Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Corneal transplantation it is the main treatment for people who have corneal curvature or transparency disorders. In Brazil, there is no unifed protocol on the means of preservation, storage time and antibiotics used. The concern is that pathogens are transferred to transplant recipients, causing eye infections after transplantation. Objective: Examine ocular microbiota of corneal donors, to verify a possible correlation with infections in recipients and thus assist in improving corneal storage methodologies and protocols. Method: Literature review conducted in PubMed, SciELO and the following websites: CAPES Journals, Anvisa, Brazilian Ministry of Health and ABTO, between 2018 and 2020. Results: Studies based on microorganism’s cultivation show coagulase negative Staphylococcus in 30% to 100% of samples isolated from conjunctiva. In lesser quantities are Streptococcus, Corynebacterium and Propionibacterium. Gram-negative bacteria appear in much lower numbers, represented by the genera Haemophilus, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Proteus and Acinetobacter. On the other hand, results based on independent cultivation techniques bring Pseudomonas as the main colonizer of the conjunctiva. Also, they have a much greater diversity of colonizers, showing a potential feld of study. The ocular surface may have a much greater diversity of species and potential pathogens than was expected. The main means of preservation used in Brazil contain the antimicrobials gentamicin and streptomycin in their composition; however, several studies have shown that bacteria present in the means of preservation are resistant to these antibiotics. Conclusions: These data point to the need for a reassessment of the efciency of these means of preservation in decontaminating corneas for transplantation. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_440319bdc97b63650d633dc2fbbcdb6e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1853 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation A influência da microbiota de doadores e do armazenamento do enxerto no transplante de córneaMicrobiota; Transplante de Córnea; Meio de Preservação; Resistência a AntimicrobianosIntroduction: Corneal transplantation it is the main treatment for people who have corneal curvature or transparency disorders. In Brazil, there is no unifed protocol on the means of preservation, storage time and antibiotics used. The concern is that pathogens are transferred to transplant recipients, causing eye infections after transplantation. Objective: Examine ocular microbiota of corneal donors, to verify a possible correlation with infections in recipients and thus assist in improving corneal storage methodologies and protocols. Method: Literature review conducted in PubMed, SciELO and the following websites: CAPES Journals, Anvisa, Brazilian Ministry of Health and ABTO, between 2018 and 2020. Results: Studies based on microorganism’s cultivation show coagulase negative Staphylococcus in 30% to 100% of samples isolated from conjunctiva. In lesser quantities are Streptococcus, Corynebacterium and Propionibacterium. Gram-negative bacteria appear in much lower numbers, represented by the genera Haemophilus, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Proteus and Acinetobacter. On the other hand, results based on independent cultivation techniques bring Pseudomonas as the main colonizer of the conjunctiva. Also, they have a much greater diversity of colonizers, showing a potential feld of study. The ocular surface may have a much greater diversity of species and potential pathogens than was expected. The main means of preservation used in Brazil contain the antimicrobials gentamicin and streptomycin in their composition; however, several studies have shown that bacteria present in the means of preservation are resistant to these antibiotics. Conclusions: These data point to the need for a reassessment of the efciency of these means of preservation in decontaminating corneas for transplantation. Introdução: O transplante de córneas é o principal tratamento para pessoas que apresentam distúrbios de curvatura ou transparência da córnea. No Brasil, não há protocolo unifcado para meios de preservação, tempo de armazenamento e antibióticos utilizados. A preocupação é a de que patógenos possam ser transferidos aos receptores de transplantes. Objetivo: Realizar o levantamento da microbiota ocular de doadores de córneas a fm de verifcar uma possível correlação com infecções em receptores e, dessa forma, auxiliar na melhoria de metodologias e protocolos de armazenamento de córneas. Método: Foi conduzido a partir de revisão da literatura, nas bases de dados PubMed, SciELO e nos portais: periódicos da CAPES, Anvisa, Ministério da Saúde e ABTO, entre 2018 e 2020. Resultados: Estudos baseados em cultivo de microrganismos trazem Staphylococcus coagulase negativa (SCN) de 30% a 100% das amostras isoladas de conjuntivas. Em menor quantidade estão Streptococcus, Corynebacterium e Propionibacterium. Bactérias Gramnegativas aparecem em número inferior, representadas pelos gêneros Haemophilus, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Proteus e Acinetobacter. Já as técnicas independentes de cultivo trazem Pseudomonas como a principal colonizadora da conjuntiva. Também apresentam uma diversidade maior de colonizadores, mostrando um potencial campo de estudos, no qual a superfície ocular pode ter uma diversidade muito maior de espécies e potenciais agentes patogênicos. Os principais meios de preservação utilizados no Brasil levam os antimicrobianos gentamicina e estreptomicina em sua composição, porém estudos têm mostrado que as bactérias presentes nos meios de preservação são resistentes a esses antibióticos. Conclusões: Os dados apontam para a necessidade de reavaliação da efciência desses meios de preservação na descontaminação das córneas para transplante.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2022-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/185310.22239/2317-269X.01853Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): February; 44-54Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2022): Febrero ; 44-54Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 1 (2022): Fevereiro; 44-542317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853/1389https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853/1420Copyright (c) 2022 Vigilancia Sanitaria em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReali, CatiuscaPagnussato, FernandoPassos Geimba , Mercedes2023-06-27T15:14:41Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1853Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:14:41Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation A influência da microbiota de doadores e do armazenamento do enxerto no transplante de córnea |
title |
Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation |
spellingShingle |
Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation Reali, Catiusca Microbiota; Transplante de Córnea; Meio de Preservação; Resistência a Antimicrobianos |
title_short |
Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation |
title_full |
Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation |
title_fullStr |
Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation |
title_sort |
Influence of donor microbiota and of graft storage on corneal transplantation |
author |
Reali, Catiusca |
author_facet |
Reali, Catiusca Pagnussato, Fernando Passos Geimba , Mercedes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pagnussato, Fernando Passos Geimba , Mercedes |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Reali, Catiusca Pagnussato, Fernando Passos Geimba , Mercedes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Microbiota; Transplante de Córnea; Meio de Preservação; Resistência a Antimicrobianos |
topic |
Microbiota; Transplante de Córnea; Meio de Preservação; Resistência a Antimicrobianos |
description |
Introduction: Corneal transplantation it is the main treatment for people who have corneal curvature or transparency disorders. In Brazil, there is no unifed protocol on the means of preservation, storage time and antibiotics used. The concern is that pathogens are transferred to transplant recipients, causing eye infections after transplantation. Objective: Examine ocular microbiota of corneal donors, to verify a possible correlation with infections in recipients and thus assist in improving corneal storage methodologies and protocols. Method: Literature review conducted in PubMed, SciELO and the following websites: CAPES Journals, Anvisa, Brazilian Ministry of Health and ABTO, between 2018 and 2020. Results: Studies based on microorganism’s cultivation show coagulase negative Staphylococcus in 30% to 100% of samples isolated from conjunctiva. In lesser quantities are Streptococcus, Corynebacterium and Propionibacterium. Gram-negative bacteria appear in much lower numbers, represented by the genera Haemophilus, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Proteus and Acinetobacter. On the other hand, results based on independent cultivation techniques bring Pseudomonas as the main colonizer of the conjunctiva. Also, they have a much greater diversity of colonizers, showing a potential feld of study. The ocular surface may have a much greater diversity of species and potential pathogens than was expected. The main means of preservation used in Brazil contain the antimicrobials gentamicin and streptomycin in their composition; however, several studies have shown that bacteria present in the means of preservation are resistant to these antibiotics. Conclusions: These data point to the need for a reassessment of the efciency of these means of preservation in decontaminating corneas for transplantation. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853 10.22239/2317-269X.01853 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01853 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853/1389 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1853/1420 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Vigilancia Sanitaria em Debate https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Vigilancia Sanitaria em Debate https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): February; 44-54 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2022): Febrero ; 44-54 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 1 (2022): Fevereiro; 44-54 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042046521835520 |