Infusion pump risk management
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The increasing incidence of problems related to medical care equipment – infusion pumps. Objective: To make a situational diagnosis regarding the preventive maintenance of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps. Method: Descriptive, quantitative research, conducted in a federal hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro from April to June 2017. Results: 371 peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps of two different brands.Regarding the record of the last preventive maintenance identified, less than 10.0% of the equipment studied had maintenance on the day, 54.5% (n = 202) had a record of expired preventive maintenance, 5.9% (n = 22) had an unreadable record of preventive maintenance and 29.9% (n = 111) had no record of preventive maintenance. Conclusions: This situational diagnosis revealed an outdated technology park, with a significant lag in relation to the validity of preventive maintenance of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps. The improvement actions began with the updating of the patrimony data referring to the quantity of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps of the hospital. Subsequently, equipment with expired, ineligible and absent preventive maintenance was gradually collected for replacement. Finally, a monitoring of the conditions of the peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps was initiated so that there is a continuous control of the conditions of this equipment. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_80d6efda053fff7b9dde5f324d6f096a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1365 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Infusion pump risk managementGerenciamento de risco em bombas de infusãoBombas de infusãoAvaliação de Tecnologia BiomédicaSegurança do PacienteInfusion PumpBiomedical Technology AssessmentPatient SafetyIntroduction: The increasing incidence of problems related to medical care equipment – infusion pumps. Objective: To make a situational diagnosis regarding the preventive maintenance of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps. Method: Descriptive, quantitative research, conducted in a federal hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro from April to June 2017. Results: 371 peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps of two different brands.Regarding the record of the last preventive maintenance identified, less than 10.0% of the equipment studied had maintenance on the day, 54.5% (n = 202) had a record of expired preventive maintenance, 5.9% (n = 22) had an unreadable record of preventive maintenance and 29.9% (n = 111) had no record of preventive maintenance. Conclusions: This situational diagnosis revealed an outdated technology park, with a significant lag in relation to the validity of preventive maintenance of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps. The improvement actions began with the updating of the patrimony data referring to the quantity of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps of the hospital. Subsequently, equipment with expired, ineligible and absent preventive maintenance was gradually collected for replacement. Finally, a monitoring of the conditions of the peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps was initiated so that there is a continuous control of the conditions of this equipment.Introdução: As bombas de infusão vêm sendo relacionadas ao aumento da incidência de problemas relacionados aos equipamentos médico-assistenciais. Objetivo: Realizar um diagnóstico situacional referente à manutenção preventiva das bombas de infusão volumétricas peristálticas. Método: Pesquisa descritiva, quantitativa, realizada em um hospital federal da cidade do Rio de Janeiro nos meses de abril a junho de 2017. Resultados: Foram analisadas 371 bombas de infusão volumétricas peristálticas, de duas marcas distintas. Em relação ao registro da última manutenção preventiva, identificouse que menos de 10,0% dos equipamentos estudados estavam com a manutenção em dia, 54,5% (n = 202) apresentavam registro de manutenção preventiva vencido, 5,9% (n = 22) possuíam registro de manutenção preventiva ilegível e 29,9% (n = 111), ausência de registro de manutenção preventiva. Conclusões: O diagnóstico situacional encontrado através da pesquisa foi um parque tecnológico desatualizado, com uma defasagem importante em relação à validade da manutenção preventiva das bombas de infusão volumétricas peristálticas. As ações de melhoria iniciaram-se com a atualização dos dados do patrimônio referente ao quantitativo de bombas de infusão volumétricas peristálticas da instituição hospitalar. Posteriormente, os equipamentos com manutenção preventiva vencida, inelegível e ausente foram recolhidos, gradualmente, para substituição. Por fim, foi iniciado um monitoramento das condições das bombas de infusão volumétricas peristálticas para que haja um controle contínuo das condições destes equipamentos.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2019-11-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/136510.22239/2317-269X.01365Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 4 (2019): November - Rede Sentinela; 61-66Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 4 (2019): Noviembre - Rede Sentinela; 61-66Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 4 (2019): Novembro - Rede Sentinela; 61-662317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365/1099https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365/1176Copyright (c) 2019 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEtelvino, Mary Ane LessaPereira, Monaliza GomesFilho, Renato Dias Barreiro2023-06-27T15:11:58Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1365Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:11:58Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Infusion pump risk management Gerenciamento de risco em bombas de infusão |
title |
Infusion pump risk management |
spellingShingle |
Infusion pump risk management Etelvino, Mary Ane Lessa Bombas de infusão Avaliação de Tecnologia Biomédica Segurança do Paciente Infusion Pump Biomedical Technology Assessment Patient Safety |
title_short |
Infusion pump risk management |
title_full |
Infusion pump risk management |
title_fullStr |
Infusion pump risk management |
title_full_unstemmed |
Infusion pump risk management |
title_sort |
Infusion pump risk management |
author |
Etelvino, Mary Ane Lessa |
author_facet |
Etelvino, Mary Ane Lessa Pereira, Monaliza Gomes Filho, Renato Dias Barreiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, Monaliza Gomes Filho, Renato Dias Barreiro |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Etelvino, Mary Ane Lessa Pereira, Monaliza Gomes Filho, Renato Dias Barreiro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bombas de infusão Avaliação de Tecnologia Biomédica Segurança do Paciente Infusion Pump Biomedical Technology Assessment Patient Safety |
topic |
Bombas de infusão Avaliação de Tecnologia Biomédica Segurança do Paciente Infusion Pump Biomedical Technology Assessment Patient Safety |
description |
Introduction: The increasing incidence of problems related to medical care equipment – infusion pumps. Objective: To make a situational diagnosis regarding the preventive maintenance of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps. Method: Descriptive, quantitative research, conducted in a federal hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro from April to June 2017. Results: 371 peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps of two different brands.Regarding the record of the last preventive maintenance identified, less than 10.0% of the equipment studied had maintenance on the day, 54.5% (n = 202) had a record of expired preventive maintenance, 5.9% (n = 22) had an unreadable record of preventive maintenance and 29.9% (n = 111) had no record of preventive maintenance. Conclusions: This situational diagnosis revealed an outdated technology park, with a significant lag in relation to the validity of preventive maintenance of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps. The improvement actions began with the updating of the patrimony data referring to the quantity of peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps of the hospital. Subsequently, equipment with expired, ineligible and absent preventive maintenance was gradually collected for replacement. Finally, a monitoring of the conditions of the peristaltic volumetric infusion pumps was initiated so that there is a continuous control of the conditions of this equipment. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365 10.22239/2317-269X.01365 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01365 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365/1099 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1365/1176 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 4 (2019): November - Rede Sentinela; 61-66 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 4 (2019): Noviembre - Rede Sentinela; 61-66 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 4 (2019): Novembro - Rede Sentinela; 61-66 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042045444947968 |