Agrochemicals for pest control in Brazil: critical analysis of the use of the term agrotóxico as a tool for risk communication

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rembischevski, Peter
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Caldas, Eloisa Dutra
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1195
Resumo: Due to their potential to impact human health and the environment, agrochemicals used for pest control are among the most controversial and regulated substances worldwide. In Brazil, the controversy starts with the name given to these products, including the one stated in the Law n. 7802/89 – agrotóxicos, only adopted in the country. This paper covers the historical context that led to the inclusion of this term in the Law, and shows data indicating that this action did not affect the safety practices adopted by the farmers and the number of intoxications, nor affected the commercialization of these products, which were the primary goals of the governmental authorities. Furthermore, the paper discusses other terms used in the world, considering the key factors that could affect the risks and the use of these products. The authors concluded that the term agrotóxico does not contain the necessary technical or semantic attributes to be adopted in a legal text, and that neologisms to send positive or negative messages are not appropriate for communicating the risks posed by these products to the general population and farmers, in a honest, responsible and technically supported way.
id FIOCRUZ-9_f9178695fb4083be2eb85e955082383d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1195
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Agrochemicals for pest control in Brazil: critical analysis of the use of the term agrotóxico as a tool for risk communicationAgroquímicos para controle de pragas no Brasil: análise crítica do uso do termo agrotóxico como ferramenta de comunicação de riscoAgrochemicalsLegislationCommunicationRiskAgroquímicosLegislaçãoComunicaçãoRiscoDue to their potential to impact human health and the environment, agrochemicals used for pest control are among the most controversial and regulated substances worldwide. In Brazil, the controversy starts with the name given to these products, including the one stated in the Law n. 7802/89 – agrotóxicos, only adopted in the country. This paper covers the historical context that led to the inclusion of this term in the Law, and shows data indicating that this action did not affect the safety practices adopted by the farmers and the number of intoxications, nor affected the commercialization of these products, which were the primary goals of the governmental authorities. Furthermore, the paper discusses other terms used in the world, considering the key factors that could affect the risks and the use of these products. The authors concluded that the term agrotóxico does not contain the necessary technical or semantic attributes to be adopted in a legal text, and that neologisms to send positive or negative messages are not appropriate for communicating the risks posed by these products to the general population and farmers, in a honest, responsible and technically supported way.Devido ao seu potencial de causar danos à saúde e ao meio ambiente, os agroquímicos utilizados para o controle de pragas estão entre as substâncias mais controversas e reguladas no mundo. No Brasil, a polêmica começa pelo nome que se dá a esses produtos, incluindo a denominação agrotóxicos prevista na Lei nº 7.802, de 11 de julho de 1989, de estrutura semântica pouco ortodoxa e só adotada no país. O presente texto aborda o contexto histórico nacional que levou à incorporação do termo na Lei e apresenta dados que indicam não ter havido sinais de que esta medida tenha exercido influência efetiva sobre as práticas de segurança adotadas pelos agricultores, as intoxicações e tampouco impactou na comercialização desses produtos, apesar de terem sido estes os objetivos iniciais das autoridades. Discute, ainda, as terminologias adotadas em outros países para denominá-los, à luz dos fatores que verdadeiramente impactam na redução dos riscos e do uso dessas substâncias. Os autores concluíram que o termo agrotóxico não possui os atributos técnicos nem semânticos necessários para uma adoção legal, e o uso de neologismos, seja com conotações negativas ou positivas, não é apropriado para comunicar o risco destas substâncias aos trabalhadores e à população geral, de forma honesta, responsável e tecnicamente embasada.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2018-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/119510.22239/2317-269X.01195Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2018): November; 2-12Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2018): Noviembre; 2-12Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 6 n. 4 (2018): Novembro; 2-122317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1195/551https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1195/1022Copyright (c) 2018 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRembischevski, PeterCaldas, Eloisa Dutra2023-06-27T15:20:10Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1195Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:20:10Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Agrochemicals for pest control in Brazil: critical analysis of the use of the term agrotóxico as a tool for risk communication
Agroquímicos para controle de pragas no Brasil: análise crítica do uso do termo agrotóxico como ferramenta de comunicação de risco
title Agrochemicals for pest control in Brazil: critical analysis of the use of the term agrotóxico as a tool for risk communication
spellingShingle Agrochemicals for pest control in Brazil: critical analysis of the use of the term agrotóxico as a tool for risk communication
Rembischevski, Peter
Agrochemicals
Legislation
Communication
Risk
Agroquímicos
Legislação
Comunicação
Risco
title_short Agrochemicals for pest control in Brazil: critical analysis of the use of the term agrotóxico as a tool for risk communication
title_full Agrochemicals for pest control in Brazil: critical analysis of the use of the term agrotóxico as a tool for risk communication
title_fullStr Agrochemicals for pest control in Brazil: critical analysis of the use of the term agrotóxico as a tool for risk communication
title_full_unstemmed Agrochemicals for pest control in Brazil: critical analysis of the use of the term agrotóxico as a tool for risk communication
title_sort Agrochemicals for pest control in Brazil: critical analysis of the use of the term agrotóxico as a tool for risk communication
author Rembischevski, Peter
author_facet Rembischevski, Peter
Caldas, Eloisa Dutra
author_role author
author2 Caldas, Eloisa Dutra
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rembischevski, Peter
Caldas, Eloisa Dutra
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agrochemicals
Legislation
Communication
Risk
Agroquímicos
Legislação
Comunicação
Risco
topic Agrochemicals
Legislation
Communication
Risk
Agroquímicos
Legislação
Comunicação
Risco
description Due to their potential to impact human health and the environment, agrochemicals used for pest control are among the most controversial and regulated substances worldwide. In Brazil, the controversy starts with the name given to these products, including the one stated in the Law n. 7802/89 – agrotóxicos, only adopted in the country. This paper covers the historical context that led to the inclusion of this term in the Law, and shows data indicating that this action did not affect the safety practices adopted by the farmers and the number of intoxications, nor affected the commercialization of these products, which were the primary goals of the governmental authorities. Furthermore, the paper discusses other terms used in the world, considering the key factors that could affect the risks and the use of these products. The authors concluded that the term agrotóxico does not contain the necessary technical or semantic attributes to be adopted in a legal text, and that neologisms to send positive or negative messages are not appropriate for communicating the risks posed by these products to the general population and farmers, in a honest, responsible and technically supported way.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1195
10.22239/2317-269X.01195
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1195
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.01195
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1195/551
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1195/1022
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2018): November; 2-12
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2018): Noviembre; 2-12
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 6 n. 4 (2018): Novembro; 2-12
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042045287661568