How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524 |
Resumo: | Immunization, the most successful public health intervention to date, can only be effective if eligible individuals or their legal representatives have access to vaccines and subsequently comply with their use. Under-vaccination stems from multiple causes: access, affordability, awareness, acceptance and activation. In this paper, we focus on acceptance and, specifically, on factors pertaining to individual or parental compliance, specifically the psychology of judgment and decision making. We describe how heuristics and cognitive biases - a facet of thoughts and feelings - affect vaccination decision making. Additionally, we address when and how social processes play a role and how attitudes towards vaccines might reflect a more general underlying attitude or ideology. The understanding of how decision making, with regards to vaccines occurs, and the role played by heuristics and cognitive biases can help inform more appropriate public health interventions. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-5_3da73ca8397179e26d8bda4728413d17 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7524 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-5 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisionsComo as heurísticas e os vieses cognitivos afetam as decisões sobre vacinaçãoVaccinationCognitionHeuristicsVacinaçãoCogniçãoHeurísticaImmunization, the most successful public health intervention to date, can only be effective if eligible individuals or their legal representatives have access to vaccines and subsequently comply with their use. Under-vaccination stems from multiple causes: access, affordability, awareness, acceptance and activation. In this paper, we focus on acceptance and, specifically, on factors pertaining to individual or parental compliance, specifically the psychology of judgment and decision making. We describe how heuristics and cognitive biases - a facet of thoughts and feelings - affect vaccination decision making. Additionally, we address when and how social processes play a role and how attitudes towards vaccines might reflect a more general underlying attitude or ideology. The understanding of how decision making, with regards to vaccines occurs, and the role played by heuristics and cognitive biases can help inform more appropriate public health interventions.La inmunización es la intervención en salud pública más exitosa hasta la fecha. No obstante, sólo puede ser efectiva si las personas elegibles, o sus representantes legales, tienen acceso a las vacunas y, consecuentemente, cumplen con su uso. Existen múltiples causas de infravacunación: acceso, asequibilidad, concienciación, aceptación y activación. En este trabajo, nos enfocamos en la aceptación y esceficamente, centrándonos en factores respecto a la conformidad individual o parental, específicamente en cuanto a la psicología de juicio y toma de decisiones. Describimos como sesgos heurísticos y cognitivos -una faceta de pensamientos y sentimientos- que afectan a la toma de decisiones sobre la vacunación. Asimismo, nos centramos en cuándo y cómo los procesos sociales desempeñan un papel y cómo las actitudes hacia las vacunas quizás reflejen una actitud subyacente más general o ideológica. La compresión sobre cómo se toman las decisiones, en relación a cuándo se tienen que tomar las vacunas y el papel desempeñado por sesgos heurísticos y cognitivos puede informarnos más apropiadamente sobre las intervenciones en salud pública.A imunização, a intervenção da saúde pública mais bem sucedida até hoje, só pode ser eficaz se as pessoas elegíveis ou seus representantes legais tiverem acesso às vacinas e aderirem ao seu uso. A subvacinação pode resultar de várias causas: acesso, viabilidade, conscientização, aceitação e ativação. Neste trabalho, focamos na aceitação e, especificamente, nos concentramos nos fatores relativos à cooperação do indivíduo ou de seus pais, especificamente a psicologia do julgamento e da tomada de decisões. Descrevemos como as heurísticas e os vieses cognitivos - um aspecto dos pensamentos e sentimentos - afetam a tomada de decisão quanto à vacinação. Além disso, abordamos quando e como os processos sociais desempenham um papel e como as atitudes em relação às vacinas podem refletir uma atitude ou ideologia subjacente mais geral. A compreensão de como a tomada de decisões em relação às vacinas ocorre e o papel desempenhado pelas heurísticas e pelos vieses cognitivos pode ajudar a informar as intervenções de saúde pública de forma mais adequada.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2020-11-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524Reports in Public Health; Vol. 36 No. 14 (2020): Supplement 2Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 36 n. 14 (2020): Suplemento 21678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZengporhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16698https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16699https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16700https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16701Paula Mendes LuzPaulo NadanovskyJulie Leaskinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:30:01Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7524Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:08:39.476723Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions Como as heurísticas e os vieses cognitivos afetam as decisões sobre vacinação |
title |
How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions |
spellingShingle |
How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions Paula Mendes Luz Vaccination Cognition Heuristics Vacinação Cognição Heurística |
title_short |
How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions |
title_full |
How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions |
title_fullStr |
How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions |
title_full_unstemmed |
How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions |
title_sort |
How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions |
author |
Paula Mendes Luz |
author_facet |
Paula Mendes Luz Paulo Nadanovsky Julie Leask |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Paulo Nadanovsky Julie Leask |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paula Mendes Luz Paulo Nadanovsky Julie Leask |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Vaccination Cognition Heuristics Vacinação Cognição Heurística |
topic |
Vaccination Cognition Heuristics Vacinação Cognição Heurística |
description |
Immunization, the most successful public health intervention to date, can only be effective if eligible individuals or their legal representatives have access to vaccines and subsequently comply with their use. Under-vaccination stems from multiple causes: access, affordability, awareness, acceptance and activation. In this paper, we focus on acceptance and, specifically, on factors pertaining to individual or parental compliance, specifically the psychology of judgment and decision making. We describe how heuristics and cognitive biases - a facet of thoughts and feelings - affect vaccination decision making. Additionally, we address when and how social processes play a role and how attitudes towards vaccines might reflect a more general underlying attitude or ideology. The understanding of how decision making, with regards to vaccines occurs, and the role played by heuristics and cognitive biases can help inform more appropriate public health interventions. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524 |
url |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16698 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16699 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16700 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16701 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html text/html application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health; Vol. 36 No. 14 (2020): Supplement 2 Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 36 n. 14 (2020): Suplemento 2 1678-4464 0102-311X reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798943393089323008 |