The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Stella Regina Taquette
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo, Adriana de Oliveira Rodrigues
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5859
Resumo: We aimed to verify doctor's perception of the qualitative research method, via a qualitative study of interviews with questions on the academic profile of doctors and on the methodology. We interviewed 42 professionals, of which 18 had experience with the qualitative method and 24 with the quantitative method. The results showed that knowledge on the qualitative method was virtually nil among "quantitative researchers", who did not value qualitative research, although some of those realized that it would be important to be more accepting in clinical practice. Others only considered the method as subsidiary to quantitative. The majority considered qualitative methods as lacking academic structure, taking too long to conduct empirical studies, and being difficult to publish. All of them criticized the misuse of the method, and the "quantitatives" pointed out the problem of being unable to reproduce. We concluded that widening the use of the qualitative method by doctors requires investment from the beginning of the academic career and participation in qualitative research projects.
id FIOCRUZ-5_1a332a4027c6c64516ac8cac03a86376
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/5859
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologiesPercepção de pesquisadores médicos sobre metodologias qualitativasPhysiciansResearch PersonnelQualitative ResearchMédicosPesquisadoresPesquisa QualitativaWe aimed to verify doctor's perception of the qualitative research method, via a qualitative study of interviews with questions on the academic profile of doctors and on the methodology. We interviewed 42 professionals, of which 18 had experience with the qualitative method and 24 with the quantitative method. The results showed that knowledge on the qualitative method was virtually nil among "quantitative researchers", who did not value qualitative research, although some of those realized that it would be important to be more accepting in clinical practice. Others only considered the method as subsidiary to quantitative. The majority considered qualitative methods as lacking academic structure, taking too long to conduct empirical studies, and being difficult to publish. All of them criticized the misuse of the method, and the "quantitatives" pointed out the problem of being unable to reproduce. We concluded that widening the use of the qualitative method by doctors requires investment from the beginning of the academic career and participation in qualitative research projects.El objetivo es verificar la percepción de médicos sobre el método de investigación cualitativa. Se trata de un estudio cualitativo por medio de entrevistas con preguntas sobre el perfil de los médicos y sobre el método. Entrevistamos a 42 profesionales, 18 con experiencia en el método cualitativo y 24 con el cuantitativo. Los resultados mostraron que el conocimiento sobre lo cualitativo es casi nulo entre los "cuantitativistas", que no valoran la investigación cualitativa, aunque algunos se dan cuenta de que sería importante tener un enfoque más amplio en la práctica clínica. Otros la ven como subsidiaria a lo cuantitativo. Sus dificultades para utilizar ese abordaje son: falta de formación, cantidad de tiempo que exigen y problemas de publicación. Todos han criticado el mal uso del método. Los "cuantitativistas" han destacado como fragilidad, la no reproductibilidad. Llegamos a la conclusión de que para ampliar el uso de los abordajes cualitativos entre los médicos es importante invertir en su formación desde el inicio del curso y la participación en proyectos de investigación cualitativa.Objetivamos verificar a percepção de médicos sobre o método qualitativo de pesquisa. Estudo qualitativo por meio de entrevistas com questões sobre o perfil acadêmico do médico e perguntas abertas a respeito do método. Entrevistamos 42 profissionais, sendo 18 com experiência no método qualitativo e 24 com o quantitativo. Os resultados evidenciaram que o conhecimento sobre o qualitativo é quase nulo entre os pesquisadores "quantitativistas", os quais não valorizam a pesquisa qualitativa, embora alguns percebam que seria importante ter uma postura mais compreensiva na prática clínica. Outros só a veem como subsidiária ao quantitativo. As principais dificuldades da maioria são: falta de formação, tempo longo despendido nos estudos empíricos e dificuldade de publicação. Todos os entrevistados criticaram o mau uso do método, e os "quantitativistas" ressaltaram, como problema, sua não reprodutibilidade. Concluímos que ampliar o uso do método qualitativo por médicos exige investimento na formação desde o início da graduação e participação em projetos de pesquisa qualitativa.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2015-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5859Reports in Public Health; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2015): AprilCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 31 n. 4 (2015): Abril1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZengporhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5859/12257https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5859/12258https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5859/12259https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5859/12260Stella Regina TaquetteMaria Cecília de Souza MinayoAdriana de Oliveira Rodriguesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:28:58Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/5859Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:06:42.485121Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
Percepção de pesquisadores médicos sobre metodologias qualitativas
title The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
spellingShingle The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
Stella Regina Taquette
Physicians
Research Personnel
Qualitative Research
Médicos
Pesquisadores
Pesquisa Qualitativa
title_short The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
title_full The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
title_fullStr The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
title_full_unstemmed The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
title_sort The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
author Stella Regina Taquette
author_facet Stella Regina Taquette
Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo
Adriana de Oliveira Rodrigues
author_role author
author2 Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo
Adriana de Oliveira Rodrigues
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Stella Regina Taquette
Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo
Adriana de Oliveira Rodrigues
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Physicians
Research Personnel
Qualitative Research
Médicos
Pesquisadores
Pesquisa Qualitativa
topic Physicians
Research Personnel
Qualitative Research
Médicos
Pesquisadores
Pesquisa Qualitativa
description We aimed to verify doctor's perception of the qualitative research method, via a qualitative study of interviews with questions on the academic profile of doctors and on the methodology. We interviewed 42 professionals, of which 18 had experience with the qualitative method and 24 with the quantitative method. The results showed that knowledge on the qualitative method was virtually nil among "quantitative researchers", who did not value qualitative research, although some of those realized that it would be important to be more accepting in clinical practice. Others only considered the method as subsidiary to quantitative. The majority considered qualitative methods as lacking academic structure, taking too long to conduct empirical studies, and being difficult to publish. All of them criticized the misuse of the method, and the "quantitatives" pointed out the problem of being unable to reproduce. We concluded that widening the use of the qualitative method by doctors requires investment from the beginning of the academic career and participation in qualitative research projects.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5859
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5859
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5859/12257
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5859/12258
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5859/12259
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/5859/12260
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
text/html
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2015): April
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 31 n. 4 (2015): Abril
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943379511312384