Infusion pump risk management

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Etelvino, Mary Ane Lessa
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Pereira, Monaliza Gomes, Filho, Renato Dias Barreiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365
Resumo: Introduction: The increasing incidence of problems related to medical care equipment – infusion pumps. Objective: To make a situational diagnosis regarding the preventive maintenance of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps. Method: Descriptive, quantitative research, conducted in a federal hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro from April to June 2017. Results: 371 peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps of two different brands.Regarding the record of the last preventive maintenance identified, less than 10.0% of the equipment studied had maintenance on the day, 54.5% (n = 202) had a record of expired preventive maintenance, 5.9% (n = 22) had an unreadable record of preventive maintenance and 29.9% (n = 111) had no record of preventive maintenance. Conclusions: This situational diagnosis revealed an outdated technology park, with a significant lag in relation to the validity of preventive maintenance of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps. The improvement actions began with the updating of the patrimony data referring to the quantity of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps of the hospital. Subsequently, equipment with expired, ineligible and absent preventive maintenance was gradually collected for replacement. Finally, a monitoring of the conditions of the peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps was initiated so that there is a continuous control of the conditions of this equipment.
id FIOCRUZ-9_80d6efda053fff7b9dde5f324d6f096a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1365
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Infusion pump risk managementGerenciamento de risco em bombas de infusãoBombas de infusãoAvaliação de Tecnologia BiomédicaSegurança do PacienteInfusion PumpBiomedical Technology AssessmentPatient SafetyIntroduction: The increasing incidence of problems related to medical care equipment – infusion pumps. Objective: To make a situational diagnosis regarding the preventive maintenance of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps. Method: Descriptive, quantitative research, conducted in a federal hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro from April to June 2017. Results: 371 peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps of two different brands.Regarding the record of the last preventive maintenance identified, less than 10.0% of the equipment studied had maintenance on the day, 54.5% (n = 202) had a record of expired preventive maintenance, 5.9% (n = 22) had an unreadable record of preventive maintenance and 29.9% (n = 111) had no record of preventive maintenance. Conclusions: This situational diagnosis revealed an outdated technology park, with a significant lag in relation to the validity of preventive maintenance of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps. The improvement actions began with the updating of the patrimony data referring to the quantity of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps of the hospital. Subsequently, equipment with expired, ineligible and absent preventive maintenance was gradually collected for replacement. Finally, a monitoring of the conditions of the peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps was initiated so that there is a continuous control of the conditions of this equipment.Introdução: As bombas de infusão vêm sendo relacionadas ao aumento da incidência de problemas relacionados aos equipamentos médico-assistenciais. Objetivo: Realizar um diagnóstico situacional referente à manutenção preventiva das bombas de infusão volumétricas peristálticas. Método: Pesquisa descritiva, quantitativa, realizada em um hospital federal da cidade do Rio de Janeiro nos meses de abril a junho de 2017. Resultados: Foram analisadas 371 bombas de infusão volumétricas peristálticas, de duas marcas distintas. Em relação ao registro da última manutenção preventiva, identificouse que menos de 10,0% dos equipamentos estudados estavam com a manutenção em dia, 54,5% (n = 202) apresentavam registro de manutenção preventiva vencido, 5,9% (n = 22) possuíam registro de manutenção preventiva ilegível e 29,9% (n = 111), ausência de registro de manutenção preventiva. Conclusões: O diagnóstico situacional encontrado através da pesquisa foi um parque tecnológico desatualizado, com uma defasagem importante em relação à validade da manutenção preventiva das bombas de infusão volumétricas peristálticas. As ações de melhoria iniciaram-se com a atualização dos dados do patrimônio referente ao quantitativo de bombas de infusão volumétricas peristálticas da instituição hospitalar. Posteriormente, os equipamentos com manutenção preventiva vencida, inelegível e ausente foram recolhidos, gradualmente, para substituição. Por fim, foi iniciado um monitoramento das condições das bombas de infusão volumétricas peristálticas para que haja um controle contínuo das condições destes equipamentos.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2019-11-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/136510.22239/2317-269X.01365Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 4 (2019): November - Rede Sentinela; 61-66Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 4 (2019): Noviembre - Rede Sentinela; 61-66Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 4 (2019): Novembro - Rede Sentinela; 61-662317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365/1099https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365/1176Copyright (c) 2019 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEtelvino, Mary Ane LessaPereira, Monaliza GomesFilho, Renato Dias Barreiro2023-06-27T15:11:58Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1365Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:11:58Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Infusion pump risk management
Gerenciamento de risco em bombas de infusão
title Infusion pump risk management
spellingShingle Infusion pump risk management
Etelvino, Mary Ane Lessa
Bombas de infusão
Avaliação de Tecnologia Biomédica
Segurança do Paciente
Infusion Pump
Biomedical Technology Assessment
Patient Safety
title_short Infusion pump risk management
title_full Infusion pump risk management
title_fullStr Infusion pump risk management
title_full_unstemmed Infusion pump risk management
title_sort Infusion pump risk management
author Etelvino, Mary Ane Lessa
author_facet Etelvino, Mary Ane Lessa
Pereira, Monaliza Gomes
Filho, Renato Dias Barreiro
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Monaliza Gomes
Filho, Renato Dias Barreiro
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Etelvino, Mary Ane Lessa
Pereira, Monaliza Gomes
Filho, Renato Dias Barreiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bombas de infusão
Avaliação de Tecnologia Biomédica
Segurança do Paciente
Infusion Pump
Biomedical Technology Assessment
Patient Safety
topic Bombas de infusão
Avaliação de Tecnologia Biomédica
Segurança do Paciente
Infusion Pump
Biomedical Technology Assessment
Patient Safety
description Introduction: The increasing incidence of problems related to medical care equipment – infusion pumps. Objective: To make a situational diagnosis regarding the preventive maintenance of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps. Method: Descriptive, quantitative research, conducted in a federal hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro from April to June 2017. Results: 371 peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps of two different brands.Regarding the record of the last preventive maintenance identified, less than 10.0% of the equipment studied had maintenance on the day, 54.5% (n = 202) had a record of expired preventive maintenance, 5.9% (n = 22) had an unreadable record of preventive maintenance and 29.9% (n = 111) had no record of preventive maintenance. Conclusions: This situational diagnosis revealed an outdated technology park, with a significant lag in relation to the validity of preventive maintenance of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps. The improvement actions began with the updating of the patrimony data referring to the quantity of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps of the hospital. Subsequently, equipment with expired, ineligible and absent preventive maintenance was gradually collected for replacement. Finally, a monitoring of the conditions of the peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps was initiated so that there is a continuous control of the conditions of this equipment.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365
10.22239/2317-269X.01365
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.01365
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365/1099
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365/1176
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 4 (2019): November - Rede Sentinela; 61-66
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 4 (2019): Noviembre - Rede Sentinela; 61-66
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 4 (2019): Novembro - Rede Sentinela; 61-66
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042045444947968