Quality of the package inserts of phytomedicines in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/677 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to assess whether the package inserts of industrialized phytomedicines are in line with current Brazilian legislation or not. Forty-one package inserts of phytomedicines containing artichoke, horse chestnut, ginkgo and senna were accessed in the respective proprietary websites and then analyzed. The analysis aimed to verify the presence of items required by the normative RDC 47/2009 and the usage indication, dosage and side effects compared to standard package inserts and to the scientific literature. Quantitative analysis proved that the package inserts are in accordance with the current legislation. However, in qualitative analysis, all phytomedicines analyzed in this study had at least one error related to dosage, posology or adverse reactions. A gradual improvement of the package inserts of phytomedicines has been noticed but, even with the availability of standard package inserts, some mistakes persist, which can induce the patient to incorrect use. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_e3a84d2a245fee663f7b4b8dbb2aed63 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/677 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Quality of the package inserts of phytomedicines in BrazilQualidade das bulas de fitoterápicos no BrasilBulas de MedicamentosFitoterápicosLegislação SanitáriaVigilância SanitáriaMedicine Package InsertsPhytomedicinesHealth LegislationHealth SurveillanceThe objective of this study was to assess whether the package inserts of industrialized phytomedicines are in line with current Brazilian legislation or not. Forty-one package inserts of phytomedicines containing artichoke, horse chestnut, ginkgo and senna were accessed in the respective proprietary websites and then analyzed. The analysis aimed to verify the presence of items required by the normative RDC 47/2009 and the usage indication, dosage and side effects compared to standard package inserts and to the scientific literature. Quantitative analysis proved that the package inserts are in accordance with the current legislation. However, in qualitative analysis, all phytomedicines analyzed in this study had at least one error related to dosage, posology or adverse reactions. A gradual improvement of the package inserts of phytomedicines has been noticed but, even with the availability of standard package inserts, some mistakes persist, which can induce the patient to incorrect use.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar se as bulas de medicamentos fitoterápicos industrializados estão de acordo com a legislação nacional vigente. Foram analisadas 41 bulas dos medicamentos fitoterápicos compostos por alcachofra, castanha da Índia, ginkgo e sene, adquiridas nos sites das empresas titulares dos registros. A análise foi feita quanto à presença de itens segundo a RDC nº 47 de 2009 e ao conteúdo de indicação de uso, posologia e reações adversas comparada às bulas padrão e à literatura científica. A análise quantitativa provou que as bulas têm cumprido o que é exigido pela legislação vigente. No entanto, quanto à análise qualitativa, todos os fitoterápicos analisados neste trabalho possuíam pelo menos uma bula com erro relacionado à posologia, indicações de uso e reações adversas. Houve uma melhora gradativa das bulas dos medicamentos fitoterápicos, porém mesmo com as bulas padrão ainda existem erros, que podem induzir o paciente ao uso incorreto do medicamento.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2016-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/67710.3395/2317-269x.00677Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016): May; 56-64Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 2 (2016): Puede; 56-64Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 2 (2016): Maio; 56-642317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/677/302Copyright (c) 2016 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva, Jéssica DomingosPassos, Márcia Maria Barros dosSimas, Naomi Katodos Santos, Maria Isabel Sampaio2023-06-27T15:16:52Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/677Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:16:52Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality of the package inserts of phytomedicines in Brazil Qualidade das bulas de fitoterápicos no Brasil |
title |
Quality of the package inserts of phytomedicines in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Quality of the package inserts of phytomedicines in Brazil da Silva, Jéssica Domingos Bulas de Medicamentos Fitoterápicos Legislação Sanitária Vigilância Sanitária Medicine Package Inserts Phytomedicines Health Legislation Health Surveillance |
title_short |
Quality of the package inserts of phytomedicines in Brazil |
title_full |
Quality of the package inserts of phytomedicines in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Quality of the package inserts of phytomedicines in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality of the package inserts of phytomedicines in Brazil |
title_sort |
Quality of the package inserts of phytomedicines in Brazil |
author |
da Silva, Jéssica Domingos |
author_facet |
da Silva, Jéssica Domingos Passos, Márcia Maria Barros dos Simas, Naomi Kato dos Santos, Maria Isabel Sampaio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Passos, Márcia Maria Barros dos Simas, Naomi Kato dos Santos, Maria Isabel Sampaio |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Silva, Jéssica Domingos Passos, Márcia Maria Barros dos Simas, Naomi Kato dos Santos, Maria Isabel Sampaio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bulas de Medicamentos Fitoterápicos Legislação Sanitária Vigilância Sanitária Medicine Package Inserts Phytomedicines Health Legislation Health Surveillance |
topic |
Bulas de Medicamentos Fitoterápicos Legislação Sanitária Vigilância Sanitária Medicine Package Inserts Phytomedicines Health Legislation Health Surveillance |
description |
The objective of this study was to assess whether the package inserts of industrialized phytomedicines are in line with current Brazilian legislation or not. Forty-one package inserts of phytomedicines containing artichoke, horse chestnut, ginkgo and senna were accessed in the respective proprietary websites and then analyzed. The analysis aimed to verify the presence of items required by the normative RDC 47/2009 and the usage indication, dosage and side effects compared to standard package inserts and to the scientific literature. Quantitative analysis proved that the package inserts are in accordance with the current legislation. However, in qualitative analysis, all phytomedicines analyzed in this study had at least one error related to dosage, posology or adverse reactions. A gradual improvement of the package inserts of phytomedicines has been noticed but, even with the availability of standard package inserts, some mistakes persist, which can induce the patient to incorrect use. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/677 10.3395/2317-269x.00677 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/677 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3395/2317-269x.00677 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/677/302 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016): May; 56-64 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 2 (2016): Puede; 56-64 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 2 (2016): Maio; 56-64 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042044643835904 |