Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes Lacerda, Grace Suzan
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Costa, Flávia Silva, Dantas, Deyse de Souza, Guimarães Costa, Érika Rodrigues, Resque, Rafael Lima, do Nascimento, Alessandra Azevedo, Giacomet, Clóvis Luciano, Gomes, Madson Ralide Fonseca
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903
Resumo: Newborn screening comprises a set of tests that aim to detect pathologies in newborns and should be performed preferably between the 3rd and 7th month of life. The scree-ning detects six congenital anomalies: phenylketonuria, congenital hypothyroidism, sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, biotinidase deficiency, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia. According to the Ministry of Health, in 2007 the state of Amapá had the lowest population coverage for the screening tests in Brazil. Through a qualitative methodology, institu-tional data were collected in the reference laboratory of the State at the Institute of Hematology and Hemotherapy of Amapá (Hemoap), and a questionnaire was applied to the mothers or guardians of neonates at the moment of the test. Only 5 of the 16 muni-cipalities investigated carried out the newborn screening, providing a coverage of 31.2%. Regarding the questionnaires, the majority of the individuals did not have knowledge about the importance of the screening test; in contrast, 100.0% of the interviewed people said they had an interest in getting the results. Nevertheless, the study raised neglected data from 2013 to 2015, showing that there is a great disinterest by mothers or guardians and that the National Newborn Screening Program in Amapá is far from having a complete coverage and that databases are scarce regarding the information about this state.
id FIOCRUZ-9_b87c40e1836b7262979b7526a6f1c143
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/903
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Newborn screening: current situation in the state of AmapáTriagem neonatal: o panorama atual no estado do AmapáTriagem NeonatalTeste do PezinhoBanco de DadosNeonatal ScreeningNewborn ScreeningDatabasesNewborn screening comprises a set of tests that aim to detect pathologies in newborns and should be performed preferably between the 3rd and 7th month of life. The scree-ning detects six congenital anomalies: phenylketonuria, congenital hypothyroidism, sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, biotinidase deficiency, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia. According to the Ministry of Health, in 2007 the state of Amapá had the lowest population coverage for the screening tests in Brazil. Through a qualitative methodology, institu-tional data were collected in the reference laboratory of the State at the Institute of Hematology and Hemotherapy of Amapá (Hemoap), and a questionnaire was applied to the mothers or guardians of neonates at the moment of the test. Only 5 of the 16 muni-cipalities investigated carried out the newborn screening, providing a coverage of 31.2%. Regarding the questionnaires, the majority of the individuals did not have knowledge about the importance of the screening test; in contrast, 100.0% of the interviewed people said they had an interest in getting the results. Nevertheless, the study raised neglected data from 2013 to 2015, showing that there is a great disinterest by mothers or guardians and that the National Newborn Screening Program in Amapá is far from having a complete coverage and that databases are scarce regarding the information about this state.A triagem neonatal conhecida como teste do pezinho é um conjunto de exames que tem como finalidade detectar patologias em recém-nascidos e que deve ser realizado preferencialmente entre o 3º e o 7º mês de vida do neonato. O teste detecta seis anomalias congênitas: fenilcetonúria, hipotireoidismo congênito, anemia falciforme, fibrose cística, deficiência de biotinidase e hiperplasia adrenal congênita. Para o Ministério da Saúde, em 2007, a menor cobertura populacional de teste do pezinho no Brasil ocorreu no Amapá. Através de uma metodologia qualitativa, foram coletados dados institucionais no laboratório de referência do estado, Instituto de Hematologia e Hemoterapia do Amapá (Hemoap), usando também como instrumento de pesquisa um questionário dirigido às mães e/ou responsáveis dos neonatos no momento de realização do exame. Dos resultados obtidos somente cinco municípios dos 16 realizam a coleta do teste do pezinho, dando uma cobertura de 31,2%. Quanto aos questionários, mostrou-se majoritário o número de indivíduos que não têm conhecimentos sobre a importância do exame. Em contrapartida, 100,0% dos entrevistados responderam que tinham interesse em retornar para buscar o resultado do exame, contudo o estudo levantou dados negligenciados dos anos de 2013 a 2015, demonstrando ser grande o desinteresse das mães e/ou responsáveis que levam o neonato para realizar o teste. Tais dados mostram que o Programa Nacional de Triagem Neonatal no Amapá está longe de obter uma cobertura completa e que os bancos de dados são escassos quanto a informações sobre o estado.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2017-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/90310.22239/2317-269X.00903Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): May; 89-96Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2017): Puede; 89-96Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 5 n. 2 (2017): Maio; 89-962317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903/384https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903/521Copyright (c) 2017 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes Lacerda, Grace SuzanCosta, Flávia SilvaDantas, Deyse de SouzaGuimarães Costa, Érika RodriguesResque, Rafael Limado Nascimento, Alessandra AzevedoGiacomet, Clóvis LucianoGomes, Madson Ralide Fonseca2023-06-27T15:19:44Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/903Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:19:44Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá
Triagem neonatal: o panorama atual no estado do Amapá
title Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá
spellingShingle Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá
Lopes Lacerda, Grace Suzan
Triagem Neonatal
Teste do Pezinho
Banco de Dados
Neonatal Screening
Newborn Screening
Databases
title_short Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá
title_full Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá
title_fullStr Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá
title_full_unstemmed Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá
title_sort Newborn screening: current situation in the state of Amapá
author Lopes Lacerda, Grace Suzan
author_facet Lopes Lacerda, Grace Suzan
Costa, Flávia Silva
Dantas, Deyse de Souza
Guimarães Costa, Érika Rodrigues
Resque, Rafael Lima
do Nascimento, Alessandra Azevedo
Giacomet, Clóvis Luciano
Gomes, Madson Ralide Fonseca
author_role author
author2 Costa, Flávia Silva
Dantas, Deyse de Souza
Guimarães Costa, Érika Rodrigues
Resque, Rafael Lima
do Nascimento, Alessandra Azevedo
Giacomet, Clóvis Luciano
Gomes, Madson Ralide Fonseca
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes Lacerda, Grace Suzan
Costa, Flávia Silva
Dantas, Deyse de Souza
Guimarães Costa, Érika Rodrigues
Resque, Rafael Lima
do Nascimento, Alessandra Azevedo
Giacomet, Clóvis Luciano
Gomes, Madson Ralide Fonseca
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Triagem Neonatal
Teste do Pezinho
Banco de Dados
Neonatal Screening
Newborn Screening
Databases
topic Triagem Neonatal
Teste do Pezinho
Banco de Dados
Neonatal Screening
Newborn Screening
Databases
description Newborn screening comprises a set of tests that aim to detect pathologies in newborns and should be performed preferably between the 3rd and 7th month of life. The scree-ning detects six congenital anomalies: phenylketonuria, congenital hypothyroidism, sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, biotinidase deficiency, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia. According to the Ministry of Health, in 2007 the state of Amapá had the lowest population coverage for the screening tests in Brazil. Through a qualitative methodology, institu-tional data were collected in the reference laboratory of the State at the Institute of Hematology and Hemotherapy of Amapá (Hemoap), and a questionnaire was applied to the mothers or guardians of neonates at the moment of the test. Only 5 of the 16 muni-cipalities investigated carried out the newborn screening, providing a coverage of 31.2%. Regarding the questionnaires, the majority of the individuals did not have knowledge about the importance of the screening test; in contrast, 100.0% of the interviewed people said they had an interest in getting the results. Nevertheless, the study raised neglected data from 2013 to 2015, showing that there is a great disinterest by mothers or guardians and that the National Newborn Screening Program in Amapá is far from having a complete coverage and that databases are scarce regarding the information about this state.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903
10.22239/2317-269X.00903
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.00903
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903/384
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/903/521
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): May; 89-96
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2017): Puede; 89-96
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 5 n. 2 (2017): Maio; 89-96
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042044777005056