How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paula Mendes Luz
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Paulo Nadanovsky, Julie Leask
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524
Resumo: Immunization, the most successful public health intervention to date, can only be effective if eligible individuals or their legal representatives have access to vaccines and subsequently comply with their use. Under-vaccination stems from multiple causes: access, affordability, awareness, acceptance and activation. In this paper, we focus on acceptance and, specifically, on factors pertaining to individual or parental compliance, specifically the psychology of judgment and decision making. We describe how heuristics and cognitive biases - a facet of thoughts and feelings - affect vaccination decision making. Additionally, we address when and how social processes play a role and how attitudes towards vaccines might reflect a more general underlying attitude or ideology. The understanding of how decision making, with regards to vaccines occurs, and the role played by heuristics and cognitive biases can help inform more appropriate public health interventions.
id FIOCRUZ-5_3da73ca8397179e26d8bda4728413d17
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7524
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisionsComo as heurísticas e os vieses cognitivos afetam as decisões sobre vacinaçãoVaccinationCognitionHeuristicsVacinaçãoCogniçãoHeurísticaImmunization, the most successful public health intervention to date, can only be effective if eligible individuals or their legal representatives have access to vaccines and subsequently comply with their use. Under-vaccination stems from multiple causes: access, affordability, awareness, acceptance and activation. In this paper, we focus on acceptance and, specifically, on factors pertaining to individual or parental compliance, specifically the psychology of judgment and decision making. We describe how heuristics and cognitive biases - a facet of thoughts and feelings - affect vaccination decision making. Additionally, we address when and how social processes play a role and how attitudes towards vaccines might reflect a more general underlying attitude or ideology. The understanding of how decision making, with regards to vaccines occurs, and the role played by heuristics and cognitive biases can help inform more appropriate public health interventions.La inmunización es la intervención en salud pública más exitosa hasta la fecha. No obstante, sólo puede ser efectiva si las personas elegibles, o sus representantes legales, tienen acceso a las vacunas y, consecuentemente, cumplen con su uso. Existen múltiples causas de infravacunación: acceso, asequibilidad, concienciación, aceptación y activación. En este trabajo, nos enfocamos en la aceptación y esceficamente, centrándonos en factores respecto a la conformidad individual o parental, específicamente en cuanto a la psicología de juicio y toma de decisiones. Describimos como sesgos heurísticos y cognitivos -una faceta de pensamientos y sentimientos- que afectan a la toma de decisiones sobre la vacunación. Asimismo, nos centramos en cuándo y cómo los procesos sociales desempeñan un papel y cómo las actitudes hacia las vacunas quizás reflejen una actitud subyacente más general o ideológica. La compresión sobre cómo se toman las decisiones, en relación a cuándo se tienen que tomar las vacunas y el papel desempeñado por sesgos heurísticos y cognitivos puede informarnos más apropiadamente sobre las intervenciones en salud pública.A imunização, a intervenção da saúde pública mais bem sucedida até hoje, só pode ser eficaz se as pessoas elegíveis ou seus representantes legais tiverem acesso às vacinas e aderirem ao seu uso. A subvacinação pode resultar de várias causas: acesso, viabilidade, conscientização, aceitação e ativação. Neste trabalho, focamos na aceitação e, especificamente, nos concentramos nos fatores relativos à cooperação do indivíduo ou de seus pais, especificamente a psicologia do julgamento e da tomada de decisões. Descrevemos como as heurísticas e os vieses cognitivos - um aspecto dos pensamentos e sentimentos - afetam a tomada de decisão quanto à vacinação. Além disso, abordamos quando e como os processos sociais desempenham um papel e como as atitudes em relação às vacinas podem refletir uma atitude ou ideologia subjacente mais geral. A compreensão de como a tomada de decisões em relação às vacinas ocorre e o papel desempenhado pelas heurísticas e pelos vieses cognitivos pode ajudar a informar as intervenções de saúde pública de forma mais adequada.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2020-11-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524Reports in Public Health; Vol. 36 No. 14 (2020): Supplement 2Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 36 n. 14 (2020): Suplemento 21678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZengporhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16698https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16699https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16700https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16701Paula Mendes LuzPaulo NadanovskyJulie Leaskinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:30:01Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7524Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:08:39.476723Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions
Como as heurísticas e os vieses cognitivos afetam as decisões sobre vacinação
title How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions
spellingShingle How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions
Paula Mendes Luz
Vaccination
Cognition
Heuristics
Vacinação
Cognição
Heurística
title_short How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions
title_full How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions
title_fullStr How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions
title_full_unstemmed How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions
title_sort How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions
author Paula Mendes Luz
author_facet Paula Mendes Luz
Paulo Nadanovsky
Julie Leask
author_role author
author2 Paulo Nadanovsky
Julie Leask
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paula Mendes Luz
Paulo Nadanovsky
Julie Leask
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Vaccination
Cognition
Heuristics
Vacinação
Cognição
Heurística
topic Vaccination
Cognition
Heuristics
Vacinação
Cognição
Heurística
description Immunization, the most successful public health intervention to date, can only be effective if eligible individuals or their legal representatives have access to vaccines and subsequently comply with their use. Under-vaccination stems from multiple causes: access, affordability, awareness, acceptance and activation. In this paper, we focus on acceptance and, specifically, on factors pertaining to individual or parental compliance, specifically the psychology of judgment and decision making. We describe how heuristics and cognitive biases - a facet of thoughts and feelings - affect vaccination decision making. Additionally, we address when and how social processes play a role and how attitudes towards vaccines might reflect a more general underlying attitude or ideology. The understanding of how decision making, with regards to vaccines occurs, and the role played by heuristics and cognitive biases can help inform more appropriate public health interventions.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16698
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16699
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16700
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7524/16701
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
text/html
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 36 No. 14 (2020): Supplement 2
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 36 n. 14 (2020): Suplemento 2
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943393089323008