Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022000705004 |
Resumo: | Existing methods for assessing food consumption are subject to measurement errors, especially the underreporting of energy intake, characterized by reporting energy intake below the minimum necessary to maintain body weight. This study aimed to compare the identification of energy intake underreporters using different predictive equations and instruments to collect dietary data. The study was conducted with 101 selected participants in the third wave of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) at the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo. For the dietary assessment, we applied a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), two 24-hour diet recall (24hR) using the GloboDiet software, and two 24hR using the Brasil-Nutri software. The energy intake underreport obtained from the FFQ was 13%, 16%, and 1% using the equations proposed by Goldberg et al. (1991), Black (2000), and McCrory et al. (2002), respectively. With these same equations, the 24hR described an underreport of 9.9%, 14.9%, and 0.9% respectively with the GloboDiet software and 14.7%, 15.8%, and 1.1% respectively with the Brasil-Nutri software. We verified a low prevalence of underreported energy intake among the three self-report-based dietary data collection methods (FFQ, 24hR with GloboDiet, and Brasil-Nutri). Though no statistically significant differences were found among three methods, the equations for each method differed among them. The agreement of energy intake between the methods was very similar, but the best was between GloboDiet and Brasil-Nutri. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-5_f4b8a5c53e794befd41c287462ae02bf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-311X2022000705004 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-5 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil studyDiet SurveysEnergy IntakeQuestionnaires and SurveysExisting methods for assessing food consumption are subject to measurement errors, especially the underreporting of energy intake, characterized by reporting energy intake below the minimum necessary to maintain body weight. This study aimed to compare the identification of energy intake underreporters using different predictive equations and instruments to collect dietary data. The study was conducted with 101 selected participants in the third wave of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) at the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo. For the dietary assessment, we applied a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), two 24-hour diet recall (24hR) using the GloboDiet software, and two 24hR using the Brasil-Nutri software. The energy intake underreport obtained from the FFQ was 13%, 16%, and 1% using the equations proposed by Goldberg et al. (1991), Black (2000), and McCrory et al. (2002), respectively. With these same equations, the 24hR described an underreport of 9.9%, 14.9%, and 0.9% respectively with the GloboDiet software and 14.7%, 15.8%, and 1.1% respectively with the Brasil-Nutri software. We verified a low prevalence of underreported energy intake among the three self-report-based dietary data collection methods (FFQ, 24hR with GloboDiet, and Brasil-Nutri). Though no statistically significant differences were found among three methods, the equations for each method differed among them. The agreement of energy intake between the methods was very similar, but the best was between GloboDiet and Brasil-Nutri.Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022000705004Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.38 n.7 2022reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Públicainstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZ10.1590/0102-311xen249821info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Priscila SantanaLevy,JéssicaCarli,Eduardo DeBensenor,Isabela Judith MartinsLotufo,Paulo AndradePereira,Rosangela AlvesYokoo,Edna MassaeSichieri,RoselyCrispim,Sandra PatriciaMarchioni,Dirce Maria Loboeng2022-07-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-311X2022000705004Revistahttp://cadernos.ensp.fiocruz.br/csp/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br1678-44640102-311Xopendoar:2022-07-22T00:00Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study |
title |
Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study |
spellingShingle |
Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study Oliveira,Priscila Santana Diet Surveys Energy Intake Questionnaires and Surveys |
title_short |
Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study |
title_full |
Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study |
title_fullStr |
Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study |
title_sort |
Estimation of underreporting of energy intake using different methods in a subsample of the ELSA-Brasil study |
author |
Oliveira,Priscila Santana |
author_facet |
Oliveira,Priscila Santana Levy,Jéssica Carli,Eduardo De Bensenor,Isabela Judith Martins Lotufo,Paulo Andrade Pereira,Rosangela Alves Yokoo,Edna Massae Sichieri,Rosely Crispim,Sandra Patricia Marchioni,Dirce Maria Lobo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Levy,Jéssica Carli,Eduardo De Bensenor,Isabela Judith Martins Lotufo,Paulo Andrade Pereira,Rosangela Alves Yokoo,Edna Massae Sichieri,Rosely Crispim,Sandra Patricia Marchioni,Dirce Maria Lobo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira,Priscila Santana Levy,Jéssica Carli,Eduardo De Bensenor,Isabela Judith Martins Lotufo,Paulo Andrade Pereira,Rosangela Alves Yokoo,Edna Massae Sichieri,Rosely Crispim,Sandra Patricia Marchioni,Dirce Maria Lobo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Diet Surveys Energy Intake Questionnaires and Surveys |
topic |
Diet Surveys Energy Intake Questionnaires and Surveys |
description |
Existing methods for assessing food consumption are subject to measurement errors, especially the underreporting of energy intake, characterized by reporting energy intake below the minimum necessary to maintain body weight. This study aimed to compare the identification of energy intake underreporters using different predictive equations and instruments to collect dietary data. The study was conducted with 101 selected participants in the third wave of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) at the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo. For the dietary assessment, we applied a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), two 24-hour diet recall (24hR) using the GloboDiet software, and two 24hR using the Brasil-Nutri software. The energy intake underreport obtained from the FFQ was 13%, 16%, and 1% using the equations proposed by Goldberg et al. (1991), Black (2000), and McCrory et al. (2002), respectively. With these same equations, the 24hR described an underreport of 9.9%, 14.9%, and 0.9% respectively with the GloboDiet software and 14.7%, 15.8%, and 1.1% respectively with the Brasil-Nutri software. We verified a low prevalence of underreported energy intake among the three self-report-based dietary data collection methods (FFQ, 24hR with GloboDiet, and Brasil-Nutri). Though no statistically significant differences were found among three methods, the equations for each method differed among them. The agreement of energy intake between the methods was very similar, but the best was between GloboDiet and Brasil-Nutri. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022000705004 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2022000705004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0102-311xen249821 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública v.38 n.7 2022 reponame:Cadernos de Saúde Pública instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br||cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1754115743501254656 |