Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng spa |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153 |
Resumo: | This article presents the results of a dialogue between decision-makers and experts in Latin America and the Caribbean on priority-setting for interventions and studies on Aedes aegypti control. The article is part of a project that included a systematic review of mosquito control strategies and a qualitative study with key informants from the region. Using a collective deliberative process assisted by the results of the above-mentioned projects, a list of priorities was developed by consensus for the implementation of vector control strategies and the development of key regional research lines. It was agreed that the best strategy is integrated vector management, divided into: (a) chemical control; (b) biological control; (c) environmental management; (d) community participation; and (e) integrated surveillance. The workshop highlighted the crucial role of government leadership and inter-sector coordination between government agencies and civil society stakeholders. The proposed priorities for research lines were: Ae. aegypti vector competence and associated factors; community components of interventions; incorporation of technology into vector control and monitoring; most efficient modalities of integrated surveillance; entomological indicators with the best predictive capacity; and resistance to insecticides. The policy dialogue methodology allowed validating and enriching the results of other levels of research, besides establishing priorities for regional research and control strategies. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-5_22a06464fc69908bc5ff135148b390df |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7153 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-5 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogueTaller de priorización de intervenciones para el control del mosquito Aedes aegypti en Latinoamérica y el Caribe: diálogo de políticasAedes aegyptiEnvironmental AdministrationPublic PolicyAedes aegyptiAdministración AmbientalPolítica PúblicaThis article presents the results of a dialogue between decision-makers and experts in Latin America and the Caribbean on priority-setting for interventions and studies on Aedes aegypti control. The article is part of a project that included a systematic review of mosquito control strategies and a qualitative study with key informants from the region. Using a collective deliberative process assisted by the results of the above-mentioned projects, a list of priorities was developed by consensus for the implementation of vector control strategies and the development of key regional research lines. It was agreed that the best strategy is integrated vector management, divided into: (a) chemical control; (b) biological control; (c) environmental management; (d) community participation; and (e) integrated surveillance. The workshop highlighted the crucial role of government leadership and inter-sector coordination between government agencies and civil society stakeholders. The proposed priorities for research lines were: Ae. aegypti vector competence and associated factors; community components of interventions; incorporation of technology into vector control and monitoring; most efficient modalities of integrated surveillance; entomological indicators with the best predictive capacity; and resistance to insecticides. The policy dialogue methodology allowed validating and enriching the results of other levels of research, besides establishing priorities for regional research and control strategies.Este trabajo presenta los resultados de un diálogo entre tomadores de decisión y expertos de América Latina y el Caribe sobre la priorización de intervenciones e investigaciones para el control del mosquito Aedes aegypti. Forma parte de un proyecto que comprendió una revisión sistemática sobre estrategias control del mosquito y un estudio cualitativo con informantes clave de la región. Mediante un proceso deliberativo en instancias colectivas, asistido por los resultados de los mencionados proyectos, se elaboró un listado consensuado de prioridades de implementación de estrategias de control vectorial y de desarrollo regional de líneas clave de investigación. Se convino en que la mejor estrategia es el manejo integrado de vectores o Estrategia de Gestión Integrada, desagregada en: (a) control químico; (b) control biológico; (c) manejo ambiental; (d) participación comunitaria; y (e) vigilancia integrada. Se destacó el fundamental e indelegable rol de rectoría del estado y la coordinación intersectorial entre agencias estatales y con actores de la sociedad civil. Se propuso priorizar como líneas de investigación: la capacidad vectorial del Ae. aegypti y factores asociados; componentes comunitarios de las intervenciones; la incorporación de tecnología al control vectorial y al monitoreo; los modos más eficientes de vigilancia integrada; indicadores entomológicos con mejor capacidad predictiva y resistencia a insecticidas. La metodología del diálogo de políticas permitió validar y enriquecer los resultados de otras instancias de investigación, y permitió establecer prioridades sobre investigación y estrategias para el control regional.Este trabalho apresenta os resultados de um diálogo entre tomadores de decisão e expertos da América Latina e do Caribe sobre a priorização de intervenções e pesquisas para o controle do mosquito Aedes aegypti. Faz parte de um projeto que compreendeu uma revisão sistemática sobre estratégias e controle do mosquito e um estudo qualitativo com informantes chave da região. Através de um processo deliberativo em instâncias coletivas, assistido pelos resultados dos mencionados projetos, foi elaborada uma listagem consensuada de prioridades de implementação de estratégias de controle vetorial e de desenvolvimento regional de linhas essenciais de pesquisa. Foi acordado que a melhor estratégia é a gestão integrada de vetores ou Estratégia de Gestão Integrada, desagregada em: (a) controle químico; (b) controle biológico; (c) gestão ambiental; (d) participação comunitária; (e) vigilância integrada. Foi destacado o rol fundamental e indelegável da direção do estado e a coordenação intersetorial entre agências estaduais com atores da sociedade civil. Foi proposto priorizar como linhas de pesquisa: a capacidade vetorial do Ae. aegypti e fatores associados; componentes comunitários das intervenções; a incorporação de tecnologia para o controle vetorial e para o monitoramento; modos mais eficientes de vigilância integrada; indicadores entomológicos com melhor capacidade preditiva e resistência a pesticidas. A metodologia do diálogo de políticas permitiu validar e enriquecer os resultados de outras áreas de pesquisa, possibilitou estabelecer prioridades a propósito da pesquisa, além de estratégias para o controle regional.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2019-04-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153Reports in Public Health; Vol. 35 No. 4 (2019): AprilCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 35 n. 4 (2019): Abril1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZengspahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15636https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15637https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15638https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15639Agustin CiapponiAriel BardachAndrea AlcarazMaría BelizánDaniel JonesMariana ComolliSilvina Denis Ruvinskyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:29:46Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7153Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:08:14.017594Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue Taller de priorización de intervenciones para el control del mosquito Aedes aegypti en Latinoamérica y el Caribe: diálogo de políticas |
title |
Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue |
spellingShingle |
Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue Agustin Ciapponi Aedes aegypti Environmental Administration Public Policy Aedes aegypti Administración Ambiental Política Pública |
title_short |
Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue |
title_full |
Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue |
title_fullStr |
Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue |
title_full_unstemmed |
Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue |
title_sort |
Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue |
author |
Agustin Ciapponi |
author_facet |
Agustin Ciapponi Ariel Bardach Andrea Alcaraz María Belizán Daniel Jones Mariana Comolli Silvina Denis Ruvinsky |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ariel Bardach Andrea Alcaraz María Belizán Daniel Jones Mariana Comolli Silvina Denis Ruvinsky |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Agustin Ciapponi Ariel Bardach Andrea Alcaraz María Belizán Daniel Jones Mariana Comolli Silvina Denis Ruvinsky |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aedes aegypti Environmental Administration Public Policy Aedes aegypti Administración Ambiental Política Pública |
topic |
Aedes aegypti Environmental Administration Public Policy Aedes aegypti Administración Ambiental Política Pública |
description |
This article presents the results of a dialogue between decision-makers and experts in Latin America and the Caribbean on priority-setting for interventions and studies on Aedes aegypti control. The article is part of a project that included a systematic review of mosquito control strategies and a qualitative study with key informants from the region. Using a collective deliberative process assisted by the results of the above-mentioned projects, a list of priorities was developed by consensus for the implementation of vector control strategies and the development of key regional research lines. It was agreed that the best strategy is integrated vector management, divided into: (a) chemical control; (b) biological control; (c) environmental management; (d) community participation; and (e) integrated surveillance. The workshop highlighted the crucial role of government leadership and inter-sector coordination between government agencies and civil society stakeholders. The proposed priorities for research lines were: Ae. aegypti vector competence and associated factors; community components of interventions; incorporation of technology into vector control and monitoring; most efficient modalities of integrated surveillance; entomological indicators with the best predictive capacity; and resistance to insecticides. The policy dialogue methodology allowed validating and enriching the results of other levels of research, besides establishing priorities for regional research and control strategies. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153 |
url |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng spa |
language |
eng spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15636 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15637 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15638 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15639 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html text/html application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health; Vol. 35 No. 4 (2019): April Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 35 n. 4 (2019): Abril 1678-4464 0102-311X reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798943389919477760 |