World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552 |
Resumo: | The article probes the origins and content of the Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors (FENSA) of the World Health Organization (WHO), approved on May 28, 2016, at the 69th World Health Assembly, which established different rules of collaboration to four categories of actors: nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), private sector entities, philanthropic foundations, and academic institutions. Applying the findings of International Legal Theory and based on extensive documentary research, we sought to determine whether FENSA is an appropriate accountability mechanism according to four functions of accountability: constitutional, democratic, epistemic, and populist. The article concludes that there is a risk of the prevalence of the populist function at the expense of the accountability potential that could result from the better use of the other three accountability functions. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-5_8a57b329ef504887f376620e21250436 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/6552 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-5 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actorsGlobal HealthLegal LiabilityInternational LawThe article probes the origins and content of the Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors (FENSA) of the World Health Organization (WHO), approved on May 28, 2016, at the 69th World Health Assembly, which established different rules of collaboration to four categories of actors: nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), private sector entities, philanthropic foundations, and academic institutions. Applying the findings of International Legal Theory and based on extensive documentary research, we sought to determine whether FENSA is an appropriate accountability mechanism according to four functions of accountability: constitutional, democratic, epistemic, and populist. The article concludes that there is a risk of the prevalence of the populist function at the expense of the accountability potential that could result from the better use of the other three accountability functions.El artículo examina los orígenes y el contenido del Marco de Colaboración con Actores no Estatales (FENSA, en inglés) de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), aprobado el 28 de mayo de 2016 en la 69ª Asamblea Mundial de la Salud, que estableció diferentes reglas de colaboración para cuatro categorías de actores: organizaciones no gubernamentales (ONG), entidades del sector privado, fundaciones filantrópicas e instituciones académicas. Aplicando los hallazgos de la Teoría Legal Internacional y basándonos en una extensa investigación documental, buscamos determinar si FENSA es un mecanismo apropiado de rendición de cuentas según cuatro funciones de rendición de cuentas: constitucional, democrática, epistémica y populista. El artículo concluye que existe el riesgo de que la función populista se mantenga a expensas del potencial de rendición de cuentas que podría derivarse del mejor uso de las otras tres funciones de rendición de cuentas.O artigo investiga as origens e o conteúdo da Estrutura de Colaboração com Intervenientes Não Estatais (FENSA, em inglês) da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), aprovada em 28 de maio de 2016 pela 69ª Assembleia Mundial da Saúde, e que define regras distintas para quatro categorias de atores: organizações não governamentais (ONGs), entidades do setor privado, fundações filantrópicas e instituições acadêmicas. O estudo aplicou os achados da Teoria do Direito Internacional e recorreu a uma extensa pesquisa documental para determinar se a FENSA é um mecanismo apropriado de accountability de acordo com quatro funções de responsabilização: constitucional, democrática, epistêmica e populista. O artigo conclui que há um risco de prevalência da função populista com detrimento do potencial de accountability pelo uso melhor das outras três funções de accountability.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2017-07-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552Reports in Public Health; Vol. 33 No. 6 (2017): JuneCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 33 n. 6 (2017): Junho1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552/14044https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552/14045Danielle Hanna RachedDeisy de Freitas Lima Venturainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:29:23Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/6552Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:07:30.771468Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
title |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
spellingShingle |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors Danielle Hanna Rached Global Health Legal Liability International Law |
title_short |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
title_full |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
title_fullStr |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
title_full_unstemmed |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
title_sort |
World Health Organization and the search for accountability: a critical analysis of the new framework of engagement with non-state actors |
author |
Danielle Hanna Rached |
author_facet |
Danielle Hanna Rached Deisy de Freitas Lima Ventura |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Deisy de Freitas Lima Ventura |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Danielle Hanna Rached Deisy de Freitas Lima Ventura |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Global Health Legal Liability International Law |
topic |
Global Health Legal Liability International Law |
description |
The article probes the origins and content of the Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors (FENSA) of the World Health Organization (WHO), approved on May 28, 2016, at the 69th World Health Assembly, which established different rules of collaboration to four categories of actors: nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), private sector entities, philanthropic foundations, and academic institutions. Applying the findings of International Legal Theory and based on extensive documentary research, we sought to determine whether FENSA is an appropriate accountability mechanism according to four functions of accountability: constitutional, democratic, epistemic, and populist. The article concludes that there is a risk of the prevalence of the populist function at the expense of the accountability potential that could result from the better use of the other three accountability functions. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552 |
url |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552/14044 https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/6552/14045 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Reports in Public Health; Vol. 33 No. 6 (2017): June Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 33 n. 6 (2017): Junho 1678-4464 0102-311X reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798943384946081792 |