Flexibilization of Brazilian Good Manufacturing Practices requirements during COVID-19 outbreak in a comparative perspective

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cassano, Adriano Olian
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Areda, Camila Alves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1710
Resumo: Introduction: The risk of drug shortages due to the COVID-19 pandemic required from national health authorities to take quick actions in order to avoid it and, at the same time, preserve the maintenance of a minimum standard of quality, safety and efficacy of medicines, as National Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) did by publishing RDC nº 392/2020. Objective: To carry out a comparative analysis between the exceptionalities listed in article 7 of RDC nº 392/2020 with the requirements of good manufacturing practices (GMP) exceptionally relaxed by foreign health authorities due to COVID-19, showing, whenever necessary, the impact of these requirements on the quality of medicines made available to the population. Method: A selective search was made for documents related to the temporary flexibility of GMP requirements for medicines and pharmaceutical ingredients during the COVID-19 pandemic at the electronic addresses on the internet of some health authorities. Such requirements were critically compared with those listed in article 7 of RDC nº 392/2020. Results: Exceptionalities were presented in a Table, detailing the topics and subtopics found in the analyzed documents of MHRA, EMA and Anvisa. More similarities were verified than differences between the flexible requirements, perhaps because RDC nº 392/2020 was prepared considering the documents referenced here from MHRA and EMA. Conclusions: Despite the mistakes pointed out and the criticisms made to RDC nº 392/2020, the merit of Anvisa cannot be diminished, as it was shown that regardless of the territory in which the regulatory agencies are located, there is considerable convergence among Brazilian expectations and those of the other health authorities consulted.
id FIOCRUZ-9_83aca088ea506b398ead6eed58b0b52b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1710
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Flexibilization of Brazilian Good Manufacturing Practices requirements during COVID-19 outbreak in a comparative perspectiveA flexibilização de requisitos brasileiros de Boas Práticas de Fabricação durante a pandemia da COVID-19 sob uma perspectiva comparadaCOVID-19AnvisaGood Manufacturing PracticesMedicinesFlexibilizationCOVID-19AnvisaBoas Práticas de FabricaçãoMedicamentosFlexibilizaçãoIntroduction: The risk of drug shortages due to the COVID-19 pandemic required from national health authorities to take quick actions in order to avoid it and, at the same time, preserve the maintenance of a minimum standard of quality, safety and efficacy of medicines, as National Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) did by publishing RDC nº 392/2020. Objective: To carry out a comparative analysis between the exceptionalities listed in article 7 of RDC nº 392/2020 with the requirements of good manufacturing practices (GMP) exceptionally relaxed by foreign health authorities due to COVID-19, showing, whenever necessary, the impact of these requirements on the quality of medicines made available to the population. Method: A selective search was made for documents related to the temporary flexibility of GMP requirements for medicines and pharmaceutical ingredients during the COVID-19 pandemic at the electronic addresses on the internet of some health authorities. Such requirements were critically compared with those listed in article 7 of RDC nº 392/2020. Results: Exceptionalities were presented in a Table, detailing the topics and subtopics found in the analyzed documents of MHRA, EMA and Anvisa. More similarities were verified than differences between the flexible requirements, perhaps because RDC nº 392/2020 was prepared considering the documents referenced here from MHRA and EMA. Conclusions: Despite the mistakes pointed out and the criticisms made to RDC nº 392/2020, the merit of Anvisa cannot be diminished, as it was shown that regardless of the territory in which the regulatory agencies are located, there is considerable convergence among Brazilian expectations and those of the other health authorities consulted.Introdução: O risco de desabastecimento de medicamentos em razão da pandemia da COVID-19 exigiu das autoridades sanitárias de alguns países medidas rápidas para tentar evitá-lo e, ao mesmo tempo, preservar a manutenção de um padrão mínimo de qualidade, segurança e eficácia dos medicamentos, como fez a Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa), ao publicar a Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada (RDC) nº 392, de 26 de maio de 2020. Objetivo: Realizar análise comparativa entre as excepcionalidades elencadas no artigo 7º da RDC nº 392/2020 com os requisitos de boas práticas de fabricação (BPF) excepcionalmente flexibilizados por autoridades sanitárias estrangeiras em razão da COVID-19, evidenciando, sempre que necessário, o impacto desses requisitos para a qualidade dos medicamentos disponibilizados à população. Método: Foi feita a busca seletiva por documentos relacionados à flexibilização transitória de requisitos de BPF de medicamentos e de insumos farmacêuticos durante a pandemia da COVID-19 nos endereços eletrônicos existentes na internet de algumas autoridades sanitárias. Tais requisitos foram criticamente comparados com aqueles elencados no artigo 7º da RDC nº 392/2020. Resultados: As excepcionalidades foram discriminadas em tópicos e subtópicos encontrados nos documentos analisados da MHRA, EMA e Anvisa. Foram verificadas mais semelhanças do que diferenças entre os requisitos flexibilizados, talvez porque a RDC nº 392/2020 tenha sido elaborada considerando os documentos aqui referenciados da MHRA e EMA. Conclusões: Em que pese os equívocos apontados e as críticas realizadas à RDC nº 392/2020, o mérito da atuação da Anvisa em nada pode ser diminuído, pois foi evidenciado que, independentemente do território em que estejam localizadas as agências reguladoras, há considerável convergência das expectativas brasileiras com as das demais autoridades sanitárias consultadas.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2020-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1710Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020): August; 44-51Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2020): Agosto; 44-51Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 8 n. 3 (2020): Agosto; 44-512317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1710/1206https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1710/1277Copyright (c) 2020 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCassano, Adriano OlianAreda, Camila Alves2023-06-27T15:12:36Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1710Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:12:36Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Flexibilization of Brazilian Good Manufacturing Practices requirements during COVID-19 outbreak in a comparative perspective
A flexibilização de requisitos brasileiros de Boas Práticas de Fabricação durante a pandemia da COVID-19 sob uma perspectiva comparada
title Flexibilization of Brazilian Good Manufacturing Practices requirements during COVID-19 outbreak in a comparative perspective
spellingShingle Flexibilization of Brazilian Good Manufacturing Practices requirements during COVID-19 outbreak in a comparative perspective
Cassano, Adriano Olian
COVID-19
Anvisa
Good Manufacturing Practices
Medicines
Flexibilization
COVID-19
Anvisa
Boas Práticas de Fabricação
Medicamentos
Flexibilização
title_short Flexibilization of Brazilian Good Manufacturing Practices requirements during COVID-19 outbreak in a comparative perspective
title_full Flexibilization of Brazilian Good Manufacturing Practices requirements during COVID-19 outbreak in a comparative perspective
title_fullStr Flexibilization of Brazilian Good Manufacturing Practices requirements during COVID-19 outbreak in a comparative perspective
title_full_unstemmed Flexibilization of Brazilian Good Manufacturing Practices requirements during COVID-19 outbreak in a comparative perspective
title_sort Flexibilization of Brazilian Good Manufacturing Practices requirements during COVID-19 outbreak in a comparative perspective
author Cassano, Adriano Olian
author_facet Cassano, Adriano Olian
Areda, Camila Alves
author_role author
author2 Areda, Camila Alves
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cassano, Adriano Olian
Areda, Camila Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID-19
Anvisa
Good Manufacturing Practices
Medicines
Flexibilization
COVID-19
Anvisa
Boas Práticas de Fabricação
Medicamentos
Flexibilização
topic COVID-19
Anvisa
Good Manufacturing Practices
Medicines
Flexibilization
COVID-19
Anvisa
Boas Práticas de Fabricação
Medicamentos
Flexibilização
description Introduction: The risk of drug shortages due to the COVID-19 pandemic required from national health authorities to take quick actions in order to avoid it and, at the same time, preserve the maintenance of a minimum standard of quality, safety and efficacy of medicines, as National Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) did by publishing RDC nº 392/2020. Objective: To carry out a comparative analysis between the exceptionalities listed in article 7 of RDC nº 392/2020 with the requirements of good manufacturing practices (GMP) exceptionally relaxed by foreign health authorities due to COVID-19, showing, whenever necessary, the impact of these requirements on the quality of medicines made available to the population. Method: A selective search was made for documents related to the temporary flexibility of GMP requirements for medicines and pharmaceutical ingredients during the COVID-19 pandemic at the electronic addresses on the internet of some health authorities. Such requirements were critically compared with those listed in article 7 of RDC nº 392/2020. Results: Exceptionalities were presented in a Table, detailing the topics and subtopics found in the analyzed documents of MHRA, EMA and Anvisa. More similarities were verified than differences between the flexible requirements, perhaps because RDC nº 392/2020 was prepared considering the documents referenced here from MHRA and EMA. Conclusions: Despite the mistakes pointed out and the criticisms made to RDC nº 392/2020, the merit of Anvisa cannot be diminished, as it was shown that regardless of the territory in which the regulatory agencies are located, there is considerable convergence among Brazilian expectations and those of the other health authorities consulted.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1710
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1710
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1710/1206
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1710/1277
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020): August; 44-51
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2020): Agosto; 44-51
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 8 n. 3 (2020): Agosto; 44-51
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042046048927744