World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2017000605001 |
Resumo: | The article probes the origins and content of the Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors (FENSA) of the World Health Organization (WHO), approved on May 28, 2016, at the 69th World Health Assembly, which established different rules of collaboration to four categories of actors: nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), private sector entities, philanthropic foundations, and academic institutions. Applying the findings of International Legal Theory and based on extensive documentary research, we sought to determine whether FENSA is an appropriate accountability mechanism according to four functions of accountability: constitutional, democratic, epistemic, and populist. The article concludes that there is a risk of the prevalence of the populist function at the expense of the accountability potential that could result from the better use of the other three accountability functions. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-5_3e2f0d10c5c8bc59c922dcbbeff12bb7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-311X2017000605001 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-5 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actorsGlobal HealthLegal LiabilityInternational LawThe article probes the origins and content of the Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors (FENSA) of the World Health Organization (WHO), approved on May 28, 2016, at the 69th World Health Assembly, which established different rules of collaboration to four categories of actors: nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), private sector entities, philanthropic foundations, and academic institutions. Applying the findings of International Legal Theory and based on extensive documentary research, we sought to determine whether FENSA is an appropriate accountability mechanism according to four functions of accountability: constitutional, democratic, epistemic, and populist. The article concludes that there is a risk of the prevalence of the populist function at the expense of the accountability potential that could result from the better use of the other three accountability functions.Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2017000605001Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.33 n.6 2017reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZ10.1590/0102-311x00100716info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRached,Danielle HannaVentura,Deisy de Freitas Limaeng2017-06-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-311X2017000605001Revistahttp://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/csp/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2017-06-29T00:00Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
title |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
spellingShingle |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors Rached,Danielle Hanna Global Health Legal Liability International Law |
title_short |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
title_full |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
title_fullStr |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
title_full_unstemmed |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
title_sort |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
author |
Rached,Danielle Hanna |
author_facet |
Rached,Danielle Hanna Ventura,Deisy de Freitas Lima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ventura,Deisy de Freitas Lima |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rached,Danielle Hanna Ventura,Deisy de Freitas Lima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Global Health Legal Liability International Law |
topic |
Global Health Legal Liability International Law |
description |
The article probes the origins and content of the Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors (FENSA) of the World Health Organization (WHO), approved on May 28, 2016, at the 69th World Health Assembly, which established different rules of collaboration to four categories of actors: nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), private sector entities, philanthropic foundations, and academic institutions. Applying the findings of International Legal Theory and based on extensive documentary research, we sought to determine whether FENSA is an appropriate accountability mechanism according to four functions of accountability: constitutional, democratic, epistemic, and populist. The article concludes that there is a risk of the prevalence of the populist function at the expense of the accountability potential that could result from the better use of the other three accountability functions. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2017000605001 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2017000605001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0102-311x00100716 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.33 n.6 2017 reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1754115737576800256 |