Profile of prescription errors of compounding medications in a scholl pharmacy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
DOI: | 10.22239/2317-269X.01194 |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1194 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The manipulated medicinal product is a masterly preparation individualized to a patient from a prescription. Objective: To evaluate prescriptions at a compounding pharmacy of a federal public university in Rio de Janeiro, and to evaluate compliance with these prescriptions, in relation to the current technical-sanitary criteria. Method: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study, which evaluated 400 prescriptions in May 2015. Results: About 162 (40,00%) prescriptions presented errors, of which 132 showed exclusively bookkeeping errors, 20 exclusively, pharmacotechnical errors, and 10 both errors. Among the errors in bookkeeping, the most frequent were absence of date of issue (29%) and posology (13,00%). Among the pharmacotechnical errors, 66.33% were of incompatibility between the active and formulation, 13.33% were incompatibilities between different active in the same formulation and 23.33% were incompatibilities of the active with the semi-solid vehicle. Therefore, it was possible to identify that the prescriptions analyzed did not adequately comply with the Brazilian legislation, as errors were verified in both bookkeeping and pharmacotechnical aspects. Conclusions: Because they are manipulated drugs, which must be developed through a prescription, it is essential to carefully evaluate them to minimize or avoid damages to users. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_58b9a459db22a17da4849dc1b60e6385 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1194 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
spelling |
Profile of prescription errors of compounding medications in a scholl pharmacyPerfil dos erros de prescrições de medicamentos manipulados em uma farmácia-escolaDrugs PrescriptionPharmaceutical CompoundingPharmacoepidemiologyPrescrição de MedicamentosFarmácia com ManipulaçãoFarmacoepidemiologiaIntroduction: The manipulated medicinal product is a masterly preparation individualized to a patient from a prescription. Objective: To evaluate prescriptions at a compounding pharmacy of a federal public university in Rio de Janeiro, and to evaluate compliance with these prescriptions, in relation to the current technical-sanitary criteria. Method: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study, which evaluated 400 prescriptions in May 2015. Results: About 162 (40,00%) prescriptions presented errors, of which 132 showed exclusively bookkeeping errors, 20 exclusively, pharmacotechnical errors, and 10 both errors. Among the errors in bookkeeping, the most frequent were absence of date of issue (29%) and posology (13,00%). Among the pharmacotechnical errors, 66.33% were of incompatibility between the active and formulation, 13.33% were incompatibilities between different active in the same formulation and 23.33% were incompatibilities of the active with the semi-solid vehicle. Therefore, it was possible to identify that the prescriptions analyzed did not adequately comply with the Brazilian legislation, as errors were verified in both bookkeeping and pharmacotechnical aspects. Conclusions: Because they are manipulated drugs, which must be developed through a prescription, it is essential to carefully evaluate them to minimize or avoid damages to users.Introdução: O medicamento manipulado é uma preparação magistral individualizada a um paciente a partir de uma prescrição. Objetivo: Avaliar as prescrições atendidas em uma farmácia com manipulação de uma universidade pública federal no Rio de Janeiro e avaliar o cumprimento destas prescrições, em relação aos critérios técnico-sanitários vigentes. Método: Estudo transversal descritivo no período do mês de maio de 2015, que avaliou 400 prescrições atendidas no período. Resultados: Cerca de 162 (40,00%) prescrições apresentaram erros, das quais 132 prescrições mostraram, exclusivamente, erros de escrituração, 20 exclusivamente erros farmacotécnicos e 10 ambos os erros. Dentre os erros de escrituração, os mais frequentes foram ausência de data de emissão (29,00%) e posologia (13,00%). Entre os erros farmacotécnicos, 66,33% foram de incompatibilidade entre o ativo e formulação, 13,33% foram incompatibilidades entre diferentes ativos de uma mesma formulação e 23,33% foram incompatibilidades do ativo com a base semissólida prescrita. Portanto, foi possível identificar que as prescrições analisadas não atenderam adequadamente ao estabelecido na legislação brasileira, pois verificou-se erros tanto dos aspectos da escrituração quanto farmacotécnico. Conclusões: Por se tratarem de medicamentos magistrais, os quais devem ser desenvolvidos mediante uma prescrição, torna-se fundamental a avaliação criteriosa para minimizar ou evitar danos aos usuários.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2019-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/119410.22239/2317-269X.01194Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): February; 5-13Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2019): Febrero; 5-13Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 1 (2019): Fevereiro; 5-132317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1194/988https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1194/1078Copyright (c) 2019 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Felipe CárdiaPassos, Márcia Maria Barros dosMelo, Adriana Silveira Pereira deMonteiro, Mariana Sato de Souza Bustamante2023-06-27T16:49:42Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1194Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T16:49:42Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Profile of prescription errors of compounding medications in a scholl pharmacy Perfil dos erros de prescrições de medicamentos manipulados em uma farmácia-escola |
title |
Profile of prescription errors of compounding medications in a scholl pharmacy |
spellingShingle |
Profile of prescription errors of compounding medications in a scholl pharmacy Profile of prescription errors of compounding medications in a scholl pharmacy Alves, Felipe Cárdia Drugs Prescription Pharmaceutical Compounding Pharmacoepidemiology Prescrição de Medicamentos Farmácia com Manipulação Farmacoepidemiologia Alves, Felipe Cárdia Drugs Prescription Pharmaceutical Compounding Pharmacoepidemiology Prescrição de Medicamentos Farmácia com Manipulação Farmacoepidemiologia |
title_short |
Profile of prescription errors of compounding medications in a scholl pharmacy |
title_full |
Profile of prescription errors of compounding medications in a scholl pharmacy |
title_fullStr |
Profile of prescription errors of compounding medications in a scholl pharmacy Profile of prescription errors of compounding medications in a scholl pharmacy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Profile of prescription errors of compounding medications in a scholl pharmacy Profile of prescription errors of compounding medications in a scholl pharmacy |
title_sort |
Profile of prescription errors of compounding medications in a scholl pharmacy |
author |
Alves, Felipe Cárdia |
author_facet |
Alves, Felipe Cárdia Alves, Felipe Cárdia Passos, Márcia Maria Barros dos Melo, Adriana Silveira Pereira de Monteiro, Mariana Sato de Souza Bustamante Passos, Márcia Maria Barros dos Melo, Adriana Silveira Pereira de Monteiro, Mariana Sato de Souza Bustamante |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Passos, Márcia Maria Barros dos Melo, Adriana Silveira Pereira de Monteiro, Mariana Sato de Souza Bustamante |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves, Felipe Cárdia Passos, Márcia Maria Barros dos Melo, Adriana Silveira Pereira de Monteiro, Mariana Sato de Souza Bustamante |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Drugs Prescription Pharmaceutical Compounding Pharmacoepidemiology Prescrição de Medicamentos Farmácia com Manipulação Farmacoepidemiologia |
topic |
Drugs Prescription Pharmaceutical Compounding Pharmacoepidemiology Prescrição de Medicamentos Farmácia com Manipulação Farmacoepidemiologia |
description |
Introduction: The manipulated medicinal product is a masterly preparation individualized to a patient from a prescription. Objective: To evaluate prescriptions at a compounding pharmacy of a federal public university in Rio de Janeiro, and to evaluate compliance with these prescriptions, in relation to the current technical-sanitary criteria. Method: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study, which evaluated 400 prescriptions in May 2015. Results: About 162 (40,00%) prescriptions presented errors, of which 132 showed exclusively bookkeeping errors, 20 exclusively, pharmacotechnical errors, and 10 both errors. Among the errors in bookkeeping, the most frequent were absence of date of issue (29%) and posology (13,00%). Among the pharmacotechnical errors, 66.33% were of incompatibility between the active and formulation, 13.33% were incompatibilities between different active in the same formulation and 23.33% were incompatibilities of the active with the semi-solid vehicle. Therefore, it was possible to identify that the prescriptions analyzed did not adequately comply with the Brazilian legislation, as errors were verified in both bookkeeping and pharmacotechnical aspects. Conclusions: Because they are manipulated drugs, which must be developed through a prescription, it is essential to carefully evaluate them to minimize or avoid damages to users. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1194 10.22239/2317-269X.01194 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1194 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01194 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1194/988 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1194/1078 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): February; 5-13 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2019): Febrero; 5-13 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 1 (2019): Fevereiro; 5-13 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1822182070544236544 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01194 |