Fraud in olive oils of Brazilian market: evaluation by fatty acid profile, difference of ECN 42 and quality parameters
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/983 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Considering the high incidence of adulterations in olive oil marketed in Brazil, a continuous monitoring of this product is fundamental. Objective: In the present study, 41 samples from 18 brands were evaluated, of which 26 were declared as extra virgin olive oil (AOEV) and 15 as olive oil (AO). Method: The samples were analyzed at Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, Brazil, between 2014 and 2016. Fatty acids profile, acidity and peroxides indexes, specific extinction at 270 nm, ECN 42 difference, tocopherols profile and adequacy of nutritional information were determined. Results: Nineteen samples (46%), of 12 brands, did not present a characteristic fatty acid profile. The ECN 42 difference was sensitive to indicate the adulteration of two other samples whose fatty acid profile was of authentic olive oil. Of the 26 samples declared as AOEV, only 9 were in this category. Twenty-two samples had a monounsaturated fatty acid content (AGM) and / or polyunsaturated fatty acid content (AGP), varying more than 20% of that declared on the label. Conclusions: The adulterated samples were bottled in Brazil, evidencing the need for a more rigorous control in the production and commercialization of the product aiming at the nutritional safety of this food. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_1a072f3e409a37637b84f97f28d38304 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/983 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Fraud in olive oils of Brazilian market: evaluation by fatty acid profile, difference of ECN 42 and quality parametersFraude em azeites de oliva do comércio brasileiro: avaliação pelo perfil de ácidos graxos, diferença do ECN 42 e parâmetros de qualidadeOlive OilAdulterationLegislationHealth SurveillanceAzeite de OlivaAdulteraçãoLegislaçãoVigilância SanitáriaIntroduction: Considering the high incidence of adulterations in olive oil marketed in Brazil, a continuous monitoring of this product is fundamental. Objective: In the present study, 41 samples from 18 brands were evaluated, of which 26 were declared as extra virgin olive oil (AOEV) and 15 as olive oil (AO). Method: The samples were analyzed at Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, Brazil, between 2014 and 2016. Fatty acids profile, acidity and peroxides indexes, specific extinction at 270 nm, ECN 42 difference, tocopherols profile and adequacy of nutritional information were determined. Results: Nineteen samples (46%), of 12 brands, did not present a characteristic fatty acid profile. The ECN 42 difference was sensitive to indicate the adulteration of two other samples whose fatty acid profile was of authentic olive oil. Of the 26 samples declared as AOEV, only 9 were in this category. Twenty-two samples had a monounsaturated fatty acid content (AGM) and / or polyunsaturated fatty acid content (AGP), varying more than 20% of that declared on the label. Conclusions: The adulterated samples were bottled in Brazil, evidencing the need for a more rigorous control in the production and commercialization of the product aiming at the nutritional safety of this food.Introdução: Considerando a alta incidência de adulterações no azeite de oliva comercializado no Brasil, é fundamental o monitoramento contínuo deste produto. Objetivo: No presente estudo foram avaliadas 41 amostras de 18 marcas, sendo 26 declaradas como azeite de oliva extra virgem (AOEV) e 15 como azeite de oliva (AO). Método: As amostras foram analisadas no Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brasil, entre os anos de 2014 e 2016. Foram determinados: o perfil de ácidos graxos, os índices de acidez e peróxidos a extinção específica a 270 nm, a diferença do ECN 42, o perfil de tocoferóis e a adequação da informação nutricional. Resultados: Dezenove amostras (46%), de 12 marcas, não apresentaram perfil de ácidos graxos característico. A diferença do ECN 42 mostrou-se sensível para indicar a adulteração de outras duas amostras cujo perfil de ácidos graxos era de azeite autêntico. Das 26 amostras declaradas como AOEV, somente 9 enquadraram-se nesta categoria. Vinte e duas amostras apresentaram teor de ácidos graxos monoinsaturados (AGM) e/ou poli-insaturados (AGP) variando mais que 20% do declarado no rótulo. Conclusões: As amostras adulteradas foram envasadas no Brasil, evidenciando a necessidade de um controle mais rigoroso na produção e na comercialização do produto com vistas à segurança nutricional deste alimento.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2017-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Editor de seção"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/98310.22239/2317-269X.00983Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 5 No. 3 (2017): August; 84-91Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 5 Núm. 3 (2017): Agosto; 84-91Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 5 n. 3 (2017): Agosto; 84-912317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/983/406https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/983/563Copyright (c) 2017 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAued-Pimentel, SabriaSeparovic, LucianaSilvestre, Leilane Gorga Gaspar RuasKus-Yamashita, Mahyara Markievics MancioTakemoto, Emy2021-09-30T19:23:06Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/983Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2021-09-30T19:23:06Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Fraud in olive oils of Brazilian market: evaluation by fatty acid profile, difference of ECN 42 and quality parameters Fraude em azeites de oliva do comércio brasileiro: avaliação pelo perfil de ácidos graxos, diferença do ECN 42 e parâmetros de qualidade |
title |
Fraud in olive oils of Brazilian market: evaluation by fatty acid profile, difference of ECN 42 and quality parameters |
spellingShingle |
Fraud in olive oils of Brazilian market: evaluation by fatty acid profile, difference of ECN 42 and quality parameters Aued-Pimentel, Sabria Olive Oil Adulteration Legislation Health Surveillance Azeite de Oliva Adulteração Legislação Vigilância Sanitária |
title_short |
Fraud in olive oils of Brazilian market: evaluation by fatty acid profile, difference of ECN 42 and quality parameters |
title_full |
Fraud in olive oils of Brazilian market: evaluation by fatty acid profile, difference of ECN 42 and quality parameters |
title_fullStr |
Fraud in olive oils of Brazilian market: evaluation by fatty acid profile, difference of ECN 42 and quality parameters |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fraud in olive oils of Brazilian market: evaluation by fatty acid profile, difference of ECN 42 and quality parameters |
title_sort |
Fraud in olive oils of Brazilian market: evaluation by fatty acid profile, difference of ECN 42 and quality parameters |
author |
Aued-Pimentel, Sabria |
author_facet |
Aued-Pimentel, Sabria Separovic, Luciana Silvestre, Leilane Gorga Gaspar Ruas Kus-Yamashita, Mahyara Markievics Mancio Takemoto, Emy |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Separovic, Luciana Silvestre, Leilane Gorga Gaspar Ruas Kus-Yamashita, Mahyara Markievics Mancio Takemoto, Emy |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aued-Pimentel, Sabria Separovic, Luciana Silvestre, Leilane Gorga Gaspar Ruas Kus-Yamashita, Mahyara Markievics Mancio Takemoto, Emy |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Olive Oil Adulteration Legislation Health Surveillance Azeite de Oliva Adulteração Legislação Vigilância Sanitária |
topic |
Olive Oil Adulteration Legislation Health Surveillance Azeite de Oliva Adulteração Legislação Vigilância Sanitária |
description |
Introduction: Considering the high incidence of adulterations in olive oil marketed in Brazil, a continuous monitoring of this product is fundamental. Objective: In the present study, 41 samples from 18 brands were evaluated, of which 26 were declared as extra virgin olive oil (AOEV) and 15 as olive oil (AO). Method: The samples were analyzed at Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, Brazil, between 2014 and 2016. Fatty acids profile, acidity and peroxides indexes, specific extinction at 270 nm, ECN 42 difference, tocopherols profile and adequacy of nutritional information were determined. Results: Nineteen samples (46%), of 12 brands, did not present a characteristic fatty acid profile. The ECN 42 difference was sensitive to indicate the adulteration of two other samples whose fatty acid profile was of authentic olive oil. Of the 26 samples declared as AOEV, only 9 were in this category. Twenty-two samples had a monounsaturated fatty acid content (AGM) and / or polyunsaturated fatty acid content (AGP), varying more than 20% of that declared on the label. Conclusions: The adulterated samples were bottled in Brazil, evidencing the need for a more rigorous control in the production and commercialization of the product aiming at the nutritional safety of this food. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Editor de seção" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/983 10.22239/2317-269X.00983 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/983 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.00983 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/983/406 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/983/563 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 5 No. 3 (2017): August; 84-91 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 5 Núm. 3 (2017): Agosto; 84-91 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 5 n. 3 (2017): Agosto; 84-91 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042047447728128 |