Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Romani, Caroline Demai
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Stancari, Regina Célia Arantes, Nascentes, Gabriel Antonio Nogueira, Anversa, Laís
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169
Resumo: Introduction: In the State of São Paulo, the concentration of fluoride in the public water supply should be maintained in the range of 0.6 to 0.8 mg/L, in order to prevent caries and avoid the risk of fluorosis. Objective: To evaluate the concentration of fluoride in public water supply in the municipalities covered by the Bauru Sanitary Surveillance Group. Method: Data were extracted from the routine of the Adolfo Lutz Institute – Bauru, from 38 municipalities monitored by the Proágua Program, in the period 2007–2016. Laboratory analyses were performed using the potentiometric method with ion-selective electrode and the interpretation of the results was based on Resolution SS-250/95 and the classification proposed by the Collaborating Center of the Ministry of Health in Oral Health Surveillance (CECOL) Results: Of the 8,887 samples analyzed, 31.1% had inadequate levels of fluoride ions, with 22.7% being below and 8.4% above the limit established by the legislation. According to the CECOL proposal, 59.4% of the samples showed maximum benefit for caries prevention and 0.6% revealed a very high risk for the production of dental fluorosis. Conclusions: These data point out the need to improve the operational control of the fluoridation process and emphasize the importance of water quality surveillance.
id FIOCRUZ-9_fdc9d67024b01755c9524065d1594dc8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1169
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, BrazilFluoretação das águas de abastecimento público: 10 anos de monitoramento em 38 municípios do Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, BrasilWaterFluorideFluoridationPublic SupplySanitary SurveillanceÁguaFlúorFluoretaçãoAbastecimento PúblicoVigilância SanitáriaIntroduction: In the State of São Paulo, the concentration of fluoride in the public water supply should be maintained in the range of 0.6 to 0.8 mg/L, in order to prevent caries and avoid the risk of fluorosis. Objective: To evaluate the concentration of fluoride in public water supply in the municipalities covered by the Bauru Sanitary Surveillance Group. Method: Data were extracted from the routine of the Adolfo Lutz Institute – Bauru, from 38 municipalities monitored by the Proágua Program, in the period 2007–2016. Laboratory analyses were performed using the potentiometric method with ion-selective electrode and the interpretation of the results was based on Resolution SS-250/95 and the classification proposed by the Collaborating Center of the Ministry of Health in Oral Health Surveillance (CECOL) Results: Of the 8,887 samples analyzed, 31.1% had inadequate levels of fluoride ions, with 22.7% being below and 8.4% above the limit established by the legislation. According to the CECOL proposal, 59.4% of the samples showed maximum benefit for caries prevention and 0.6% revealed a very high risk for the production of dental fluorosis. Conclusions: These data point out the need to improve the operational control of the fluoridation process and emphasize the importance of water quality surveillance.Introdução: No estado de São Paulo, a concentração de flúor na água de abastecimento público deve ser mantida na faixa de 0,6 a 0,8 mg/L, a fim de prevenir a cárie e evitar o risco de fluorose. Objetivo: Avaliar a concentração de fluoretos na água de abastecimento público dos municípios de abrangência do Grupo de Vigilância Sanitária de Bauru. Método: Os dados foram extraídos da rotina do Instituto Adolfo Lutz – Bauru e oriundos de 38 municípios monitorados pelo Programa de Vigilância da Qualidade da Água para Consumo Humano (Proágua), no período de 2007–2016. As análises laboratoriais foram realizadas utilizando-se o método potenciométrico com eletrodo íon-seletivo e a interpretação dos resultados baseou-se na Resolução SS nº 250/95 e na classificação proposta pelo Centro Colaborador do Ministério da Saúde em Vigilância da Saúde Bucal (CECOL). Resultados: Das 8.887 amostras analisadas, 31,1% apresentaram teores inadequados de íons fluoretos, sendo que 22,7% estavam abaixo e 8,4% acima do limite estabelecido pela legislação. De acordo com a proposta do CECOL, 59,4% das amostras exibiram benefício máximo para prevenção de cárie e 0,6% revelaram risco muito alto para produção de fluorose dentária. Conclusões: Tais dados apontam a necessidade de aprimorar o controle operacional do processo de fluoretação e enfatiza a importância da vigilância da qualidade da água.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2018-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/116910.22239/2317-269X.01169Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2018): November; 47-55Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2018): Noviembre; 47-55Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 6 n. 4 (2018): Novembro; 47-552317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169/546https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169/1058Copyright (c) 2018 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRomani, Caroline DemaiStancari, Regina Célia ArantesNascentes, Gabriel Antonio NogueiraAnversa, Laís2023-06-27T15:20:10Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1169Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:20:10Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
Fluoretação das águas de abastecimento público: 10 anos de monitoramento em 38 municípios do Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brasil
title Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
spellingShingle Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
Romani, Caroline Demai
Water
Fluoride
Fluoridation
Public Supply
Sanitary Surveillance
Água
Flúor
Fluoretação
Abastecimento Público
Vigilância Sanitária
title_short Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
title_full Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
title_fullStr Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
title_sort Public water supply fluoridation: 10 years of monitoring in 38 municipalities of Centro-Oeste Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
author Romani, Caroline Demai
author_facet Romani, Caroline Demai
Stancari, Regina Célia Arantes
Nascentes, Gabriel Antonio Nogueira
Anversa, Laís
author_role author
author2 Stancari, Regina Célia Arantes
Nascentes, Gabriel Antonio Nogueira
Anversa, Laís
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Romani, Caroline Demai
Stancari, Regina Célia Arantes
Nascentes, Gabriel Antonio Nogueira
Anversa, Laís
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Water
Fluoride
Fluoridation
Public Supply
Sanitary Surveillance
Água
Flúor
Fluoretação
Abastecimento Público
Vigilância Sanitária
topic Water
Fluoride
Fluoridation
Public Supply
Sanitary Surveillance
Água
Flúor
Fluoretação
Abastecimento Público
Vigilância Sanitária
description Introduction: In the State of São Paulo, the concentration of fluoride in the public water supply should be maintained in the range of 0.6 to 0.8 mg/L, in order to prevent caries and avoid the risk of fluorosis. Objective: To evaluate the concentration of fluoride in public water supply in the municipalities covered by the Bauru Sanitary Surveillance Group. Method: Data were extracted from the routine of the Adolfo Lutz Institute – Bauru, from 38 municipalities monitored by the Proágua Program, in the period 2007–2016. Laboratory analyses were performed using the potentiometric method with ion-selective electrode and the interpretation of the results was based on Resolution SS-250/95 and the classification proposed by the Collaborating Center of the Ministry of Health in Oral Health Surveillance (CECOL) Results: Of the 8,887 samples analyzed, 31.1% had inadequate levels of fluoride ions, with 22.7% being below and 8.4% above the limit established by the legislation. According to the CECOL proposal, 59.4% of the samples showed maximum benefit for caries prevention and 0.6% revealed a very high risk for the production of dental fluorosis. Conclusions: These data point out the need to improve the operational control of the fluoridation process and emphasize the importance of water quality surveillance.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169
10.22239/2317-269X.01169
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.01169
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169/546
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1169/1058
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2018): November; 47-55
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2018): Noviembre; 47-55
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 6 n. 4 (2018): Novembro; 47-55
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042045265641472