Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169 |
Resumo: | Introduction: In the State of São Paulo, the concentration of fluoride in the public water supply should be maintained in the range of 0.6 to 0.8 mg/L, in order to prevent caries and avoid the risk of fluorosis. Objective: To evaluate the concentration of fluoride in public water supply in the municipalities covered by the Bauru Sanitary Surveillance Group. Method: Data were extracted from the routine of the Adolfo Lutz Institute – Bauru, from 38 municipalities monitored by the Proágua Program, in the period 2007–2016. Laboratory analyses were performed using the potentiometric method with ion-selective electrode and the interpretation of the results was based on Resolution SS-250/95 and the classification proposed by the Collaborating Center of the Ministry of Health in Oral Health Surveillance (CECOL) Results: Of the 8,887 samples analyzed, 31.1% had inadequate levels of fluoride ions, with 22.7% being below and 8.4% above the limit established by the legislation. According to the CECOL proposal, 59.4% of the samples showed maximum benefit for caries prevention and 0.6% revealed a very high risk for the production of dental fluorosis. Conclusions: These data point out the need to improve the operational control of the fluoridation process and emphasize the importance of water quality surveillance. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_fdc9d67024b01755c9524065d1594dc8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1169 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, BrazilFluoretação das águas de abastecimento público: 10 anos de monitoramento em 38 municípios do Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, BrasilWaterFluorideFluoridationPublic SupplySanitary SurveillanceÁguaFlúorFluoretaçãoAbastecimento PúblicoVigilância SanitáriaIntroduction: In the State of São Paulo, the concentration of fluoride in the public water supply should be maintained in the range of 0.6 to 0.8 mg/L, in order to prevent caries and avoid the risk of fluorosis. Objective: To evaluate the concentration of fluoride in public water supply in the municipalities covered by the Bauru Sanitary Surveillance Group. Method: Data were extracted from the routine of the Adolfo Lutz Institute – Bauru, from 38 municipalities monitored by the Proágua Program, in the period 2007–2016. Laboratory analyses were performed using the potentiometric method with ion-selective electrode and the interpretation of the results was based on Resolution SS-250/95 and the classification proposed by the Collaborating Center of the Ministry of Health in Oral Health Surveillance (CECOL) Results: Of the 8,887 samples analyzed, 31.1% had inadequate levels of fluoride ions, with 22.7% being below and 8.4% above the limit established by the legislation. According to the CECOL proposal, 59.4% of the samples showed maximum benefit for caries prevention and 0.6% revealed a very high risk for the production of dental fluorosis. Conclusions: These data point out the need to improve the operational control of the fluoridation process and emphasize the importance of water quality surveillance.Introdução: No estado de São Paulo, a concentração de flúor na água de abastecimento público deve ser mantida na faixa de 0,6 a 0,8 mg/L, a fim de prevenir a cárie e evitar o risco de fluorose. Objetivo: Avaliar a concentração de fluoretos na água de abastecimento público dos municípios de abrangência do Grupo de Vigilância Sanitária de Bauru. Método: Os dados foram extraídos da rotina do Instituto Adolfo Lutz – Bauru e oriundos de 38 municípios monitorados pelo Programa de Vigilância da Qualidade da Água para Consumo Humano (Proágua), no período de 2007–2016. As análises laboratoriais foram realizadas utilizando-se o método potenciométrico com eletrodo íon-seletivo e a interpretação dos resultados baseou-se na Resolução SS nº 250/95 e na classificação proposta pelo Centro Colaborador do Ministério da Saúde em Vigilância da Saúde Bucal (CECOL). Resultados: Das 8.887 amostras analisadas, 31,1% apresentaram teores inadequados de íons fluoretos, sendo que 22,7% estavam abaixo e 8,4% acima do limite estabelecido pela legislação. De acordo com a proposta do CECOL, 59,4% das amostras exibiram benefício máximo para prevenção de cárie e 0,6% revelaram risco muito alto para produção de fluorose dentária. Conclusões: Tais dados apontam a necessidade de aprimorar o controle operacional do processo de fluoretação e enfatiza a importância da vigilância da qualidade da água.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2018-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/116910.22239/2317-269X.01169Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2018): November; 47-55Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2018): Noviembre; 47-55Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 6 n. 4 (2018): Novembro; 47-552317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169/546https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169/1058Copyright (c) 2018 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRomani, Caroline DemaiStancari, Regina Célia ArantesNascentes, Gabriel Antonio NogueiraAnversa, Laís2023-06-27T15:20:10Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1169Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:20:10Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil Fluoretação das águas de abastecimento público: 10 anos de monitoramento em 38 municípios do Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brasil |
title |
Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil Romani, Caroline Demai Water Fluoride Fluoridation Public Supply Sanitary Surveillance Água Flúor Fluoretação Abastecimento Público Vigilância Sanitária |
title_short |
Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil |
title_full |
Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil |
title_sort |
Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil |
author |
Romani, Caroline Demai |
author_facet |
Romani, Caroline Demai Stancari, Regina Célia Arantes Nascentes, Gabriel Antonio Nogueira Anversa, Laís |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Stancari, Regina Célia Arantes Nascentes, Gabriel Antonio Nogueira Anversa, Laís |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Romani, Caroline Demai Stancari, Regina Célia Arantes Nascentes, Gabriel Antonio Nogueira Anversa, Laís |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Water Fluoride Fluoridation Public Supply Sanitary Surveillance Água Flúor Fluoretação Abastecimento Público Vigilância Sanitária |
topic |
Water Fluoride Fluoridation Public Supply Sanitary Surveillance Água Flúor Fluoretação Abastecimento Público Vigilância Sanitária |
description |
Introduction: In the State of São Paulo, the concentration of fluoride in the public water supply should be maintained in the range of 0.6 to 0.8 mg/L, in order to prevent caries and avoid the risk of fluorosis. Objective: To evaluate the concentration of fluoride in public water supply in the municipalities covered by the Bauru Sanitary Surveillance Group. Method: Data were extracted from the routine of the Adolfo Lutz Institute – Bauru, from 38 municipalities monitored by the Proágua Program, in the period 2007–2016. Laboratory analyses were performed using the potentiometric method with ion-selective electrode and the interpretation of the results was based on Resolution SS-250/95 and the classification proposed by the Collaborating Center of the Ministry of Health in Oral Health Surveillance (CECOL) Results: Of the 8,887 samples analyzed, 31.1% had inadequate levels of fluoride ions, with 22.7% being below and 8.4% above the limit established by the legislation. According to the CECOL proposal, 59.4% of the samples showed maximum benefit for caries prevention and 0.6% revealed a very high risk for the production of dental fluorosis. Conclusions: These data point out the need to improve the operational control of the fluoridation process and emphasize the importance of water quality surveillance. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169 10.22239/2317-269X.01169 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01169 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169/546 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169/1058 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2018): November; 47-55 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2018): Noviembre; 47-55 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 6 n. 4 (2018): Novembro; 47-55 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1797042045265641472 |