Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Matos, Rafael Christian de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Nunes , Adriane Zacarias, Silva, Elisângela Alves, Dias, Edilânia Castro, Dutra, Ramon da Silva, Silveira, Aline Magalhães de Matos da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930
Resumo: Introduction: In the daily routine of Health Professionals, mainly in the midst of the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic, facemasks are important devices; however, there is no post market control for these products. Objective: Evaluate the Adverse Events (AE) and Technical Complaints (TC) related to  facemasks and respirators, to list and categorize the public health problems involving these products. Method: Cross-sectional, descriptive, retrospective and documental study with a quantitative approach, including data from January 2010 to May 2020 available in the Notivisa system. The analyzed data had national coverage and were reclassified, when necessary, according to their category (EA or QT). Results: 443 notifications were included in the study containing 519 claims (AE and TC). The data distribution on the analized decade presented an accentuated decrease; the Southeast region had the highest prevalence of claims in Brazil. Most of the notifying companies were health establishments and the highest prevalence of health events found were Adverse Events that affected the user when fixing strips and nose clips (such as detachment of the nose clip and breaking of the fixation straps during use),  indicating serious biosecurity problems. Conclusions: This study characterized the Adverse Events and the Technical Complaints in facemasks focusing on health promotion and indicating the necessity of sanitary monitoring  improvement of the products.
id FIOCRUZ-9_480ca62f11919e5701c6d629ce572774
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1930
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasksPanorama das notificações de eventos adversos e queixas técnicas em máscarasFacemasksAdverse EventsProduct Health SurveillancePandemicMáscarasEventos AdversosVigilância Sanitária de ProdutosPandemiaTecnovigilânciaNOTIVISAPrevençãoBiossegurançaIntroduction: In the daily routine of Health Professionals, mainly in the midst of the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic, facemasks are important devices; however, there is no post market control for these products. Objective: Evaluate the Adverse Events (AE) and Technical Complaints (TC) related to  facemasks and respirators, to list and categorize the public health problems involving these products. Method: Cross-sectional, descriptive, retrospective and documental study with a quantitative approach, including data from January 2010 to May 2020 available in the Notivisa system. The analyzed data had national coverage and were reclassified, when necessary, according to their category (EA or QT). Results: 443 notifications were included in the study containing 519 claims (AE and TC). The data distribution on the analized decade presented an accentuated decrease; the Southeast region had the highest prevalence of claims in Brazil. Most of the notifying companies were health establishments and the highest prevalence of health events found were Adverse Events that affected the user when fixing strips and nose clips (such as detachment of the nose clip and breaking of the fixation straps during use),  indicating serious biosecurity problems. Conclusions: This study characterized the Adverse Events and the Technical Complaints in facemasks focusing on health promotion and indicating the necessity of sanitary monitoring  improvement of the products.Introdução: No cotidiano dos profissionais de saúde, principalmente no enfrentamento à pandemia do SARS-CoV-2, as máscaras são artigos de suma importância, porém não existe programa de controle de pós-comercialização para tais produtos. Objetivo: Avaliar os eventos adversos (EA) e as queixas técnicas (QT) de máscaras dos tipos cirúrgicas e respiradores, a fim de elencar e categorizar os problemas de saúde pública envolvendo o produto. Método: Estudo transversal, descritivo, retrospectivo, documental com abordagem quantitativa, englobando dados de janeiro de 2010 a maio de 2020 disponibilizados no sistema Notivisa. Osdados analisados tiveram abrangência nacional que foram reclassificados, quando necessário, acerca da sua categoria (EA ou QT). Resultado: Incluiu-se 443 notificações no estudo, que continham no total 519 reclamações (EA e QT). A distribuição dos dados na década analisada apresentou acentuado decréscimo, sendo a Região Sudeste do país a com maior prevalência de notificações no Brasil. A maior parte das empresas notificantes foram estabelecimentos de saúde, valendo destacar que a maior prevalência de eventos de saúde encontrados para este produto foram EA relacionados a problemas que afetavam o usuário nas tiras de fixação e clipe nasal dos produtos (como  desprendimento do clipe nasal e rompimento das tiras de fixação durante o uso) indicando graves indícios de problemas de biossegurança em sua utilização. Conclusões: A pesquisa caracterizou os EA e as QT de máscaras com enfoque na promoção da saúde, indicando a necessidade da implantação do monitoramento sanitário dos produtos.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2022-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/193010.22239/2317-269x.01930Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022): August; 58-66Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 3 (2022): Agosto; 58-66Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 3 (2022): Agosto; 58-662317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930/1441https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930/1481Copyright (c) 2022 Rafael Christian de Matos, Adriane Zacarias Nunes, Elisângela Alves Silva, Edilânia Castro Dias, Ramon da Silva Dutra, Aline Magalhães de Matos da Silveirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMatos, Rafael Christian deNunes , Adriane Zacarias Silva, Elisângela AlvesDias, Edilânia Castro Dutra, Ramon da SilvaSilveira, Aline Magalhães de Matos da2023-06-27T15:15:33Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1930Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:15:33Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks
Panorama das notificações de eventos adversos e queixas técnicas em máscaras
title Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks
spellingShingle Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks
Matos, Rafael Christian de
Facemasks
Adverse Events
Product Health Surveillance
Pandemic
Máscaras
Eventos Adversos
Vigilância Sanitária de Produtos
Pandemia
Tecnovigilância
NOTIVISA
Prevenção
Biossegurança
title_short Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks
title_full Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks
title_fullStr Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks
title_full_unstemmed Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks
title_sort Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks
author Matos, Rafael Christian de
author_facet Matos, Rafael Christian de
Nunes , Adriane Zacarias
Silva, Elisângela Alves
Dias, Edilânia Castro
Dutra, Ramon da Silva
Silveira, Aline Magalhães de Matos da
author_role author
author2 Nunes , Adriane Zacarias
Silva, Elisângela Alves
Dias, Edilânia Castro
Dutra, Ramon da Silva
Silveira, Aline Magalhães de Matos da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Matos, Rafael Christian de
Nunes , Adriane Zacarias
Silva, Elisângela Alves
Dias, Edilânia Castro
Dutra, Ramon da Silva
Silveira, Aline Magalhães de Matos da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Facemasks
Adverse Events
Product Health Surveillance
Pandemic
Máscaras
Eventos Adversos
Vigilância Sanitária de Produtos
Pandemia
Tecnovigilância
NOTIVISA
Prevenção
Biossegurança
topic Facemasks
Adverse Events
Product Health Surveillance
Pandemic
Máscaras
Eventos Adversos
Vigilância Sanitária de Produtos
Pandemia
Tecnovigilância
NOTIVISA
Prevenção
Biossegurança
description Introduction: In the daily routine of Health Professionals, mainly in the midst of the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic, facemasks are important devices; however, there is no post market control for these products. Objective: Evaluate the Adverse Events (AE) and Technical Complaints (TC) related to  facemasks and respirators, to list and categorize the public health problems involving these products. Method: Cross-sectional, descriptive, retrospective and documental study with a quantitative approach, including data from January 2010 to May 2020 available in the Notivisa system. The analyzed data had national coverage and were reclassified, when necessary, according to their category (EA or QT). Results: 443 notifications were included in the study containing 519 claims (AE and TC). The data distribution on the analized decade presented an accentuated decrease; the Southeast region had the highest prevalence of claims in Brazil. Most of the notifying companies were health establishments and the highest prevalence of health events found were Adverse Events that affected the user when fixing strips and nose clips (such as detachment of the nose clip and breaking of the fixation straps during use),  indicating serious biosecurity problems. Conclusions: This study characterized the Adverse Events and the Technical Complaints in facemasks focusing on health promotion and indicating the necessity of sanitary monitoring  improvement of the products.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930
10.22239/2317-269x.01930
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269x.01930
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930/1441
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930/1481
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022): August; 58-66
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 3 (2022): Agosto; 58-66
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 3 (2022): Agosto; 58-66
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042046565875712