Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Agustin Ciapponi
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Ariel Bardach, Andrea Alcaraz, María Belizán, Daniel Jones, Mariana Comolli, Silvina Denis Ruvinsky
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
spa
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153
Resumo: This article presents the results of a dialogue between decision-makers and experts in Latin America and the Caribbean on priority-setting for interventions and studies on Aedes aegypti control. The article is part of a project that included a systematic review of mosquito control strategies and a qualitative study with key informants from the region. Using a collective deliberative process assisted by the results of the above-mentioned projects, a list of priorities was developed by consensus for the implementation of vector control strategies and the development of key regional research lines. It was agreed that the best strategy is integrated vector management, divided into: (a) chemical control; (b) biological control; (c) environmental management; (d) community participation; and (e) integrated surveillance. The workshop highlighted the crucial role of government leadership and inter-sector coordination between government agencies and civil society stakeholders. The proposed priorities for research lines were: Ae. aegypti vector competence and associated factors; community components of interventions; incorporation of technology into vector control and monitoring; most efficient modalities of integrated surveillance; entomological indicators with the best predictive capacity; and resistance to insecticides. The policy dialogue methodology allowed validating and enriching the results of other levels of research, besides establishing priorities for regional research and control strategies.
id FIOCRUZ-5_22a06464fc69908bc5ff135148b390df
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7153
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogueTaller de priorización de intervenciones para el control del mosquito Aedes aegypti en Latinoamérica y el Caribe: diálogo de políticasAedes aegyptiEnvironmental AdministrationPublic PolicyAedes aegyptiAdministración AmbientalPolítica PúblicaThis article presents the results of a dialogue between decision-makers and experts in Latin America and the Caribbean on priority-setting for interventions and studies on Aedes aegypti control. The article is part of a project that included a systematic review of mosquito control strategies and a qualitative study with key informants from the region. Using a collective deliberative process assisted by the results of the above-mentioned projects, a list of priorities was developed by consensus for the implementation of vector control strategies and the development of key regional research lines. It was agreed that the best strategy is integrated vector management, divided into: (a) chemical control; (b) biological control; (c) environmental management; (d) community participation; and (e) integrated surveillance. The workshop highlighted the crucial role of government leadership and inter-sector coordination between government agencies and civil society stakeholders. The proposed priorities for research lines were: Ae. aegypti vector competence and associated factors; community components of interventions; incorporation of technology into vector control and monitoring; most efficient modalities of integrated surveillance; entomological indicators with the best predictive capacity; and resistance to insecticides. The policy dialogue methodology allowed validating and enriching the results of other levels of research, besides establishing priorities for regional research and control strategies.Este trabajo presenta los resultados de un diálogo entre tomadores de decisión y expertos de América Latina y el Caribe sobre la priorización de intervenciones e investigaciones para el control del mosquito Aedes aegypti. Forma parte de un proyecto que comprendió una revisión sistemática sobre estrategias control del mosquito y un estudio cualitativo con informantes clave de la región. Mediante un proceso deliberativo en instancias colectivas, asistido por los resultados de los mencionados proyectos, se elaboró un listado consensuado de prioridades de implementación de estrategias de control vectorial y de desarrollo regional de líneas clave de investigación. Se convino en que la mejor estrategia es el manejo integrado de vectores o Estrategia de Gestión Integrada, desagregada en: (a) control químico; (b) control biológico; (c) manejo ambiental; (d) participación comunitaria; y (e) vigilancia integrada. Se destacó el fundamental e indelegable rol de rectoría del estado y la coordinación intersectorial entre agencias estatales y con actores de la sociedad civil. Se propuso priorizar como líneas de investigación: la capacidad vectorial del Ae. aegypti y factores asociados; componentes comunitarios de las intervenciones; la incorporación de tecnología al control vectorial y al monitoreo; los modos más eficientes de vigilancia integrada; indicadores entomológicos con mejor capacidad predictiva y resistencia a insecticidas. La metodología del diálogo de políticas permitió validar y enriquecer los resultados de otras instancias de investigación, y permitió establecer prioridades sobre investigación y estrategias para el control regional.Este trabalho apresenta os resultados de um diálogo entre tomadores de decisão e expertos da América Latina e do Caribe sobre a priorização de intervenções e pesquisas para o controle do mosquito Aedes aegypti. Faz parte de um projeto que compreendeu uma revisão sistemática sobre estratégias e controle do mosquito e um estudo qualitativo com informantes chave da região. Através de um processo deliberativo em instâncias coletivas, assistido pelos resultados dos mencionados projetos, foi elaborada uma listagem consensuada de prioridades de implementação de estratégias de controle vetorial e de desenvolvimento regional de linhas essenciais de pesquisa. Foi acordado que a melhor estratégia é a gestão integrada de vetores ou Estratégia de Gestão Integrada, desagregada em: (a) controle químico; (b) controle biológico; (c) gestão ambiental; (d) participação comunitária; (e) vigilância integrada. Foi destacado o rol fundamental e indelegável da direção do estado e a coordenação intersetorial entre agências estaduais com atores da sociedade civil. Foi proposto priorizar como linhas de pesquisa: a capacidade vetorial do Ae. aegypti e fatores associados; componentes comunitários das intervenções; a incorporação de tecnologia para o controle vetorial e para o monitoramento; modos mais eficientes de vigilância integrada; indicadores entomológicos com melhor capacidade preditiva e resistência a pesticidas. A metodologia do diálogo de políticas permitiu validar e enriquecer os resultados de outras áreas de pesquisa, possibilitou estabelecer prioridades a propósito da pesquisa, além de estratégias para o controle regional.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2019-04-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153Reports in Public Health; Vol. 35 No. 4 (2019): AprilCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 35 n. 4 (2019): Abril1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZengspahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15636https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15637https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15638https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15639Agustin CiapponiAriel BardachAndrea AlcarazMaría BelizánDaniel JonesMariana ComolliSilvina Denis Ruvinskyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:29:46Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7153Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:08:14.017594Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue
Taller de priorización de intervenciones para el control del mosquito Aedes aegypti en Latinoamérica y el Caribe: diálogo de políticas
title Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue
spellingShingle Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue
Agustin Ciapponi
Aedes aegypti
Environmental Administration
Public Policy
Aedes aegypti
Administración Ambiental
Política Pública
title_short Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue
title_full Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue
title_fullStr Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue
title_full_unstemmed Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue
title_sort Workshop for priority-setting in Aedes aegypti control interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean: a policy dialogue
author Agustin Ciapponi
author_facet Agustin Ciapponi
Ariel Bardach
Andrea Alcaraz
María Belizán
Daniel Jones
Mariana Comolli
Silvina Denis Ruvinsky
author_role author
author2 Ariel Bardach
Andrea Alcaraz
María Belizán
Daniel Jones
Mariana Comolli
Silvina Denis Ruvinsky
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Agustin Ciapponi
Ariel Bardach
Andrea Alcaraz
María Belizán
Daniel Jones
Mariana Comolli
Silvina Denis Ruvinsky
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aedes aegypti
Environmental Administration
Public Policy
Aedes aegypti
Administración Ambiental
Política Pública
topic Aedes aegypti
Environmental Administration
Public Policy
Aedes aegypti
Administración Ambiental
Política Pública
description This article presents the results of a dialogue between decision-makers and experts in Latin America and the Caribbean on priority-setting for interventions and studies on Aedes aegypti control. The article is part of a project that included a systematic review of mosquito control strategies and a qualitative study with key informants from the region. Using a collective deliberative process assisted by the results of the above-mentioned projects, a list of priorities was developed by consensus for the implementation of vector control strategies and the development of key regional research lines. It was agreed that the best strategy is integrated vector management, divided into: (a) chemical control; (b) biological control; (c) environmental management; (d) community participation; and (e) integrated surveillance. The workshop highlighted the crucial role of government leadership and inter-sector coordination between government agencies and civil society stakeholders. The proposed priorities for research lines were: Ae. aegypti vector competence and associated factors; community components of interventions; incorporation of technology into vector control and monitoring; most efficient modalities of integrated surveillance; entomological indicators with the best predictive capacity; and resistance to insecticides. The policy dialogue methodology allowed validating and enriching the results of other levels of research, besides establishing priorities for regional research and control strategies.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
spa
language eng
spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15636
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15637
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15638
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7153/15639
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
text/html
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 35 No. 4 (2019): April
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 35 n. 4 (2019): Abril
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943389919477760