Main non-conformities verified in health inspections in family farming and rural production in Minas Gerais
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1476 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The need to strengthen the initiatives of the productive model of family farming and rural producers in harmony with the procedures for the formalization and production of safe food requires that Health Surveillance departments better assess the risk related to these activities. Objective: To analyze the panorama of inadequacies to good manufacturing practices detected in the health inspections of rural producers or family farmers in the State of Minas Gerais. Method: Cross-sectional study based on the information obtained in the spreadsheet of risk notifications and risk situations (Planilha de notificações de riscos e situações de riscos) from the Health Department of Minas Gerais (Brazil). This spreadsheet collect data from all health inspections in food producing establishments of rural producers and family farmers, was carried out from January of 2017 to December of 2019, at 853 municipalities in the State. Results: 3,442 health inspection risk notifications were analyzed, showing that the highest percentages of non-compliance with hygienic-sanitary requirements were the absence of formal training for handlers, in 26.00% of inspections; the use of non-potable water detected in 16.50% and non-compliance with good practices by handlers, mentioned in 14.20%. On the contrary, the inadequacies of time and temperature in transportation (4.70%), the use of feedstock without registration (5.10%), and the inadequate exposure (6.20%) of the final products represented the non-conformities less referred to in the reports. Conclusions: The main non-conformities observed in inspections of small rural enterprises in Minas Gerais indicate that structural issues are a higher priority regarding health requirements to the detriment of educational and basic sanitation processes. These constraints on compliance with regulations expose the main vulnerabilities that hinder productive inclusion. These findings may serve as a reference for the sector’s development initiatives. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_7a2312529e419554cac29b3fb563cec6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1476 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Main non-conformities verified in health inspections in family farming and rural production in Minas GeraisPrincipais não conformidades verificadas nas inspeções sanitárias na agricultura familiar e na produção rural de Minas Gerais Public Health; Sanitary Inspection; Food Production; Public PolicySaúde Pública; Inspeção Sanitária; Produção de Alimentos; Política PúblicaSalud PublicaInspección SanitariaProducción de AlimentosPolítica PúblicaAgroindustriaIntroduction: The need to strengthen the initiatives of the productive model of family farming and rural producers in harmony with the procedures for the formalization and production of safe food requires that Health Surveillance departments better assess the risk related to these activities. Objective: To analyze the panorama of inadequacies to good manufacturing practices detected in the health inspections of rural producers or family farmers in the State of Minas Gerais. Method: Cross-sectional study based on the information obtained in the spreadsheet of risk notifications and risk situations (Planilha de notificações de riscos e situações de riscos) from the Health Department of Minas Gerais (Brazil). This spreadsheet collect data from all health inspections in food producing establishments of rural producers and family farmers, was carried out from January of 2017 to December of 2019, at 853 municipalities in the State. Results: 3,442 health inspection risk notifications were analyzed, showing that the highest percentages of non-compliance with hygienic-sanitary requirements were the absence of formal training for handlers, in 26.00% of inspections; the use of non-potable water detected in 16.50% and non-compliance with good practices by handlers, mentioned in 14.20%. On the contrary, the inadequacies of time and temperature in transportation (4.70%), the use of feedstock without registration (5.10%), and the inadequate exposure (6.20%) of the final products represented the non-conformities less referred to in the reports. Conclusions: The main non-conformities observed in inspections of small rural enterprises in Minas Gerais indicate that structural issues are a higher priority regarding health requirements to the detriment of educational and basic sanitation processes. These constraints on compliance with regulations expose the main vulnerabilities that hinder productive inclusion. These findings may serve as a reference for the sector’s development initiatives.Introdução: A necessidade do fortalecimento das iniciativas do modelo produtivo de agricultura familiar e do produtor rural em harmonia com os procedimentos de formalização e da produção de alimentos seguros requer da Vigilância Sanitária melhor apreciação do risco relacionado à essas atividades. Objetivo: Analisar o panorama das inadequações às boas práticas de fabricação detectadas nas inspeções sanitárias de produtores rurais ou de agricultores familiares, do estado de Minas Gerais. Método: Estudo transversal elaborado a partir das informações obtidas na “Planilha de notificações de riscos e situações de riscos”, da Superintendência de Vigilância Sanitária de Minas Gerais, resultado de todas as inspeções realizadas entre 2017 e 2019 nos estabelecimentos produtores de alimentos dos produtores rurais e agricultores familiares, dos 853 municípios do estado de Minas Gerais. Resultados: Foram analisadas 3.442 notificações de risco de inspeções sanitárias, sendo possível verificar que os maiores percentuais de não atendimento aos requisitos higiênico-sanitários foram a ausência da capacitação formal dos manipuladores, em 26,00% das inspeções; o uso de água não potável, detectada em 16,50% e a não obediência às boas práticas, pelos manipuladores, citada em 14,20%. Ao contrário, as inadequações de tempo e temperatura no transporte (4,70%), o uso de matérias-primas sem registros (5,10%) e a exposição inadequada (6,20%) dos produtos finais representaram as não conformidades menos referidas nos laudos. Conclusões: As principais não conformidades verificadas nas inspeções da produção de alimentos pelos pequenos empreendimentos rurais de Minas Gerais demonstraram uma polarização no atendimento às exigências sanitárias, com a priorização de adequações à estruturação física, em detrimento aos processos educativos e de saneamento básico. Tais limitações no cumprimento das determinações normativas ressaltaram as fragilidades basilares que dificultam a inclusão produtiva, devendo servir de referência para as iniciativas de desenvolvimento do setor.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2020-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1476Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 8 No. 4 (2020): November - Monitoramento & Avaliação em Vigilância Sanitária; 116-123Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 8 Núm. 4 (2020): Noviembre - Monitoramento & Avaliação em Vigilância Sanitária; 116-123Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 8 n. 4 (2020): Novembro - Monitoramento & Avaliação em Vigilância Sanitária; 116-1232317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1476/1266https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1476/1301Copyright (c) 2020 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes César, Daniela Magela Moreira, Simone 2023-06-27T15:13:00Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1476Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:13Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Main non-conformities verified in health inspections in family farming and rural production in Minas Gerais Principais não conformidades verificadas nas inspeções sanitárias na agricultura familiar e na produção rural de Minas Gerais |
title |
Main non-conformities verified in health inspections in family farming and rural production in Minas Gerais |
spellingShingle |
Main non-conformities verified in health inspections in family farming and rural production in Minas Gerais Fernandes César, Daniela Public Health; Sanitary Inspection; Food Production; Public Policy Saúde Pública; Inspeção Sanitária; Produção de Alimentos; Política Pública Salud Publica Inspección Sanitaria Producción de Alimentos Política Pública Agroindustria |
title_short |
Main non-conformities verified in health inspections in family farming and rural production in Minas Gerais |
title_full |
Main non-conformities verified in health inspections in family farming and rural production in Minas Gerais |
title_fullStr |
Main non-conformities verified in health inspections in family farming and rural production in Minas Gerais |
title_full_unstemmed |
Main non-conformities verified in health inspections in family farming and rural production in Minas Gerais |
title_sort |
Main non-conformities verified in health inspections in family farming and rural production in Minas Gerais |
author |
Fernandes César, Daniela |
author_facet |
Fernandes César, Daniela Magela Moreira, Simone |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Magela Moreira, Simone |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes César, Daniela Magela Moreira, Simone |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Public Health; Sanitary Inspection; Food Production; Public Policy Saúde Pública; Inspeção Sanitária; Produção de Alimentos; Política Pública Salud Publica Inspección Sanitaria Producción de Alimentos Política Pública Agroindustria |
topic |
Public Health; Sanitary Inspection; Food Production; Public Policy Saúde Pública; Inspeção Sanitária; Produção de Alimentos; Política Pública Salud Publica Inspección Sanitaria Producción de Alimentos Política Pública Agroindustria |
description |
Introduction: The need to strengthen the initiatives of the productive model of family farming and rural producers in harmony with the procedures for the formalization and production of safe food requires that Health Surveillance departments better assess the risk related to these activities. Objective: To analyze the panorama of inadequacies to good manufacturing practices detected in the health inspections of rural producers or family farmers in the State of Minas Gerais. Method: Cross-sectional study based on the information obtained in the spreadsheet of risk notifications and risk situations (Planilha de notificações de riscos e situações de riscos) from the Health Department of Minas Gerais (Brazil). This spreadsheet collect data from all health inspections in food producing establishments of rural producers and family farmers, was carried out from January of 2017 to December of 2019, at 853 municipalities in the State. Results: 3,442 health inspection risk notifications were analyzed, showing that the highest percentages of non-compliance with hygienic-sanitary requirements were the absence of formal training for handlers, in 26.00% of inspections; the use of non-potable water detected in 16.50% and non-compliance with good practices by handlers, mentioned in 14.20%. On the contrary, the inadequacies of time and temperature in transportation (4.70%), the use of feedstock without registration (5.10%), and the inadequate exposure (6.20%) of the final products represented the non-conformities less referred to in the reports. Conclusions: The main non-conformities observed in inspections of small rural enterprises in Minas Gerais indicate that structural issues are a higher priority regarding health requirements to the detriment of educational and basic sanitation processes. These constraints on compliance with regulations expose the main vulnerabilities that hinder productive inclusion. These findings may serve as a reference for the sector’s development initiatives. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1476 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1476 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1476/1266 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1476/1301 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 8 No. 4 (2020): November - Monitoramento & Avaliação em Vigilância Sanitária; 116-123 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 8 Núm. 4 (2020): Noviembre - Monitoramento & Avaliação em Vigilância Sanitária; 116-123 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 8 n. 4 (2020): Novembro - Monitoramento & Avaliação em Vigilância Sanitária; 116-123 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042045878009856 |