Evaluation of fluorescence detection technique as an alternative for heterotrophic bacteria count in hemodialysis water

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hilinski, Ellen Gameiro
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Bugno, Adriana, Silva, Fernando Pontes de Lima e, Almodovar, Adriana Aparecida Buzzo, Pinto, Terezinha de Jesus Andreoli
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1387
Resumo: Introduction: The microbiological quality of hemodialysis treated water is directly related to the occurrence of infections and pyrogenic reactions in patients. Objective: Determine the minimum incubation time and evaluate the alternative microbiological method performance for heterotrophic bacteria count in hemodialysis water through the fluorescence microbial detection technique. Method: The analyses were conducted by concentration levels of 2,5 x 10-1 to 1,0 x 102 CFU/plate for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The tests were performed simultaneously by the alternative and the traditional methods, using culture medium R2A and incubation temperature of 24.0°C ± 4.0°C. The incubation times were 40 h and 120 h, respectively. Fourteen hemodialysis water samples were analyzed to assess the equivalence between the methods evaluated. Results: The results demonstrated that the alternative method allows quantification of heterotrophic bacteria after 40 h of incubation, with accuracy, precision, specificity and linearity for the range of 5 to 100 CFU/plate. The detection limit of the alternative method is 1 CFU/plate. Conclusions: It was possible to conclude that the alternative method has equivalent results to the traditional method, since the confidence interval of the alternative method was entirely within the equivalence range. Therefore, the microbial detection technique by fluorescence showed a viable option for the implementation of a rapid microbiological method for the heterotrophic bacteria count in samples of treated water for hemodialysis.
id FIOCRUZ-9_28d80ad47e7999fee01a2d7c02d5da90
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1387
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of fluorescence detection technique as an alternative for heterotrophic bacteria count in hemodialysis waterAvaliação da técnica de detecção por fluorescência como alternativa para contagem de bactérias heterotróficas em água para hemodiáliseHemodialysisTreated WaterHeterotrophic BacteriaFluorescenceHemodiáliseÁgua TratadaBactérias HeterotróficasFluorescênciaIntroduction: The microbiological quality of hemodialysis treated water is directly related to the occurrence of infections and pyrogenic reactions in patients. Objective: Determine the minimum incubation time and evaluate the alternative microbiological method performance for heterotrophic bacteria count in hemodialysis water through the fluorescence microbial detection technique. Method: The analyses were conducted by concentration levels of 2,5 x 10-1 to 1,0 x 102 CFU/plate for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The tests were performed simultaneously by the alternative and the traditional methods, using culture medium R2A and incubation temperature of 24.0°C ± 4.0°C. The incubation times were 40 h and 120 h, respectively. Fourteen hemodialysis water samples were analyzed to assess the equivalence between the methods evaluated. Results: The results demonstrated that the alternative method allows quantification of heterotrophic bacteria after 40 h of incubation, with accuracy, precision, specificity and linearity for the range of 5 to 100 CFU/plate. The detection limit of the alternative method is 1 CFU/plate. Conclusions: It was possible to conclude that the alternative method has equivalent results to the traditional method, since the confidence interval of the alternative method was entirely within the equivalence range. Therefore, the microbial detection technique by fluorescence showed a viable option for the implementation of a rapid microbiological method for the heterotrophic bacteria count in samples of treated water for hemodialysis.Introdução: A qualidade microbiológica da água tratada para hemodiálise está diretamente relacionada à ocorrência de infecções e de reações pirogênicas nos pacientes. Objetivo: Determinar o tempo de incubação mínimo e avaliar o desempenho do método microbiológico alternativo para a contagem de bactérias heterotróficas em água de hemodiálise por meio da técnica de detecção microbiana por fluorescência. Método: As análises foram conduzidas com níveis de concentração entre 2,5 x 10-1 e 1,0 x 102 UFC/placa para Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia, Escherichia coli e Staphylococcus aureus. Os testes foram realizados simultaneamente pelos métodos alternativo e tradicional, utilizando o meio de cultura R2A e temperatura de incubação de 24,0°C ± 4,0°C. Os tempos de incubação empregados foram os de 40 h e 120 h, respectivamente. Quatorze amostras de água para hemodiálise foram analisadas para avaliação da equivalência entre os métodos avaliados. Resultados: Os resultados demonstraram que o método alternativo permite a quantificação de bactérias heterotróficas após 40 h de incubação, com precisão, exatidão, especificidade e linearidade para a faixa de 5 a 100 UFC/placa. O limite de detecção do método alternativo é 1 UFC/placa. Conclusões: O método alternativo possui resultados equivalentes ao método tradicional, uma vez que o intervalo de confiança do método alternativo obtido esteve compreendido inteiramente dentro da faixa de equivalência. Portanto, a técnica de detecção microbiana por fluorescência mostrou ser uma opção viável para a implementação de um método microbiológico rápido para a contagem de bactérias heterotróficas em amostras de água tratada para hemodiálise.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2020-10-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/138710.22239/2317-269X.01387Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): May; 94-105Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2020): Puede; 94-105Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 8 n. 2 (2020): Maio; 94-1052317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1387/1220https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1387/1221Copyright (c) 2020 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHilinski, Ellen GameiroBugno, AdrianaSilva, Fernando Pontes de Lima eAlmodovar, Adriana Aparecida BuzzoPinto, Terezinha de Jesus Andreoli2023-06-27T15:12:27Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1387Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:12:27Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of fluorescence detection technique as an alternative for heterotrophic bacteria count in hemodialysis water
Avaliação da técnica de detecção por fluorescência como alternativa para contagem de bactérias heterotróficas em água para hemodiálise
title Evaluation of fluorescence detection technique as an alternative for heterotrophic bacteria count in hemodialysis water
spellingShingle Evaluation of fluorescence detection technique as an alternative for heterotrophic bacteria count in hemodialysis water
Hilinski, Ellen Gameiro
Hemodialysis
Treated Water
Heterotrophic Bacteria
Fluorescence
Hemodiálise
Água Tratada
Bactérias Heterotróficas
Fluorescência
title_short Evaluation of fluorescence detection technique as an alternative for heterotrophic bacteria count in hemodialysis water
title_full Evaluation of fluorescence detection technique as an alternative for heterotrophic bacteria count in hemodialysis water
title_fullStr Evaluation of fluorescence detection technique as an alternative for heterotrophic bacteria count in hemodialysis water
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of fluorescence detection technique as an alternative for heterotrophic bacteria count in hemodialysis water
title_sort Evaluation of fluorescence detection technique as an alternative for heterotrophic bacteria count in hemodialysis water
author Hilinski, Ellen Gameiro
author_facet Hilinski, Ellen Gameiro
Bugno, Adriana
Silva, Fernando Pontes de Lima e
Almodovar, Adriana Aparecida Buzzo
Pinto, Terezinha de Jesus Andreoli
author_role author
author2 Bugno, Adriana
Silva, Fernando Pontes de Lima e
Almodovar, Adriana Aparecida Buzzo
Pinto, Terezinha de Jesus Andreoli
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hilinski, Ellen Gameiro
Bugno, Adriana
Silva, Fernando Pontes de Lima e
Almodovar, Adriana Aparecida Buzzo
Pinto, Terezinha de Jesus Andreoli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hemodialysis
Treated Water
Heterotrophic Bacteria
Fluorescence
Hemodiálise
Água Tratada
Bactérias Heterotróficas
Fluorescência
topic Hemodialysis
Treated Water
Heterotrophic Bacteria
Fluorescence
Hemodiálise
Água Tratada
Bactérias Heterotróficas
Fluorescência
description Introduction: The microbiological quality of hemodialysis treated water is directly related to the occurrence of infections and pyrogenic reactions in patients. Objective: Determine the minimum incubation time and evaluate the alternative microbiological method performance for heterotrophic bacteria count in hemodialysis water through the fluorescence microbial detection technique. Method: The analyses were conducted by concentration levels of 2,5 x 10-1 to 1,0 x 102 CFU/plate for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The tests were performed simultaneously by the alternative and the traditional methods, using culture medium R2A and incubation temperature of 24.0°C ± 4.0°C. The incubation times were 40 h and 120 h, respectively. Fourteen hemodialysis water samples were analyzed to assess the equivalence between the methods evaluated. Results: The results demonstrated that the alternative method allows quantification of heterotrophic bacteria after 40 h of incubation, with accuracy, precision, specificity and linearity for the range of 5 to 100 CFU/plate. The detection limit of the alternative method is 1 CFU/plate. Conclusions: It was possible to conclude that the alternative method has equivalent results to the traditional method, since the confidence interval of the alternative method was entirely within the equivalence range. Therefore, the microbial detection technique by fluorescence showed a viable option for the implementation of a rapid microbiological method for the heterotrophic bacteria count in samples of treated water for hemodialysis.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1387
10.22239/2317-269X.01387
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1387
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.01387
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1387/1220
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1387/1221
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): May; 94-105
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2020): Puede; 94-105
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 8 n. 2 (2020): Maio; 94-105
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042045784686592