Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930 |
Resumo: | Introduction: In the daily routine of Health Professionals, mainly in the midst of the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic, facemasks are important devices; however, there is no post market control for these products. Objective: Evaluate the Adverse Events (AE) and Technical Complaints (TC) related to facemasks and respirators, to list and categorize the public health problems involving these products. Method: Cross-sectional, descriptive, retrospective and documental study with a quantitative approach, including data from January 2010 to May 2020 available in the Notivisa system. The analyzed data had national coverage and were reclassified, when necessary, according to their category (EA or QT). Results: 443 notifications were included in the study containing 519 claims (AE and TC). The data distribution on the analized decade presented an accentuated decrease; the Southeast region had the highest prevalence of claims in Brazil. Most of the notifying companies were health establishments and the highest prevalence of health events found were Adverse Events that affected the user when fixing strips and nose clips (such as detachment of the nose clip and breaking of the fixation straps during use), indicating serious biosecurity problems. Conclusions: This study characterized the Adverse Events and the Technical Complaints in facemasks focusing on health promotion and indicating the necessity of sanitary monitoring improvement of the products. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_480ca62f11919e5701c6d629ce572774 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1930 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasksPanorama das notificações de eventos adversos e queixas técnicas em máscarasFacemasksAdverse EventsProduct Health SurveillancePandemicMáscarasEventos AdversosVigilância Sanitária de ProdutosPandemiaTecnovigilânciaNOTIVISAPrevençãoBiossegurançaIntroduction: In the daily routine of Health Professionals, mainly in the midst of the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic, facemasks are important devices; however, there is no post market control for these products. Objective: Evaluate the Adverse Events (AE) and Technical Complaints (TC) related to facemasks and respirators, to list and categorize the public health problems involving these products. Method: Cross-sectional, descriptive, retrospective and documental study with a quantitative approach, including data from January 2010 to May 2020 available in the Notivisa system. The analyzed data had national coverage and were reclassified, when necessary, according to their category (EA or QT). Results: 443 notifications were included in the study containing 519 claims (AE and TC). The data distribution on the analized decade presented an accentuated decrease; the Southeast region had the highest prevalence of claims in Brazil. Most of the notifying companies were health establishments and the highest prevalence of health events found were Adverse Events that affected the user when fixing strips and nose clips (such as detachment of the nose clip and breaking of the fixation straps during use), indicating serious biosecurity problems. Conclusions: This study characterized the Adverse Events and the Technical Complaints in facemasks focusing on health promotion and indicating the necessity of sanitary monitoring improvement of the products.Introdução: No cotidiano dos profissionais de saúde, principalmente no enfrentamento à pandemia do SARS-CoV-2, as máscaras são artigos de suma importância, porém não existe programa de controle de pós-comercialização para tais produtos. Objetivo: Avaliar os eventos adversos (EA) e as queixas técnicas (QT) de máscaras dos tipos cirúrgicas e respiradores, a fim de elencar e categorizar os problemas de saúde pública envolvendo o produto. Método: Estudo transversal, descritivo, retrospectivo, documental com abordagem quantitativa, englobando dados de janeiro de 2010 a maio de 2020 disponibilizados no sistema Notivisa. Osdados analisados tiveram abrangência nacional que foram reclassificados, quando necessário, acerca da sua categoria (EA ou QT). Resultado: Incluiu-se 443 notificações no estudo, que continham no total 519 reclamações (EA e QT). A distribuição dos dados na década analisada apresentou acentuado decréscimo, sendo a Região Sudeste do país a com maior prevalência de notificações no Brasil. A maior parte das empresas notificantes foram estabelecimentos de saúde, valendo destacar que a maior prevalência de eventos de saúde encontrados para este produto foram EA relacionados a problemas que afetavam o usuário nas tiras de fixação e clipe nasal dos produtos (como desprendimento do clipe nasal e rompimento das tiras de fixação durante o uso) indicando graves indícios de problemas de biossegurança em sua utilização. Conclusões: A pesquisa caracterizou os EA e as QT de máscaras com enfoque na promoção da saúde, indicando a necessidade da implantação do monitoramento sanitário dos produtos.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2022-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/193010.22239/2317-269x.01930Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022): August; 58-66Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 3 (2022): Agosto; 58-66Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 3 (2022): Agosto; 58-662317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930/1441https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930/1481Copyright (c) 2022 Rafael Christian de Matos, Adriane Zacarias Nunes, Elisângela Alves Silva, Edilânia Castro Dias, Ramon da Silva Dutra, Aline Magalhães de Matos da Silveirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMatos, Rafael Christian deNunes , Adriane Zacarias Silva, Elisângela AlvesDias, Edilânia Castro Dutra, Ramon da SilvaSilveira, Aline Magalhães de Matos da2023-06-27T15:15:33Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1930Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:15:33Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks Panorama das notificações de eventos adversos e queixas técnicas em máscaras |
title |
Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks |
spellingShingle |
Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks Matos, Rafael Christian de Facemasks Adverse Events Product Health Surveillance Pandemic Máscaras Eventos Adversos Vigilância Sanitária de Produtos Pandemia Tecnovigilância NOTIVISA Prevenção Biossegurança |
title_short |
Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks |
title_full |
Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks |
title_fullStr |
Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks |
title_sort |
Panorama of notifications about adverse events and technical complaints related to facemasks |
author |
Matos, Rafael Christian de |
author_facet |
Matos, Rafael Christian de Nunes , Adriane Zacarias Silva, Elisângela Alves Dias, Edilânia Castro Dutra, Ramon da Silva Silveira, Aline Magalhães de Matos da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nunes , Adriane Zacarias Silva, Elisângela Alves Dias, Edilânia Castro Dutra, Ramon da Silva Silveira, Aline Magalhães de Matos da |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Matos, Rafael Christian de Nunes , Adriane Zacarias Silva, Elisângela Alves Dias, Edilânia Castro Dutra, Ramon da Silva Silveira, Aline Magalhães de Matos da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Facemasks Adverse Events Product Health Surveillance Pandemic Máscaras Eventos Adversos Vigilância Sanitária de Produtos Pandemia Tecnovigilância NOTIVISA Prevenção Biossegurança |
topic |
Facemasks Adverse Events Product Health Surveillance Pandemic Máscaras Eventos Adversos Vigilância Sanitária de Produtos Pandemia Tecnovigilância NOTIVISA Prevenção Biossegurança |
description |
Introduction: In the daily routine of Health Professionals, mainly in the midst of the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic, facemasks are important devices; however, there is no post market control for these products. Objective: Evaluate the Adverse Events (AE) and Technical Complaints (TC) related to facemasks and respirators, to list and categorize the public health problems involving these products. Method: Cross-sectional, descriptive, retrospective and documental study with a quantitative approach, including data from January 2010 to May 2020 available in the Notivisa system. The analyzed data had national coverage and were reclassified, when necessary, according to their category (EA or QT). Results: 443 notifications were included in the study containing 519 claims (AE and TC). The data distribution on the analized decade presented an accentuated decrease; the Southeast region had the highest prevalence of claims in Brazil. Most of the notifying companies were health establishments and the highest prevalence of health events found were Adverse Events that affected the user when fixing strips and nose clips (such as detachment of the nose clip and breaking of the fixation straps during use), indicating serious biosecurity problems. Conclusions: This study characterized the Adverse Events and the Technical Complaints in facemasks focusing on health promotion and indicating the necessity of sanitary monitoring improvement of the products. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930 10.22239/2317-269x.01930 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269x.01930 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930/1441 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1930/1481 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022): August; 58-66 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 10 Núm. 3 (2022): Agosto; 58-66 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 10 n. 3 (2022): Agosto; 58-66 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042046565875712 |