Evaluation of unsatisfactory reports of fruit derivatives of the Program of Monitoring Quality of Foods of the state of Minas Gerais (Progvisa/MG), from 2013–2015
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1151 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Fruits are highly perishable and easily deteriorated, so the production of derivatives in various forms such as pulps, jellies and fruit in syrup is a conservation alternative. These derivatives must be prepared in accordance with the legislation requirements. Objective: The objective of this work was to evaluate the results of the unsatisfactory reports of the Minas Gerais Sanitary Surveillance (VISA/MG) of fruit derivatives (pulps, jellies and fruit in syrup) sent to the National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance (Anvisa) in the period from 2013 to 2015, in order to identify the main irregularities. Results: We evaluated 25 reports (nine of jams in syrup, eight of fruit pulp and eight of jellies). From the analyzed reports, 100% presented an unsatisfactory conclusion for the labeling analysis; a jelly sample (12.5%) had artificial coloring not allowed; two samples of fig in syrup (29%) presented a copper content that did not comply with the legislation, and one of them (14%) had a lower carbohydrate content than that described in the labeling, indicating consumer fraud. Fruit pulps presented satisfactory results for analyses of histology and foreign matters. Conclusions: The irregularities found indicate that there is a need to adopt measures for companies to adapt their products to the requirements of the legislation. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_2bbf51cdf673ce26f9f231ce7aa7e693 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1151 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of unsatisfactory reports of fruit derivatives of the Program of Monitoring Quality of Foods of the state of Minas Gerais (Progvisa/MG), from 2013–2015Avaliação de laudos insatisfatórios de derivados de frutas do Programa de Monitoramento da Qualidade dos Alimentos do estado de Minas Gerais (Progvisa/MG) no período de 2013–2015Controle de QualidadeMonitoramentoLegislaçãoBoas Práticas de FabricaçãoAlimento SeguroQuality ControlMonitoringLegislationGood Manufacturing PracticesSafe FoodIntroduction: Fruits are highly perishable and easily deteriorated, so the production of derivatives in various forms such as pulps, jellies and fruit in syrup is a conservation alternative. These derivatives must be prepared in accordance with the legislation requirements. Objective: The objective of this work was to evaluate the results of the unsatisfactory reports of the Minas Gerais Sanitary Surveillance (VISA/MG) of fruit derivatives (pulps, jellies and fruit in syrup) sent to the National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance (Anvisa) in the period from 2013 to 2015, in order to identify the main irregularities. Results: We evaluated 25 reports (nine of jams in syrup, eight of fruit pulp and eight of jellies). From the analyzed reports, 100% presented an unsatisfactory conclusion for the labeling analysis; a jelly sample (12.5%) had artificial coloring not allowed; two samples of fig in syrup (29%) presented a copper content that did not comply with the legislation, and one of them (14%) had a lower carbohydrate content than that described in the labeling, indicating consumer fraud. Fruit pulps presented satisfactory results for analyses of histology and foreign matters. Conclusions: The irregularities found indicate that there is a need to adopt measures for companies to adapt their products to the requirements of the legislation.Introdução: Frutas são altamente perecíveis e de fácil deterioração, assim, a produção de seus derivados, sob variadas formas, como polpas, geleias e frutas em calda é uma alternativa de conservação. Estes derivados devem ser elaborados de acordo com os parâmetros e padrões estabelecidos nas legislações. Objetivo: Avaliar os resultados das análises de laudos insatisfatórios da Vigilância Sanitária de Minas Gerais (VISA/MG) de derivados de frutas (polpas, geleias e frutas em calda) encaminhados para a Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa), no período de 2013 a 2015, a fim de se identificar as principais irregularidades. Resultados: Foram avaliados 25 laudos (nove de doces em calda, oito de polpas de frutas e oito de geleias). Dos laudos analisados, 100,0% apresentaram conclusão insatisfatória para a análise de rotulagem: uma amostra de geleia (12,5%) apresentou corante artificial não permitido; em duas amostras de figo em calda (29,0%) havia teor de cobre em desacordo com a legislação e, em uma destas (14,0%), teor de carboidratos menor do que o descrito na rotulagem, indicando fraude ao consumidor. As polpas de frutas apresentaram resultados satisfatórios para as análises de histologia e matérias estranhas. Conclusões: As irregularidades constatadas indicam que há necessidade de adoção de medidas para que as empresas adequem seus produtos aos requisitos da legislação.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2018-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/115110.22239/2317-269X.01151Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2018): November; 79-85Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2018): Noviembre; 79-85Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 6 n. 4 (2018): Novembro; 79-852317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1151/541https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1151/576Copyright (c) 2018 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Paula Bernadete de MouraMachado, Mírian Ribeiro Galvão2023-06-27T15:20:10Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1151Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:20:10Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of unsatisfactory reports of fruit derivatives of the Program of Monitoring Quality of Foods of the state of Minas Gerais (Progvisa/MG), from 2013–2015 Avaliação de laudos insatisfatórios de derivados de frutas do Programa de Monitoramento da Qualidade dos Alimentos do estado de Minas Gerais (Progvisa/MG) no período de 2013–2015 |
title |
Evaluation of unsatisfactory reports of fruit derivatives of the Program of Monitoring Quality of Foods of the state of Minas Gerais (Progvisa/MG), from 2013–2015 |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of unsatisfactory reports of fruit derivatives of the Program of Monitoring Quality of Foods of the state of Minas Gerais (Progvisa/MG), from 2013–2015 Ferreira, Paula Bernadete de Moura Controle de Qualidade Monitoramento Legislação Boas Práticas de Fabricação Alimento Seguro Quality Control Monitoring Legislation Good Manufacturing Practices Safe Food |
title_short |
Evaluation of unsatisfactory reports of fruit derivatives of the Program of Monitoring Quality of Foods of the state of Minas Gerais (Progvisa/MG), from 2013–2015 |
title_full |
Evaluation of unsatisfactory reports of fruit derivatives of the Program of Monitoring Quality of Foods of the state of Minas Gerais (Progvisa/MG), from 2013–2015 |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of unsatisfactory reports of fruit derivatives of the Program of Monitoring Quality of Foods of the state of Minas Gerais (Progvisa/MG), from 2013–2015 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of unsatisfactory reports of fruit derivatives of the Program of Monitoring Quality of Foods of the state of Minas Gerais (Progvisa/MG), from 2013–2015 |
title_sort |
Evaluation of unsatisfactory reports of fruit derivatives of the Program of Monitoring Quality of Foods of the state of Minas Gerais (Progvisa/MG), from 2013–2015 |
author |
Ferreira, Paula Bernadete de Moura |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Paula Bernadete de Moura Machado, Mírian Ribeiro Galvão |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Machado, Mírian Ribeiro Galvão |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Paula Bernadete de Moura Machado, Mírian Ribeiro Galvão |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Controle de Qualidade Monitoramento Legislação Boas Práticas de Fabricação Alimento Seguro Quality Control Monitoring Legislation Good Manufacturing Practices Safe Food |
topic |
Controle de Qualidade Monitoramento Legislação Boas Práticas de Fabricação Alimento Seguro Quality Control Monitoring Legislation Good Manufacturing Practices Safe Food |
description |
Introduction: Fruits are highly perishable and easily deteriorated, so the production of derivatives in various forms such as pulps, jellies and fruit in syrup is a conservation alternative. These derivatives must be prepared in accordance with the legislation requirements. Objective: The objective of this work was to evaluate the results of the unsatisfactory reports of the Minas Gerais Sanitary Surveillance (VISA/MG) of fruit derivatives (pulps, jellies and fruit in syrup) sent to the National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance (Anvisa) in the period from 2013 to 2015, in order to identify the main irregularities. Results: We evaluated 25 reports (nine of jams in syrup, eight of fruit pulp and eight of jellies). From the analyzed reports, 100% presented an unsatisfactory conclusion for the labeling analysis; a jelly sample (12.5%) had artificial coloring not allowed; two samples of fig in syrup (29%) presented a copper content that did not comply with the legislation, and one of them (14%) had a lower carbohydrate content than that described in the labeling, indicating consumer fraud. Fruit pulps presented satisfactory results for analyses of histology and foreign matters. Conclusions: The irregularities found indicate that there is a need to adopt measures for companies to adapt their products to the requirements of the legislation. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1151 10.22239/2317-269X.01151 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1151 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01151 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1151/541 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1151/576 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2018): November; 79-85 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2018): Noviembre; 79-85 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 6 n. 4 (2018): Novembro; 79-85 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042045244669952 |