Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Priscila Santana Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Jéssica Levy, Eduardo De Carli, Isabela Judith Martins Bensenor, Paulo Andrade Lotufo, Rosangela Alves Pereira, Edna Massae Yokoo, Rosely Sichieri, Sandra Patricia Crispim, Dirce Maria Lobo Marchioni
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7890
Resumo: Existing methods for assessing food consumption are subject to measurement errors, especially the underreporting of energy intake, characterized by reporting energy intake below the minimum necessary to maintain body weight. This study aimed to compare the identification of energy intake underreporters using different predictive equations and instruments to collect dietary data. The study was conducted with 101 selected participants in the third wave of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) at the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo. For the dietary assessment, we applied a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), two 24-hour diet recall (24hR) using the GloboDiet software, and two 24hR using the Brasil-Nutri software. The energy intake underreport obtained from the FFQ was 13%, 16%, and 1% using the equations proposed by Goldberg et al. (1991), Black (2000), and McCrory et al. (2002), respectively. With these same equations, the 24hR described an underreport of 9.9%, 14.9%, and 0.9% respectively with the GloboDiet software and 14.7%, 15.8%, and 1.1% respectively with the Brasil-Nutri software. We verified a low prevalence of underreported energy intake among the three self-report-based dietary data collection methods (FFQ, 24hR with GloboDiet, and Brasil-Nutri). Though no statistically significant differences were found among three methods, the equations for each method differed among them. The agreement of energy intake between the methods was very similar, but the best was between GloboDiet and Brasil-Nutri.
id FIOCRUZ-5_8a1e89195d97fd102bf4ac78b83d62ec
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7890
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil studyDiet SurveysEnergy IntakeQuestionnaires and SurveysExisting methods for assessing food consumption are subject to measurement errors, especially the underreporting of energy intake, characterized by reporting energy intake below the minimum necessary to maintain body weight. This study aimed to compare the identification of energy intake underreporters using different predictive equations and instruments to collect dietary data. The study was conducted with 101 selected participants in the third wave of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) at the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo. For the dietary assessment, we applied a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), two 24-hour diet recall (24hR) using the GloboDiet software, and two 24hR using the Brasil-Nutri software. The energy intake underreport obtained from the FFQ was 13%, 16%, and 1% using the equations proposed by Goldberg et al. (1991), Black (2000), and McCrory et al. (2002), respectively. With these same equations, the 24hR described an underreport of 9.9%, 14.9%, and 0.9% respectively with the GloboDiet software and 14.7%, 15.8%, and 1.1% respectively with the Brasil-Nutri software. We verified a low prevalence of underreported energy intake among the three self-report-based dietary data collection methods (FFQ, 24hR with GloboDiet, and Brasil-Nutri). Though no statistically significant differences were found among three methods, the equations for each method differed among them. The agreement of energy intake between the methods was very similar, but the best was between GloboDiet and Brasil-Nutri.Los métodos existentes para evaluar el consumo de alimentos están sujetos a errores de medición, especialmente la infradeclaración de la ingesta de energía, caracterizada por la notificación de la ingesta de energía por debajo del mínimo necesario para mantener el peso corporal. El objetivo de este estudio era comparar la identificación de las infradeclaraciones de ingesta energética utilizando diferentes ecuaciones de predicción e instrumentos de recogida de datos dietéticos. El estudio se realizó con 101 participantes seleccionados en la tercera ola del Estudio Longitudinal de Salud del Adulto (ELSA-Brasil) en el Hospital Universitario de la Universidad de São Paulo. Para la evaluación de la dieta, se aplicó un cuestionario de frecuencia de alimentos (QFA), dos recordatorios de dieta de 24 horas (24hR) utilizando el software GloboDiet, y dos 24hR utilizando el software Brasil-Nutri. La infradeclaración de la ingesta energética obtenida del QFA fue del 13%, el 16% y el 1,0% utilizando las ecuaciones propuestas por Goldberg et al. (1991), Black (2000) y McCrory et al. (2002), respectivamente. Con estas mismas ecuaciones, el 24hR describió una infradeclaración del 9,9%, el 14,9% y el 0,9% respectivamente con el software GloboDiet y del 14,7%, el 15,8% y el 1,1% respectivamente con el software Brasil-Nutri. Se verificó una baja prevalencia de ingesta de energía subdeclarada entre los tres métodos de recogida de datos dietéticos basados en el autoinforme (QFA, 24hR con GloboDiet y Brasil-Nutri). Aunque no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los tres métodos, las ecuaciones de cada uno de ellos diferían entre sí. La concordancia de la ingesta de energía entre los métodos fue muy similar, pero la mejor fue entre GloboDiet y Brasil-Nutri.Os métodos existentes para avaliar consumo alimentar estão sujeitos a erros de medição, especialmente à subnotificação de ingestão calórica, que descreve a ingestão calórica abaixo do mínimo necessário para manter o peso corporal. Este estudo buscou comparar a identificação de subnotificações de ingestão calórica através de diferentes equações preditivas e instrumentos para coletar dados dietéticos. Este estudo foi realizado com 101 participantes selecionados na terceira onda do Estudo Longitudinal de Saúde do Adulto (ELSA-Brasil) do Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo. A partir da avaliação dietética, aplicamos um questionário de frequência alimentar (QFA), dois recordatórios de 24 horas (24hR) pelo software GloboDiet e dois 24hR utilizando o software Brasil-Nutri. A subnotificação de ingestão calórica obtida pelo QFA foi de 13%, 16% e 1%, utilizando-se as equações propostas por Goldberg et al. (1991), Black (2000) e McCrory et al. (2002), respectivamente. Com essas mesmas equações, o 24hR achou uma subnotificação de 9,9%, 14,9% e 0,9%, respectivamente, com o software GloboDiet e de 14,7%, 15,8% e 1,1%, respectivamente, com o software Brasil-Nutri. Verificou-se baixa prevalência de ingestão calórica subnotificada entre os três métodos de captação de dados dietéticos por autorrelato (FFQ e 24hR com GloboDiet e Brasil-Nutri). As equações para cada método diferem entre si embora não tenhamos encontrado diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os três métodos. A concordância de ingestão calórica entre os métodos foi muito semelhante, mas a melhor foi entre a GloboDiet e a Brasil-Nutri.Reports in Public HealthCadernos de Saúde Pública2022-07-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7890Reports in Public Health; Vol. 38 No. 7 (2022): JulyCadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 38 n. 7 (2022): Julho1678-44640102-311Xreponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7890/17656https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7890/17657Priscila Santana OliveiraJéssica LevyEduardo De CarliIsabela Judith Martins BensenorPaulo Andrade LotufoRosangela Alves PereiraEdna Massae YokooRosely SichieriSandra Patricia CrispimDirce Maria Lobo Marchioniinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:30:13Zoai:ojs.teste-cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br:article/7890Revistahttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csphttps://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/oaicadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2024-03-06T13:09:03.110081Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
title Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
spellingShingle Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
Priscila Santana Oliveira
Diet Surveys
Energy Intake
Questionnaires and Surveys
title_short Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
title_full Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
title_fullStr Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
title_sort Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
author Priscila Santana Oliveira
author_facet Priscila Santana Oliveira
Jéssica Levy
Eduardo De Carli
Isabela Judith Martins Bensenor
Paulo Andrade Lotufo
Rosangela Alves Pereira
Edna Massae Yokoo
Rosely Sichieri
Sandra Patricia Crispim
Dirce Maria Lobo Marchioni
author_role author
author2 Jéssica Levy
Eduardo De Carli
Isabela Judith Martins Bensenor
Paulo Andrade Lotufo
Rosangela Alves Pereira
Edna Massae Yokoo
Rosely Sichieri
Sandra Patricia Crispim
Dirce Maria Lobo Marchioni
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Priscila Santana Oliveira
Jéssica Levy
Eduardo De Carli
Isabela Judith Martins Bensenor
Paulo Andrade Lotufo
Rosangela Alves Pereira
Edna Massae Yokoo
Rosely Sichieri
Sandra Patricia Crispim
Dirce Maria Lobo Marchioni
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diet Surveys
Energy Intake
Questionnaires and Surveys
topic Diet Surveys
Energy Intake
Questionnaires and Surveys
description Existing methods for assessing food consumption are subject to measurement errors, especially the underreporting of energy intake, characterized by reporting energy intake below the minimum necessary to maintain body weight. This study aimed to compare the identification of energy intake underreporters using different predictive equations and instruments to collect dietary data. The study was conducted with 101 selected participants in the third wave of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) at the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo. For the dietary assessment, we applied a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), two 24-hour diet recall (24hR) using the GloboDiet software, and two 24hR using the Brasil-Nutri software. The energy intake underreport obtained from the FFQ was 13%, 16%, and 1% using the equations proposed by Goldberg et al. (1991), Black (2000), and McCrory et al. (2002), respectively. With these same equations, the 24hR described an underreport of 9.9%, 14.9%, and 0.9% respectively with the GloboDiet software and 14.7%, 15.8%, and 1.1% respectively with the Brasil-Nutri software. We verified a low prevalence of underreported energy intake among the three self-report-based dietary data collection methods (FFQ, 24hR with GloboDiet, and Brasil-Nutri). Though no statistically significant differences were found among three methods, the equations for each method differed among them. The agreement of energy intake between the methods was very similar, but the best was between GloboDiet and Brasil-Nutri.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7890
url https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7890
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7890/17656
https://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/ojs/index.php/csp/article/view/7890/17657
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Reports in Public Health; Vol. 38 No. 7 (2022): July
Cadernos de Saúde Pública; v. 38 n. 7 (2022): Julho
1678-4464
0102-311X
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1798943395764240384