Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary culture
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | RECIIS (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/916 |
Resumo: | The research reported here aims at mapping the “cerebral subject” in contemporary society. The term “cerebral subject” refers to an anthropological figure that embodies the belief that human beings are essentially reducible to their brains. Our focus is on the discourses, images and practices that might globally be designated as “neuroculture.” From public policy to the arts, from the neurosciences to theology, humans are often treated as reducible to their brains. The new discipline of neuroethics is eminently symptomatic of such a situation; other examples can be drawn from science fiction in writing and film; from practices such as “neurobics” or cerebral cryopreservation; from neurophilosophy and the neurosciences; from debates about brain life and brain death; from practices of intensive care, organ transplantation, and neurological enhancement and prosthetics; from the emerging fields of neuroesthetics, neurotheology, neuroeconomics, neuroeducation, neuropsychoanalysis and others. This research in progress traces the diversity of neurocultures, and places them in a larger context characterized by the emergence of somatic “bioidentities” that replace psychological and internalistic notions of personhood. It does so by examining not only discourses and representations, but also concrete social practices, such as those that take shape in the politically powerful “neurodiversity” movement, or in vigorously commercialized “neuroascetic” disciplines of the self. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-6_fca6041354d26402e164a508e6bf8a73 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br:article/916 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-6 |
network_name_str |
RECIIS (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary cultureMapeamento do sujeito cerebral na cultura contemporâneaBrainhoodcerebral subjectbiosocialitybrain imageryneurocultureCerebralidadesujeito cerebralbiossociabilidadeimagem cerebralneuroculturaThe research reported here aims at mapping the “cerebral subject” in contemporary society. The term “cerebral subject” refers to an anthropological figure that embodies the belief that human beings are essentially reducible to their brains. Our focus is on the discourses, images and practices that might globally be designated as “neuroculture.” From public policy to the arts, from the neurosciences to theology, humans are often treated as reducible to their brains. The new discipline of neuroethics is eminently symptomatic of such a situation; other examples can be drawn from science fiction in writing and film; from practices such as “neurobics” or cerebral cryopreservation; from neurophilosophy and the neurosciences; from debates about brain life and brain death; from practices of intensive care, organ transplantation, and neurological enhancement and prosthetics; from the emerging fields of neuroesthetics, neurotheology, neuroeconomics, neuroeducation, neuropsychoanalysis and others. This research in progress traces the diversity of neurocultures, and places them in a larger context characterized by the emergence of somatic “bioidentities” that replace psychological and internalistic notions of personhood. It does so by examining not only discourses and representations, but also concrete social practices, such as those that take shape in the politically powerful “neurodiversity” movement, or in vigorously commercialized “neuroascetic” disciplines of the self.mos de “sujeito cerebral” a figura antropológica que incorpora a crença de que os seres humanos são essencialmente reduzíveis aos seus cérebros. Nosso foco está nos discursos, nas imagens e nas práticas que podem ser globalmente designadas de “neurocultura”. Das políticas públicas às artes, das neurociências à teologia, os humanos são geralmente tratados como reduzíveis a seus cérebros. A nova disciplina da neuroética é eminentemente sintomática dessa situação; outros exemplos podem ser tirados da ficção científica escrita e em filmes; de práticas como a “neuróbica” ou criopreservação cerebral; da neurofilosofia e das neurociências; de debates a respeito da vida e da morte cerebral; de práticas de tratamento intensivo, transplante de órgãos, e aprimoramentos e próteses neurológicas; das áreas emergentes da neuroestética, neuroteologia, neuroeconomia, neuroeducação, neuropsicanálise e outras. Este artigo traça a diversidade de neuroculturas e as coloca num contexto maior, caracterizado pela emergência de “bioidentidades” somáticas que substituem noções psicológicas e internalistas de identidade individual. Tal objetivo foi alcançado não somente através do exame de discursos e representações, mas também de práticas sociais concretas, como aquelas que se formam no movimento politicamente poderoso da “neurodiversidade”, ou em disciplinas “neuroascéticas” do self, vigorosamente comercializadas.Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz)2007-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/91610.3395/reciis.v1i2.916Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2007)Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2007)Revue de la Communication, de l'Information et de l'Innovation en santé; Vol. 1 No 2 (2007)Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; v. 1 n. 2 (2007)1981-6278reponame:RECIIS (Online)instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/916/1560https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/916/1634Ortega, Francisco Javier GuerreroVidal, Fernandoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-08-11T14:24:57Zoai:www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br:article/916Revistahttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciishttps://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/oaireciis@icict.fiocruz.br1981-62781981-6278opendoar:2022-08-11T14:24:57RECIIS (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary culture Mapeamento do sujeito cerebral na cultura contemporânea |
title |
Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary culture |
spellingShingle |
Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary culture Ortega, Francisco Javier Guerrero Brainhood cerebral subject biosociality brain imagery neuroculture Cerebralidade sujeito cerebral biossociabilidade imagem cerebral neurocultura |
title_short |
Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary culture |
title_full |
Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary culture |
title_fullStr |
Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary culture |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary culture |
title_sort |
Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary culture |
author |
Ortega, Francisco Javier Guerrero |
author_facet |
Ortega, Francisco Javier Guerrero Vidal, Fernando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vidal, Fernando |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ortega, Francisco Javier Guerrero Vidal, Fernando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brainhood cerebral subject biosociality brain imagery neuroculture Cerebralidade sujeito cerebral biossociabilidade imagem cerebral neurocultura |
topic |
Brainhood cerebral subject biosociality brain imagery neuroculture Cerebralidade sujeito cerebral biossociabilidade imagem cerebral neurocultura |
description |
The research reported here aims at mapping the “cerebral subject” in contemporary society. The term “cerebral subject” refers to an anthropological figure that embodies the belief that human beings are essentially reducible to their brains. Our focus is on the discourses, images and practices that might globally be designated as “neuroculture.” From public policy to the arts, from the neurosciences to theology, humans are often treated as reducible to their brains. The new discipline of neuroethics is eminently symptomatic of such a situation; other examples can be drawn from science fiction in writing and film; from practices such as “neurobics” or cerebral cryopreservation; from neurophilosophy and the neurosciences; from debates about brain life and brain death; from practices of intensive care, organ transplantation, and neurological enhancement and prosthetics; from the emerging fields of neuroesthetics, neurotheology, neuroeconomics, neuroeducation, neuropsychoanalysis and others. This research in progress traces the diversity of neurocultures, and places them in a larger context characterized by the emergence of somatic “bioidentities” that replace psychological and internalistic notions of personhood. It does so by examining not only discourses and representations, but also concrete social practices, such as those that take shape in the politically powerful “neurodiversity” movement, or in vigorously commercialized “neuroascetic” disciplines of the self. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-10-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/916 10.3395/reciis.v1i2.916 |
url |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/916 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3395/reciis.v1i2.916 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/916/1560 https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/916/1634 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict/Fiocruz) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2007) Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2007) Revue de la Communication, de l'Information et de l'Innovation en santé; Vol. 1 No 2 (2007) Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde; v. 1 n. 2 (2007) 1981-6278 reponame:RECIIS (Online) instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
RECIIS (Online) |
collection |
RECIIS (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RECIIS (Online) - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reciis@icict.fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1798942464108658688 |