Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reali, Catiusca
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Pagnussato, Fernando, Passos Geimba , Mercedes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853
Resumo: Introduction: Corneal transplantation it is the main treatment for people who have corneal curvature or transparency disorders. In Brazil, there is no unifed protocol on the means of preservation, storage time and    antibiotics used. The concern is that pathogens are transferred to  transplant recipients, causing eye infections after transplantation. Objective: Examine ocular microbiota of corneal donors, to verify a possible correlation with infections in recipients and thus assist in improving corneal storage methodologies and protocols. Method: Literature review conducted in PubMed, SciELO and the following websites: CAPES Journals, Anvisa, Brazilian Ministry of Health and ABTO, between 2018 and 2020. Results: Studies based on microorganism’s  cultivation show coagulase negative Staphylococcus in 30% to 100% of samples isolated from conjunctiva. In lesser quantities are Streptococcus, Corynebacterium and Propionibacterium. Gram-negative bacteria appear in much lower numbers, represented by the genera Haemophilus, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Proteus and Acinetobacter. On the other hand, results based on independent cultivation techniques bring  Pseudomonas as the main colonizer of the conjunctiva. Also, they have a much greater diversity of colonizers, showing a potential feld of study. The ocular surface may have a much greater diversity of species and potential pathogens than was expected. The main means of preservation used in Brazil contain the antimicrobials gentamicin and streptomycin in their composition; however, several studies have shown that bacteria present in the means of preservation are resistant to these antibiotics. Conclusions: These data point to the need for a reassessment of the efciency of these means of preservation in decontaminating corneas for transplantation.
id FIOCRUZ-9_440319bdc97b63650d633dc2fbbcdb6e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1853
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation A influência da microbiota de doadores e do armazenamento do enxerto no transplante de córneaMicrobiota; Transplante de Córnea; Meio de Preservação; Resistência a AntimicrobianosIntroduction: Corneal transplantation it is the main treatment for people who have corneal curvature or transparency disorders. In Brazil, there is no unifed protocol on the means of preservation, storage time and    antibiotics used. The concern is that pathogens are transferred to  transplant recipients, causing eye infections after transplantation. Objective: Examine ocular microbiota of corneal donors, to verify a possible correlation with infections in recipients and thus assist in improving corneal storage methodologies and protocols. Method: Literature review conducted in PubMed, SciELO and the following websites: CAPES Journals, Anvisa, Brazilian Ministry of Health and ABTO, between 2018 and 2020. Results: Studies based on microorganism’s  cultivation show coagulase negative Staphylococcus in 30% to 100% of samples isolated from conjunctiva. In lesser quantities are Streptococcus, Corynebacterium and Propionibacterium. Gram-negative bacteria appear in much lower numbers, represented by the genera Haemophilus, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Proteus and Acinetobacter. On the other hand, results based on independent cultivation techniques bring  Pseudomonas as the main colonizer of the conjunctiva. Also, they have a much greater diversity of colonizers, showing a potential feld of study. The ocular surface may have a much greater diversity of species and potential pathogens than was expected. The main means of preservation used in Brazil contain the antimicrobials gentamicin and streptomycin in their composition; however, several studies have shown that bacteria present in the means of preservation are resistant to these antibiotics. Conclusions: These data point to the need for a reassessment of the efciency of these means of preservation in decontaminating corneas for transplantation. Introdução: O transplante de córneas é o principal tratamento para pessoas que  apresentam distúrbios de curvatura ou transparência da córnea. No Brasil, não há protocolo unifcado para meios de preservação, tempo de armazenamento e antibióticos utilizados. A preocupação é a de que patógenos possam ser transferidos aos receptores de transplantes. Objetivo: Realizar o levantamento da microbiota ocular de doadores de córneas a fm de verifcar uma possível correlação com infecções em receptores e, dessa forma, auxiliar na melhoria de metodologias e protocolos de armazenamento de córneas. Método: Foi conduzido a partir de revisão da literatura, nas bases de dados PubMed, SciELO e nos portais: periódicos da CAPES, Anvisa, Ministério da Saúde e ABTO, entre 2018 e 2020. Resultados: Estudos baseados em cultivo de microrganismos trazem Staphylococcus coagulase negativa (SCN) de 30% a 100% das amostras isoladas de conjuntivas. Em menor quantidade estão Streptococcus, Corynebacterium e Propionibacterium. Bactérias Gramnegativas aparecem em número inferior, representadas pelos gêneros Haemophilus, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Proteus e Acinetobacter. Já as técnicas independentes de cultivo trazem Pseudomonas como a principal colonizadora da conjuntiva. Também apresentam uma diversidade maior de colonizadores, mostrando um potencial campo de estudos, no qual a superfície ocular pode ter uma diversidade muito maior de espécies e potenciais agentes patogênicos. Os principais meios de preservação utilizados no Brasil levam os antimicrobianos gentamicina e estreptomicina em sua composição, porém estudos têm mostrado que as bactérias presentes nos meios de preservação são resistentes a esses antibióticos. Conclusões: Os dados apontam para a necessidade de reavaliação da efciência desses meios de preservação na descontaminação das córneas para transplante.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2022-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/185310.22239/2317-269X.01853Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): February; 44-54Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2022): Febrero ; 44-54Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 1 (2022): Fevereiro; 44-542317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853/1389https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853/1420Copyright (c) 2022 Vigilancia Sanitaria em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReali, CatiuscaPagnussato, FernandoPassos Geimba , Mercedes2023-06-27T15:14:41Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1853Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:14:41Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation
A influência da microbiota de doadores e do armazenamento do enxerto no transplante de córnea
title Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation
spellingShingle Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation
Reali, Catiusca
Microbiota; Transplante de Córnea; Meio de Preservação; Resistência a Antimicrobianos
title_short Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation
title_full Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation
title_fullStr Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation
title_sort Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation
author Reali, Catiusca
author_facet Reali, Catiusca
Pagnussato, Fernando
Passos Geimba , Mercedes
author_role author
author2 Pagnussato, Fernando
Passos Geimba , Mercedes
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reali, Catiusca
Pagnussato, Fernando
Passos Geimba , Mercedes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Microbiota; Transplante de Córnea; Meio de Preservação; Resistência a Antimicrobianos
topic Microbiota; Transplante de Córnea; Meio de Preservação; Resistência a Antimicrobianos
description Introduction: Corneal transplantation it is the main treatment for people who have corneal curvature or transparency disorders. In Brazil, there is no unifed protocol on the means of preservation, storage time and    antibiotics used. The concern is that pathogens are transferred to  transplant recipients, causing eye infections after transplantation. Objective: Examine ocular microbiota of corneal donors, to verify a possible correlation with infections in recipients and thus assist in improving corneal storage methodologies and protocols. Method: Literature review conducted in PubMed, SciELO and the following websites: CAPES Journals, Anvisa, Brazilian Ministry of Health and ABTO, between 2018 and 2020. Results: Studies based on microorganism’s  cultivation show coagulase negative Staphylococcus in 30% to 100% of samples isolated from conjunctiva. In lesser quantities are Streptococcus, Corynebacterium and Propionibacterium. Gram-negative bacteria appear in much lower numbers, represented by the genera Haemophilus, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Proteus and Acinetobacter. On the other hand, results based on independent cultivation techniques bring  Pseudomonas as the main colonizer of the conjunctiva. Also, they have a much greater diversity of colonizers, showing a potential feld of study. The ocular surface may have a much greater diversity of species and potential pathogens than was expected. The main means of preservation used in Brazil contain the antimicrobials gentamicin and streptomycin in their composition; however, several studies have shown that bacteria present in the means of preservation are resistant to these antibiotics. Conclusions: These data point to the need for a reassessment of the efciency of these means of preservation in decontaminating corneas for transplantation.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853
10.22239/2317-269X.01853
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.01853
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853/1389
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853/1420
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Vigilancia Sanitaria em Debate
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Vigilancia Sanitaria em Debate
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): February; 44-54
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2022): Febrero ; 44-54
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 1 (2022): Fevereiro; 44-54
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042046521835520