The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Taquette,Stella Regina
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Minayo,Maria Cecília de Souza, Rodrigues,Adriana de Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2015000400722
Resumo: We aimed to verify doctor's perception of the qualitative research method, via a qualitative study of interviews with questions on the academic profile of doctors and on the methodology. We interviewed 42 professionals, of which 18 had experience with the qualitative method and 24 with the quantitative method. The results showed that knowledge on the qualitative method was virtually nil among "quantitative researchers", who did not value qualitative research, although some of those realized that it would be important to be more accepting in clinical practice. Others only considered the method as subsidiary to quantitative. The majority considered qualitative methods as lacking academic structure, taking too long to conduct empirical studies, and being difficult to publish. All of them criticized the misuse of the method, and the "quantitatives" pointed out the problem of being unable to reproduce. We concluded that widening the use of the qualitative method by doctors requires investment from the beginning of the academic career and participation in qualitative research projects.
id FIOCRUZ-5_d8e533ca47c5a5a55eb0a0a845b24169
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-311X2015000400722
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologiesPhysiciansResearch PersonnelQualitative ResearchWe aimed to verify doctor's perception of the qualitative research method, via a qualitative study of interviews with questions on the academic profile of doctors and on the methodology. We interviewed 42 professionals, of which 18 had experience with the qualitative method and 24 with the quantitative method. The results showed that knowledge on the qualitative method was virtually nil among "quantitative researchers", who did not value qualitative research, although some of those realized that it would be important to be more accepting in clinical practice. Others only considered the method as subsidiary to quantitative. The majority considered qualitative methods as lacking academic structure, taking too long to conduct empirical studies, and being difficult to publish. All of them criticized the misuse of the method, and the "quantitatives" pointed out the problem of being unable to reproduce. We concluded that widening the use of the qualitative method by doctors requires investment from the beginning of the academic career and participation in qualitative research projects.Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz2015-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2015000400722Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.31 n.4 2015reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZ10.1590/0102-311X00094414info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTaquette,Stella ReginaMinayo,Maria Cecília de SouzaRodrigues,Adriana de Oliveiraeng2015-07-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-311X2015000400722Revistahttp://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/csp/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2015-07-08T00:00Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
title The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
spellingShingle The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
Taquette,Stella Regina
Physicians
Research Personnel
Qualitative Research
title_short The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
title_full The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
title_fullStr The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
title_full_unstemmed The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
title_sort The perceptions of medical researchers on qualitative methodologies
author Taquette,Stella Regina
author_facet Taquette,Stella Regina
Minayo,Maria Cecília de Souza
Rodrigues,Adriana de Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Minayo,Maria Cecília de Souza
Rodrigues,Adriana de Oliveira
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Taquette,Stella Regina
Minayo,Maria Cecília de Souza
Rodrigues,Adriana de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Physicians
Research Personnel
Qualitative Research
topic Physicians
Research Personnel
Qualitative Research
description We aimed to verify doctor's perception of the qualitative research method, via a qualitative study of interviews with questions on the academic profile of doctors and on the methodology. We interviewed 42 professionals, of which 18 had experience with the qualitative method and 24 with the quantitative method. The results showed that knowledge on the qualitative method was virtually nil among "quantitative researchers", who did not value qualitative research, although some of those realized that it would be important to be more accepting in clinical practice. Others only considered the method as subsidiary to quantitative. The majority considered qualitative methods as lacking academic structure, taking too long to conduct empirical studies, and being difficult to publish. All of them criticized the misuse of the method, and the "quantitatives" pointed out the problem of being unable to reproduce. We concluded that widening the use of the qualitative method by doctors requires investment from the beginning of the academic career and participation in qualitative research projects.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2015000400722
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2015000400722
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0102-311X00094414
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.31 n.4 2015
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1754115735417782272