Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903 |
Resumo: | Newborn screening comprises a set of tests that aim to detect pathologies in newborns and should be performed preferably between the 3rd and 7th month of life. The scree-ning detects six congenital anomalies: phenylketonuria, congenital hypothyroidism, sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, biotinidase deficiency, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia. According to the Ministry of Health, in 2007 the state of Amapá had the lowest population coverage for the screening tests in Brazil. Through a qualitative methodology, institu-tional data were collected in the reference laboratory of the State at the Institute of Hematology and Hemotherapy of Amapá (Hemoap), and a questionnaire was applied to the mothers or guardians of neonates at the moment of the test. Only 5 of the 16 muni-cipalities investigated carried out the newborn screening, providing a coverage of 31.2%. Regarding the questionnaires, the majority of the individuals did not have knowledge about the importance of the screening test; in contrast, 100.0% of the interviewed people said they had an interest in getting the results. Nevertheless, the study raised neglected data from 2013 to 2015, showing that there is a great disinterest by mothers or guardians and that the National Newborn Screening Program in Amapá is far from having a complete coverage and that databases are scarce regarding the information about this state. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_b87c40e1836b7262979b7526a6f1c143 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/903 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Newborn screening: current situation in the state of AmapáTriagem neonatal: o panorama atual no estado do AmapáTriagem NeonatalTeste do PezinhoBanco de DadosNeonatal ScreeningNewborn ScreeningDatabasesNewborn screening comprises a set of tests that aim to detect pathologies in newborns and should be performed preferably between the 3rd and 7th month of life. The scree-ning detects six congenital anomalies: phenylketonuria, congenital hypothyroidism, sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, biotinidase deficiency, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia. According to the Ministry of Health, in 2007 the state of Amapá had the lowest population coverage for the screening tests in Brazil. Through a qualitative methodology, institu-tional data were collected in the reference laboratory of the State at the Institute of Hematology and Hemotherapy of Amapá (Hemoap), and a questionnaire was applied to the mothers or guardians of neonates at the moment of the test. Only 5 of the 16 muni-cipalities investigated carried out the newborn screening, providing a coverage of 31.2%. Regarding the questionnaires, the majority of the individuals did not have knowledge about the importance of the screening test; in contrast, 100.0% of the interviewed people said they had an interest in getting the results. Nevertheless, the study raised neglected data from 2013 to 2015, showing that there is a great disinterest by mothers or guardians and that the National Newborn Screening Program in Amapá is far from having a complete coverage and that databases are scarce regarding the information about this state.A triagem neonatal conhecida como teste do pezinho é um conjunto de exames que tem como finalidade detectar patologias em recém-nascidos e que deve ser realizado preferencialmente entre o 3º e o 7º mês de vida do neonato. O teste detecta seis anomalias congênitas: fenilcetonúria, hipotireoidismo congênito, anemia falciforme, fibrose cística, deficiência de biotinidase e hiperplasia adrenal congênita. Para o Ministério da Saúde, em 2007, a menor cobertura populacional de teste do pezinho no Brasil ocorreu no Amapá. Através de uma metodologia qualitativa, foram coletados dados institucionais no laboratório de referência do estado, Instituto de Hematologia e Hemoterapia do Amapá (Hemoap), usando também como instrumento de pesquisa um questionário dirigido às mães e/ou responsáveis dos neonatos no momento de realização do exame. Dos resultados obtidos somente cinco municípios dos 16 realizam a coleta do teste do pezinho, dando uma cobertura de 31,2%. Quanto aos questionários, mostrou-se majoritário o número de indivíduos que não têm conhecimentos sobre a importância do exame. Em contrapartida, 100,0% dos entrevistados responderam que tinham interesse em retornar para buscar o resultado do exame, contudo o estudo levantou dados negligenciados dos anos de 2013 a 2015, demonstrando ser grande o desinteresse das mães e/ou responsáveis que levam o neonato para realizar o teste. Tais dados mostram que o Programa Nacional de Triagem Neonatal no Amapá está longe de obter uma cobertura completa e que os bancos de dados são escassos quanto a informações sobre o estado.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2017-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/90310.22239/2317-269X.00903Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): May; 89-96Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2017): Puede; 89-96Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 5 n. 2 (2017): Maio; 89-962317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903/384https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903/521Copyright (c) 2017 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes Lacerda, Grace SuzanCosta, Flávia SilvaDantas, Deyse de SouzaGuimarães Costa, Érika RodriguesResque, Rafael Limado Nascimento, Alessandra AzevedoGiacomet, Clóvis LucianoGomes, Madson Ralide Fonseca2023-06-27T15:19:44Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/903Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:19:44Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá Triagem neonatal: o panorama atual no estado do Amapá |
title |
Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá |
spellingShingle |
Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá Lopes Lacerda, Grace Suzan Triagem Neonatal Teste do Pezinho Banco de Dados Neonatal Screening Newborn Screening Databases |
title_short |
Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá |
title_full |
Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá |
title_fullStr |
Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá |
title_full_unstemmed |
Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá |
title_sort |
Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá |
author |
Lopes Lacerda, Grace Suzan |
author_facet |
Lopes Lacerda, Grace Suzan Costa, Flávia Silva Dantas, Deyse de Souza Guimarães Costa, Érika Rodrigues Resque, Rafael Lima do Nascimento, Alessandra Azevedo Giacomet, Clóvis Luciano Gomes, Madson Ralide Fonseca |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa, Flávia Silva Dantas, Deyse de Souza Guimarães Costa, Érika Rodrigues Resque, Rafael Lima do Nascimento, Alessandra Azevedo Giacomet, Clóvis Luciano Gomes, Madson Ralide Fonseca |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes Lacerda, Grace Suzan Costa, Flávia Silva Dantas, Deyse de Souza Guimarães Costa, Érika Rodrigues Resque, Rafael Lima do Nascimento, Alessandra Azevedo Giacomet, Clóvis Luciano Gomes, Madson Ralide Fonseca |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Triagem Neonatal Teste do Pezinho Banco de Dados Neonatal Screening Newborn Screening Databases |
topic |
Triagem Neonatal Teste do Pezinho Banco de Dados Neonatal Screening Newborn Screening Databases |
description |
Newborn screening comprises a set of tests that aim to detect pathologies in newborns and should be performed preferably between the 3rd and 7th month of life. The scree-ning detects six congenital anomalies: phenylketonuria, congenital hypothyroidism, sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, biotinidase deficiency, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia. According to the Ministry of Health, in 2007 the state of Amapá had the lowest population coverage for the screening tests in Brazil. Through a qualitative methodology, institu-tional data were collected in the reference laboratory of the State at the Institute of Hematology and Hemotherapy of Amapá (Hemoap), and a questionnaire was applied to the mothers or guardians of neonates at the moment of the test. Only 5 of the 16 muni-cipalities investigated carried out the newborn screening, providing a coverage of 31.2%. Regarding the questionnaires, the majority of the individuals did not have knowledge about the importance of the screening test; in contrast, 100.0% of the interviewed people said they had an interest in getting the results. Nevertheless, the study raised neglected data from 2013 to 2015, showing that there is a great disinterest by mothers or guardians and that the National Newborn Screening Program in Amapá is far from having a complete coverage and that databases are scarce regarding the information about this state. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-05-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903 10.22239/2317-269X.00903 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.00903 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903/384 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903/521 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): May; 89-96 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2017): Puede; 89-96 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 5 n. 2 (2017): Maio; 89-96 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042044777005056 |