55a2e588d731808a1cdf21fed
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/3742
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Consentir incertezas: o consentimento informado e a (des)regulação das tecnologias de reprodução assistidaTécnicas Reprodutivas AssistidasConsentimento InformadoDesenvolvimento TecnológicoThis article aims to analyze the characteristics in the creation and utilization of self-knowledge by physicians and "laypersons" involved in assisted reproductive technologies, based on a comparison of their respective discursive practices concerning expectations, uncertainties, and responsibilities associated with these techniques in Portugal. Physicians evaluate the (un)certainties in the application of these techniques based on naturalist and essentialist categories. However, such arguments are then used as an ideological instrument to disguise the lack of a "scientific" explanation for the failures, thereby reproducing the belief in the "miraculous" nature of scientific and technological progress. The lay understanding of the benefits and limitations of these techniques reflects a reverential attitude towards medicine and the rationalist paradigm of the biomedical perspective, although it is possible to glimpse some spaces for autonomy and resistance vis-à-vis the medical proposals. The uncertainties of these techniques are conceptualized as exceptional and intrinsic effects of medical practice, to which one is required to submit individually. Women are particularly identified as the main parties responsible for maximizing the probability of "success" with these techniques.Este artigo visa a analisar os contornos locais de criação e utilização dos autoconhecimentos de médicos e "leigos" envolvidos em processos de procriação medicamente assistida a partir do confronto das práticas discursivas destes atores sociais em torno das expectativas, das incertezas e das responsabilidades associadas a estas técnicas em Portugal. Os médicos avaliam as (in)certezas das aplicações dessas técnicas com base em categorias de caráter naturalista e essencialista. Mais, esses critérios são instrumentalizados para eclipsar a ausência de explicação "científica" para os (in)sucessos, reproduzindo a crença no caráter "miraculoso" do progresso científico e tecnológico. A compreensão profana dos benefícios e das limitações dessas técnicas reflete uma atitude reverencial face à medicina e ao paradigma racionalista da perspectiva biomédica, ainda que seja possível vislumbrar alguns espaços de autonomia e resistência face às propostas médicas. As eventuais incertezas dessas técnicas são perspectivadas como efeitos excepcionais e intrínsecos à prática da medicina, aos quais têm de se submeter de forma individual. As mulheres, em particular, identificam-se como as principais responsáveis pela maximização da probabilidade de "sucesso" dessas técnicas.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2008-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3742Reports in Public Health; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2008): MarchCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 24 n. 3 (2008): Março1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3742/7587https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3742/7588Silva, Susana Manuela Ribeiro Dias dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:27:47Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/3742Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:04:18.089448Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Consentir incertezas: o consentimento informado e a (des)regulação das tecnologias de reprodução assistida
title Consentir incertezas: o consentimento informado e a (des)regulação das tecnologias de reprodução assistida
spellingShingle Consentir incertezas: o consentimento informado e a (des)regulação das tecnologias de reprodução assistida
Silva, Susana Manuela Ribeiro Dias da
Técnicas Reprodutivas Assistidas
Consentimento Informado
Desenvolvimento Tecnológico
title_short Consentir incertezas: o consentimento informado e a (des)regulação das tecnologias de reprodução assistida
title_full Consentir incertezas: o consentimento informado e a (des)regulação das tecnologias de reprodução assistida
title_fullStr Consentir incertezas: o consentimento informado e a (des)regulação das tecnologias de reprodução assistida
title_full_unstemmed Consentir incertezas: o consentimento informado e a (des)regulação das tecnologias de reprodução assistida
title_sort Consentir incertezas: o consentimento informado e a (des)regulação das tecnologias de reprodução assistida
author Silva, Susana Manuela Ribeiro Dias da
author_facet Silva, Susana Manuela Ribeiro Dias da
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Susana Manuela Ribeiro Dias da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Técnicas Reprodutivas Assistidas
Consentimento Informado
Desenvolvimento Tecnológico
topic Técnicas Reprodutivas Assistidas
Consentimento Informado
Desenvolvimento Tecnológico
description This article aims to analyze the characteristics in the creation and utilization of self-knowledge by physicians and "laypersons" involved in assisted reproductive technologies, based on a comparison of their respective discursive practices concerning expectations, uncertainties, and responsibilities associated with these techniques in Portugal. Physicians evaluate the (un)certainties in the application of these techniques based on naturalist and essentialist categories. However, such arguments are then used as an ideological instrument to disguise the lack of a "scientific" explanation for the failures, thereby reproducing the belief in the "miraculous" nature of scientific and technological progress. The lay understanding of the benefits and limitations of these techniques reflects a reverential attitude towards medicine and the rationalist paradigm of the biomedical perspective, although it is possible to glimpse some spaces for autonomy and resistance vis-à-vis the medical proposals. The uncertainties of these techniques are conceptualized as exceptional and intrinsic effects of medical practice, to which one is required to submit individually. Women are particularly identified as the main parties responsible for maximizing the probability of "success" with these techniques.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3742
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3742
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3742/7587
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/3742/7588
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2008): March
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 24 n. 3 (2008): Março
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943363439788032