Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira,Priscila Santana
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Levy,Jéssica, Carli,Eduardo De, Bensenor,Isabela Judith Martins, Lotufo,Paulo Andrade, Pereira,Rosangela Alves, Yokoo,Edna Massae, Sichieri,Rosely, Crispim,Sandra Patricia, Marchioni,Dirce Maria Lobo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022000705004
Resumo: Existing methods for assessing food consumption are subject to measurement errors, especially the underreporting of energy intake, characterized by reporting energy intake below the minimum necessary to maintain body weight. This study aimed to compare the identification of energy intake underreporters using different predictive equations and instruments to collect dietary data. The study was conducted with 101 selected participants in the third wave of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) at the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo. For the dietary assessment, we applied a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), two 24-hour diet recall (24hR) using the GloboDiet software, and two 24hR using the Brasil-Nutri software. The energy intake underreport obtained from the FFQ was 13%, 16%, and 1% using the equations proposed by Goldberg et al. (1991), Black (2000), and McCrory et al. (2002), respectively. With these same equations, the 24hR described an underreport of 9.9%, 14.9%, and 0.9% respectively with the GloboDiet software and 14.7%, 15.8%, and 1.1% respectively with the Brasil-Nutri software. We verified a low prevalence of underreported energy intake among the three self-report-based dietary data collection methods (FFQ, 24hR with GloboDiet, and Brasil-Nutri). Though no statistically significant differences were found among three methods, the equations for each method differed among them. The agreement of energy intake between the methods was very similar, but the best was between GloboDiet and Brasil-Nutri.
id FIOCRUZ-5_f4b8a5c53e794befd41c287462ae02bf
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-311X2022000705004
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-5
network_name_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil studyDiet SurveysEnergy IntakeQuestionnaires and SurveysExisting methods for assessing food consumption are subject to measurement errors, especially the underreporting of energy intake, characterized by reporting energy intake below the minimum necessary to maintain body weight. This study aimed to compare the identification of energy intake underreporters using different predictive equations and instruments to collect dietary data. The study was conducted with 101 selected participants in the third wave of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) at the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo. For the dietary assessment, we applied a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), two 24-hour diet recall (24hR) using the GloboDiet software, and two 24hR using the Brasil-Nutri software. The energy intake underreport obtained from the FFQ was 13%, 16%, and 1% using the equations proposed by Goldberg et al. (1991), Black (2000), and McCrory et al. (2002), respectively. With these same equations, the 24hR described an underreport of 9.9%, 14.9%, and 0.9% respectively with the GloboDiet software and 14.7%, 15.8%, and 1.1% respectively with the Brasil-Nutri software. We verified a low prevalence of underreported energy intake among the three self-report-based dietary data collection methods (FFQ, 24hR with GloboDiet, and Brasil-Nutri). Though no statistically significant differences were found among three methods, the equations for each method differed among them. The agreement of energy intake between the methods was very similar, but the best was between GloboDiet and Brasil-Nutri.Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022000705004Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.38 n.7 2022reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZ10.1590/0102-311xen249821info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Priscila SantanaLevy,JéssicaCarli,Eduardo DeBensenor,Isabela Judith MartinsLotufo,Paulo AndradePereira,Rosangela AlvesYokoo,Edna MassaeSichieri,RoselyCrispim,Sandra PatriciaMarchioni,Dirce Maria Loboeng2022-07-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-311X2022000705004Revistahttp://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/csp/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2022-07-22T00:00Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
title Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
spellingShingle Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
Oliveira,Priscila Santana
Diet Surveys
Energy Intake
Questionnaires and Surveys
title_short Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
title_full Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
title_fullStr Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
title_sort Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
author Oliveira,Priscila Santana
author_facet Oliveira,Priscila Santana
Levy,Jéssica
Carli,Eduardo De
Bensenor,Isabela Judith Martins
Lotufo,Paulo Andrade
Pereira,Rosangela Alves
Yokoo,Edna Massae
Sichieri,Rosely
Crispim,Sandra Patricia
Marchioni,Dirce Maria Lobo
author_role author
author2 Levy,Jéssica
Carli,Eduardo De
Bensenor,Isabela Judith Martins
Lotufo,Paulo Andrade
Pereira,Rosangela Alves
Yokoo,Edna Massae
Sichieri,Rosely
Crispim,Sandra Patricia
Marchioni,Dirce Maria Lobo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira,Priscila Santana
Levy,Jéssica
Carli,Eduardo De
Bensenor,Isabela Judith Martins
Lotufo,Paulo Andrade
Pereira,Rosangela Alves
Yokoo,Edna Massae
Sichieri,Rosely
Crispim,Sandra Patricia
Marchioni,Dirce Maria Lobo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diet Surveys
Energy Intake
Questionnaires and Surveys
topic Diet Surveys
Energy Intake
Questionnaires and Surveys
description Existing methods for assessing food consumption are subject to measurement errors, especially the underreporting of energy intake, characterized by reporting energy intake below the minimum necessary to maintain body weight. This study aimed to compare the identification of energy intake underreporters using different predictive equations and instruments to collect dietary data. The study was conducted with 101 selected participants in the third wave of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) at the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo. For the dietary assessment, we applied a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), two 24-hour diet recall (24hR) using the GloboDiet software, and two 24hR using the Brasil-Nutri software. The energy intake underreport obtained from the FFQ was 13%, 16%, and 1% using the equations proposed by Goldberg et al. (1991), Black (2000), and McCrory et al. (2002), respectively. With these same equations, the 24hR described an underreport of 9.9%, 14.9%, and 0.9% respectively with the GloboDiet software and 14.7%, 15.8%, and 1.1% respectively with the Brasil-Nutri software. We verified a low prevalence of underreported energy intake among the three self-report-based dietary data collection methods (FFQ, 24hR with GloboDiet, and Brasil-Nutri). Though no statistically significant differences were found among three methods, the equations for each method differed among them. The agreement of energy intake between the methods was very similar, but the best was between GloboDiet and Brasil-Nutri.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022000705004
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022000705004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0102-311xen249821
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.38 n.7 2022
reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Cadernos de Saúde Pública
collection Cadernos de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br
_version_ 1754115743501254656